• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性的平均骨材料强度指数值低于男性:来自单一地理位置的数据。

Mean Bone Material Strength Index Values for Women are Lower Than Those for Men: Data from a Single Geographical Location.

机构信息

IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Autonomous University of Barcelona and CIBERFES, Instituto Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Calcif Tissue Int. 2023 Nov;113(5):511-514. doi: 10.1007/s00223-023-01133-9. Epub 2023 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00223-023-01133-9
PMID:37666992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10618326/
Abstract

Bone material strength index (BMSi) values are obtained using impact microindentation, which assesses the ability of bone to resist indentation. Differences in BMSi between men and women are unclear, and to date, BMSi sex differences have not been compared for individuals from the same population. Therefore, we compared BMSi values for men and women drawn from the same geographical location in Australia. Participants (n = 220) were from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. BMSi was measured, following international published guidelines, using an OsteoProbe for participants at recent follow-up phases (women 2022-2023 and men 2016-2022). Women (n = 55) were age matched to men (n = 165) in a 1:3 ratio. A two-sample t test was used to determine the intergroup difference in mean BMSi. Linear regression was also performed, adjusting for weight and height. Median (IQR) ages for men and women were 67.0 (61.7-71.5) and 67.4 (62.0-71.2) years (p = 0.998). Men were heavier (81.0 ± 10.9 vs 71.0 ± 13.9 kg, p < 0.001) and taller (173.9 ± 6.4 vs 161.5 ± 7.5 cm, p < 0.001) than women. Mean (± SD) BMSi for women (75.7 ± 7.4) was lower than for men (82.8 ± 6.8) (p < 0.001). The difference persisted after adjustment for weight and height (mean ± SE: 76.5 ± 1.1 vs 82.5 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). Given the higher fracture risk observed for women, the higher mean BMSi values in men are consistent with cross sectional data suggesting this measure may be useful in fracture prediction.

摘要

骨材料强度指数 (BMSi) 值是通过冲击微压痕获得的,该方法评估了骨骼抵抗压痕的能力。男性和女性之间的 BMSi 差异尚不清楚,迄今为止,尚未对来自同一人群的个体进行 BMSi 性别差异比较。因此,我们比较了来自澳大利亚同一地理位置的男性和女性的 BMSi 值。参与者(n=220)来自 Geelong 骨质疏松症研究。根据国际发表的指南,使用 OsteoProbe 测量了参与者在最近随访阶段(女性 2022-2023 年和男性 2016-2022 年)的 BMSi。按照 1:3 的比例,将女性(n=55)与男性(n=165)年龄匹配。使用两样本 t 检验确定组间平均 BMSi 的差异。还进行了线性回归,调整了体重和身高。男性和女性的中位(IQR)年龄分别为 67.0(61.7-71.5)和 67.4(62.0-71.2)岁(p=0.998)。男性比女性更重(81.0±10.9 比 71.0±13.9 kg,p<0.001)和更高(173.9±6.4 比 161.5±7.5 cm,p<0.001)。女性的平均(±SD)BMSi(75.7±7.4)低于男性(82.8±6.8)(p<0.001)。调整体重和身高后,差异仍然存在(平均±SE:76.5±1.1 比 82.5±0.6,p<0.001)。鉴于女性观察到的骨折风险更高,男性较高的平均 BMSi 值与横断面数据一致,表明该指标可能有助于骨折预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9630/10618326/b45e7c91713c/223_2023_1133_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9630/10618326/b45e7c91713c/223_2023_1133_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9630/10618326/b45e7c91713c/223_2023_1133_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Mean Bone Material Strength Index Values for Women are Lower Than Those for Men: Data from a Single Geographical Location.女性的平均骨材料强度指数值低于男性:来自单一地理位置的数据。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2023 Nov;113(5):511-514. doi: 10.1007/s00223-023-01133-9. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
2
For older individuals there is greater variance in low mean Bone Material Strength Index values obtained with the OsteoProbe.对于年龄较大的个体,使用骨探测器获得的低平均骨材料强度指数值存在更大的差异。
Bone Rep. 2023 Nov 14;19:101727. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2023.101727. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Normative Data for Impact Microindentation for Australian Men: Cross-Sectional Data From the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.澳大利亚男性冲击微压痕的标准数据:来自吉朗骨质疏松症研究的横断面数据。
JBMR Plus. 2020 Jul 18;4(9):e10384. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10384. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Reference Intervals for Bone Impact Microindentation in Healthy Adults: A Multi-Centre International Study.健康成年人骨冲击微压痕的参考区间:一项多中心国际研究。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2023 Mar;112(3):338-349. doi: 10.1007/s00223-022-01047-y. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
5
Associations Between Bone Impact Microindentation and Clinical Risk Factors for Fracture.骨冲击微压痕与骨折临床危险因素的相关性。
Endocrinology. 2019 Sep 1;160(9):2143-2150. doi: 10.1210/en.2019-00415.
6
Bone material strength index as measured by in vivo impact microindentation is normal in subjects with high-energy trauma fractures.体内冲击微钻测量的骨材料强度指数在高能创伤骨折患者中正常。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Jul;33(7):1511-1519. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06368-0. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
7
Treatments of osteoporosis increase bone material strength index in patients with low bone mass.骨质疏松症的治疗方法可以提高低骨量患者的骨材料强度指数。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Sep;31(9):1683-1690. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05375-3. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
8
Impact microindentation in men with impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes.空腹血糖受损和 2 型糖尿病男性的冲击微压痕。
Bone. 2021 Jan;142:115685. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115685. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
9
Bone material strength is associated with areal BMD but not with prevalent fractures in older women.骨材料强度与老年女性的骨面积密度相关,但与既往骨折无关。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Apr;27(4):1585-1592. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3419-0. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
10
Bone material strength index as measured by impact microindentation is low in patients with fractures irrespective of fracture site.骨材料强度指数由冲击微压痕测量,无论骨折部位如何,骨折患者的该指数均较低。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Aug;28(8):2433-2437. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4054-8. Epub 2017 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased Bone Material Strength Index Is Positively Associated With the Risk of Incident Osteoporotic Fractures in Older Swedish Women.骨材料强度指数增加与老年瑞典女性骨质疏松性骨折风险呈正相关。
J Bone Miner Res. 2023 Jun;38(6):860-868. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4816. Epub 2023 May 9.
2
Reference Intervals for Bone Impact Microindentation in Healthy Adults: A Multi-Centre International Study.健康成年人骨冲击微压痕的参考区间:一项多中心国际研究。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2023 Mar;112(3):338-349. doi: 10.1007/s00223-022-01047-y. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
3
Bone material strength index as measured by in vivo impact microindentation is normal in subjects with high-energy trauma fractures.
体内冲击微钻测量的骨材料强度指数在高能创伤骨折患者中正常。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Jul;33(7):1511-1519. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06368-0. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
4
Management of osteoporosis in older men.老年男性骨质疏松症的管理。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jun;33(6):1439-1452. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01845-8. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
5
Bone Material Strength Index as Measured by Impact Microindentation is Low in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism.通过冲击微压痕测量的骨材料强度指数在原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进患者中较低。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jun 16;106(7):e2527-e2534. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab207.
6
Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia.骨冲击微压痕测试的可行性和耐受性:澳大利亚一项基于人群的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e023959. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023959.
7
Bone material strength index as measured by impact microindentation is low in patients with fractures irrespective of fracture site.骨材料强度指数由冲击微压痕测量,无论骨折部位如何,骨折患者的该指数均较低。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Aug;28(8):2433-2437. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4054-8. Epub 2017 May 2.
8
Technical note: Recommendations for a standard procedure to assess cortical bone at the tissue-level in vivo using impact microindentation.技术说明:关于使用冲击微压痕在体内组织水平评估皮质骨的标准程序的建议。
Bone Rep. 2016 Dec;5:181-185. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
9
Brief Report: HIV Infection Is Associated With Worse Bone Material Properties, Independently of Bone Mineral Density.简要报告:HIV感染与较差的骨材料特性相关,与骨矿物质密度无关。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Jul 1;72(3):314-8. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000965.
10
Are the High Hip Fracture Rates Among Norwegian Women Explained by Impaired Bone Material Properties?挪威女性髋部骨折率高是由骨材料特性受损所致吗?
J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Oct;30(10):1784-9. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2537. Epub 2015 May 21.