Stahmeyer Jona T, Schauer Svenja, Rossol Siegbert, Heinrich Wedemeyer Hans, Wirth Daniel, Bianic Florence, Krauth Christian
Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Krankenhaus Nordwest Medical Clinic, Frankfurt, Germany.
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2013 Dec 18;1(3):239-253. eCollection 2014.
About 400,000-500,000 people are infected with hepatitis C in Germany. Long-term consequences are the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The introduction of first generation protease inhibitors has significantly improved the treatment of hepatitis C genotype 1 patients. The aim of the study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of triple therapy with telaprevir in Germany. We used a Markov model on disease progression and natural history to assess the cost-effectiveness of triple therapy with telaprevir compared to standard treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Model structure and inputs were discussed with clinical experts. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to verify the robustness of results. The base-case analyses shows that triple therapy results in higher costs (untreated patients: €48,446 vs. €30,691; previously treated patients: €63,228 vs. €48,603) and better outcomes (untreated patients: 16.85 qualily of life years [QALYs] vs. 15.97 QALYs; previously treated patients: 14.16 QALYs vs. 12.89 QALYs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was €20,131 per QALY and €30,567 per life year gained (LYG) for previously untreated patients. ICER in treatment experienced patients was €7,664 per QALY for relapse patients, €12,506 per QALY for partial responders and €28,429 per QALY for null responders. Results were robust in sensitivity analyses. Although triple therapy with telaprevir leads to additional costs, there is a high probability of being cost-effective for different thresholds. This health economic analysis makes an important contribution to current debates on cost savings and efficient resource allocation in the German healthcare sector.
在德国,约有40万至50万人感染丙型肝炎。其长期后果是发展为肝硬化和肝细胞癌。第一代蛋白酶抑制剂的引入显著改善了丙型肝炎1型患者的治疗。本研究的目的是评估特拉匹韦三联疗法在德国的成本效益。我们使用了一个关于疾病进展和自然史的马尔可夫模型,以评估特拉匹韦三联疗法与聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林标准治疗相比的成本效益。模型结构和输入数据与临床专家进行了讨论。进行了确定性和概率性敏感性分析,以验证结果的稳健性。基础病例分析表明,三联疗法导致更高的成本(未治疗患者:48,446欧元对30,691欧元;既往治疗患者:63,228欧元对48,603欧元)和更好的结果(未治疗患者:16.85个生活质量年[QALY]对15.97个QALY;既往治疗患者:14.16个QALY对12.89个QALY)。对于既往未治疗的患者,增量成本效益比(ICER)为每QALY 20,131欧元,每获得一个生命年(LYG)为30,567欧元。在有治疗经验的患者中,复发患者的ICER为每QALY 7,664欧元,部分缓解患者为每QALY 12,506欧元,无反应患者为每QALY 28,429欧元。敏感性分析结果具有稳健性。虽然特拉匹韦三联疗法会导致额外成本,但在不同阈值下具有成本效益的可能性很高。这项卫生经济分析为德国医疗保健部门当前关于成本节约和有效资源分配的辩论做出了重要贡献。