Yamamoto Takateru, Tsukube Takuro, Wada Yuko, Hoshino Masato, Yagi Naoto, Nakagawa Kazunori, Nakashima Yutaka, Okada Kenji, Seto Tatsuichiro
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan.
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kobe Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
JVS Vasc Sci. 2023 Jul 24;4:100123. doi: 10.1016/j.jvssci.2023.100123. eCollection 2023.
Synchrotron radiation-based X ray phase-contrast tomography (XPCT) was used in this study to evaluate abdominal aorta specimens from patients with sac expansion without evidence of an endoleak (endotension) following endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The aim of this study was to analyze the morphologic structure of the aortic wall in patients with this condition and to establish the cause of the endotension.
Human aortic specimens of the abdominal aorta were obtained during open repair, fixed with formalin, and analyzed among three groups. Group A was specimens from open abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs (n = 7). Group E was specimens from sac expansion without an evident endoleak after EVAR (n = 7). Group N was specimens from non-aneurysmal "normal" cadaveric abdominal aortas (n = 5). Using XPCT (effective voxel size, 12.5 μm; density resolution, 1 mg/cm), we measured the density of the tunica media (TM) in six regions of each sample. Then, any changes to the elastic lamina and the vasa vasorum were analyzed pathologically. The specimens were immunohistochemically examined with anti-CD31 and vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies.
The time from EVAR to open aortic repair was 64.2 ± 7.2 months. There were significant differences in the thickness of the TM among three groups: 0.98 ± 0.03 mm in Group N; 0.31 ± 0.01 mm in Group A; and 0.15 ± 0.03 mm in Group E ( < .005). There were significant differences in the TM density among the groups: 1.087 ± 0.004 g/cm in Group N; 1.070 ± 0.001 g/cm in Group A; and 1.062 ± 0.007 g/cm in Group E ( < .005). Differences in the thickness and density of the TM correlated with the thickness of the elastic lamina; in Group N, uniform high-density elastic fibers were observed in the TM. By contrast, a thinning of the elastic lamina in the TM was observed in Group A. A marked thinness and loss of elastic fibers was observed in Group E. CD31 immunostaining revealed that the vasa vasorum was localized in the adventitia and inside the outer third of the TM in Group N, and in the middle of the TM in Group A. In Group E, the vasa vasorum advanced up to the intima with vascular endothelial growth factor-positive cells in the intimal section.
XPCT could be used to demonstrate the densitometric property of the aortic aneurysmal wall after EVAR. We confirmed that the deformation process that occurs in the sac expansion after EVAR without evidence of an endoleak could be explained by hypoxia in the aortic wall.
本研究采用基于同步辐射的X射线相衬断层扫描(XPCT)技术,对腹主动脉瘤(AAA)血管内修复术(EVAR)后出现瘤囊扩张且无内漏证据(内张力)患者的腹主动脉标本进行评估。本研究的目的是分析该情况下患者主动脉壁的形态结构,并确定内张力的原因。
在开放修复过程中获取人腹主动脉标本,用福尔马林固定,并在三组中进行分析。A组为开放腹主动脉瘤修复标本(n = 7)。E组为EVAR后瘤囊扩张且无明显内漏的标本(n = 7)。N组为非动脉瘤性“正常”尸体腹主动脉标本(n = 5)。使用XPCT(有效体素大小,12.5μm;密度分辨率,1mg/cm),我们测量了每个样本六个区域的中膜(TM)密度。然后,对弹性膜和滋养血管的任何变化进行病理分析。标本用抗CD31和血管内皮生长因子抗体进行免疫组织化学检查。
从EVAR到开放主动脉修复的时间为64.2±7.2个月。三组中TM厚度存在显著差异:N组为0.98±0.03mm;A组为0.31±0.01mm;E组为0.15±0.03mm(P<0.005)。各组间TM密度存在显著差异:N组为1.087±0.004g/cm;A组为1.070±0.001g/cm;E组为1.062±0.007g/cm(P<0.005)。TM厚度和密度的差异与弹性膜厚度相关;在N组中,TM中观察到均匀的高密度弹性纤维。相比之下,A组中TM的弹性膜变薄。E组中观察到弹性纤维明显变薄和缺失。CD31免疫染色显示,N组中滋养血管位于外膜和TM外三分之一内部,A组中位于TM中部。在E组中,滋养血管向上延伸至内膜,内膜部分有血管内皮生长因子阳性细胞。
XPCT可用于显示EVAR后主动脉瘤壁的密度特性。我们证实,EVAR后无内漏证据的瘤囊扩张过程中发生的变形可由主动脉壁缺氧来解释。