• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

膜翅目工蜂为何会流向非亲代群体?广义互惠和最大化群体及亲代成功。

Why do Hymenopteran workers drift to non-natal groups? Generalized reciprocity and the maximization of group and parental success.

机构信息

Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

J Evol Biol. 2023 Oct;36(10):1365-1374. doi: 10.1111/jeb.14215. Epub 2023 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1111/jeb.14215
PMID:37667646
Abstract

Eusocial Hymenoptera are often characterized by having facultatively or obligately sterile worker castes. However, findings across an increasing number of species are that some workers are non-natal-they have 'drifted' away from where they were born and raised. Moreover, drifters are often indistinguishable from natal workers in the work and benefits provided to joined groups. This seems an evolutionary paradox of providing benefits to potentially unrelated individuals over close kin. Rather than being mistakes, drifting is proposed to be adaptive if joiners either gain inclusive fitness by preferentially moving to other kin groups or through generalized reciprocity in which exchanging workers across groups raises group-level genetic diversity and creates social heterosis. It is unclear, however, if reciprocity is unlikely because of a susceptibility to cheating. In resolving this question, a series of evolutionary simulations show: (1) Reciprocity can persist under a range of genetic assumptions and scenarios of cheating, (2) cheating almost always evolves, but can be expressed in a variety of ways that are not always predictable, (3) the inclusive fitness hypothesis is equally or more susceptible to cheating. Moreover, existing data in Hymenoptera (although not extensive) are more consistent with generalized reciprocity. This supports a hypothesis that drifting, as a phenomenon, may more often reflect maximization of group and parental fitness rather than fitness gains for the individual drifters.

摘要

社会性膜翅目昆虫通常具有可育或必需的不育工蜂等级。然而,越来越多的物种发现,一些工蜂是非原生的——它们已经“漂移”远离了出生和成长的地方。此外,漂移工蜂在为加入的群体提供的工作和福利方面通常与原生工蜂无法区分。这似乎是一种进化悖论,即为潜在的非亲缘个体提供利益,而不是近亲。如果加入者通过优先转移到其他亲缘群体或通过广义互惠(通过在群体之间交换工人来提高群体水平的遗传多样性并产生社会杂种优势)获得包容性适合度,那么漂移被认为是适应性的,而不是错误的。然而,如果由于容易受骗而不太可能互惠,那么情况就不清楚了。在解决这个问题时,一系列进化模拟表明:(1)在一系列遗传假设和欺骗场景下,互惠可以持续存在;(2)欺骗几乎总是会进化,但可以以各种不可预测的方式表达;(3)包容性适合度假说同样或更容易受到欺骗。此外,膜翅目(尽管不广泛)中的现有数据更符合广义互惠。这支持了一个假设,即漂移作为一种现象,可能更经常反映出最大化群体和父母的适应性,而不是个体漂移者的适应性收益。

相似文献

1
Why do Hymenopteran workers drift to non-natal groups? Generalized reciprocity and the maximization of group and parental success.膜翅目工蜂为何会流向非亲代群体?广义互惠和最大化群体及亲代成功。
J Evol Biol. 2023 Oct;36(10):1365-1374. doi: 10.1111/jeb.14215. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
2
Resolving the evolution of sterile worker castes: a window on the advantages and disadvantages of monogamy.解决不育工蜂等级的进化:对一夫一妻制的优缺点的一个窗口。
Biol Lett. 2014 Mar 19;10(3):20140089. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0089. Print 2014 Mar.
3
Sex investment ratios in eusocial Hymenoptera support inclusive fitness theory.群居性膜翅目昆虫的性别投资比例支持广义适合度理论。
J Evol Biol. 2015 Nov;28(11):2106-11. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12710. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
4
Social heterosis and the maintenance of genetic diversity.社会杂种优势与遗传多样性的维持
J Evol Biol. 2007 Nov;20(6):2253-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01418.x.
5
Radio-tagging technology reveals extreme nest-drifting behavior in a eusocial insect.无线电追踪技术揭示了一种群居昆虫的极端巢穴漂移行为。
Curr Biol. 2007 Jan 23;17(2):140-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.11.064.
6
Mosaicism may explain the evolution of social characters in haplodiploid Hymenoptera with female workers.嵌合体或许可以解释具有雌性工蜂的单倍二倍体膜翅目昆虫社会行为特征的演变。
Genetica. 2010 Dec;138(11-12):1111-7. doi: 10.1007/s10709-010-9515-3. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
7
Monogamy and high relatedness do not preferentially favor the evolution of cooperation.专偶制和高度近亲繁殖并不会优先促进合作的进化。
BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Mar 4;11:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-58.
8
Relatedness, conflict, and the evolution of eusociality.亲缘关系、冲突与真社会性的演化。
PLoS Biol. 2015 Mar 23;13(3):e1002098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002098. eCollection 2015 Mar.
9
Kinship, greenbeards, and runaway social selection in the evolution of social insect cooperation.亲缘关系、绿胡子和社会性昆虫合作进化中的私奔式社会选择
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 28;108 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):10808-15. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100297108. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
10
Cheating and punishment in cooperative animal societies.合作性动物群体中的欺骗与惩罚
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150090. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0090.

引用本文的文献

1
Ant foraging: optimizing self-organization as a solution to a traveling salesman problem.蚂蚁觅食:优化自组织以解决旅行商问题。
Oecologia. 2025 Apr 30;207(5):73. doi: 10.1007/s00442-025-05720-5.
2
Individual and social heterosis act independently in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies.个体杂种优势和社会杂种优势在蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)蜂群中独立起作用。
J Hered. 2025 Jan 3;116(1):54-61. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esae043.