Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 Mar;117(3):535-541. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.08.019. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
In 2016 we reported promising midterm outcomes of bicuspid pulmonary valve replacement using 0.1-mm polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane. This follow-up study analyzes long-term outcomes and risk factors for reintervention and structural valve deterioration (SVD).
We performed a retrospective review of the original 119 patients who underwent PTFE bicuspid pulmonary valve replacement. Median patient age was 16.9 years (range, 0.4-57.1). Reintervention was defined as any surgical or percutaneous catheter procedure on the PTFE valve. SVD was defined as development of a peak pressure gradient ≥ 50 mm Hg or at least a moderate amount of pulmonary regurgitation on follow-up echocardiography.
The median follow-up duration was 9.5 years. The survival rate was 96.5% at 5 and 10 years, with 2 early and 2 late mortalities. Freedom from reintervention was 90.0% at 5 years and 63.3% at 10 years. Freedom from SVD was 92.8% at 5 years and 51.1% at 10 years, with regurgitation the predominant mode (64.6%). Freedom from both reintervention and SVD at 5 and 10 years were 89.1% and 49.5%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified smaller valve diameter (hazard ratio, 0.82; P < .001) and more than trivial pulmonary regurgitation at discharge (hazard ratio, 5.81; P < .001) as risk factors for reintervention or SVD.
Long-term results of the PTFE bicuspid pulmonary valve replacement were acceptable. However, improvements may be needed to reduce technical error and improve durability. Smaller valve diameter and more than trivial pulmonary regurgitation at discharge were risk factors for reintervention or SVD, warranting careful follow-up for timely reintervention.
2016 年,我们报告了使用 0.1 毫米聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)膜行双瓣式肺动脉瓣置换术的中期结果。本随访研究分析了长期结果以及再次干预和结构性瓣膜退化(SVD)的风险因素。
我们对 119 例接受 PTFE 双瓣式肺动脉瓣置换术的患者进行了回顾性研究。患者的中位年龄为 16.9 岁(范围:0.4-57.1 岁)。再次干预定义为对 PTFE 瓣膜进行的任何外科或经皮导管介入治疗。SVD 定义为随访超声心动图显示出现峰值压力梯度≥50mmHg 或至少出现中度肺动脉瓣反流。
中位随访时间为 9.5 年。5 年和 10 年的生存率分别为 96.5%,有 2 例早期死亡和 2 例晚期死亡。5 年和 10 年的无再次干预率分别为 90.0%和 63.3%。5 年和 10 年的无 SVD 率分别为 92.8%和 51.1%,其中以反流为主(64.6%)。5 年和 10 年时无再次干预和 SVD 的生存率分别为 89.1%和 49.5%。多变量分析显示,瓣膜直径较小(风险比为 0.82;P<0.001)和出院时存在大量或中度以上的肺动脉瓣反流(风险比为 5.81;P<0.001)是再次干预或 SVD 的风险因素。
PTFE 双瓣式肺动脉瓣置换术的长期结果尚可。然而,可能需要改进技术以减少技术错误并提高耐久性。瓣膜直径较小和出院时存在大量或中度以上的肺动脉瓣反流是再次干预或 SVD 的风险因素,需要密切随访以便及时进行再次干预。