• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英语加勒比地区腹腔镜胆总管探查术治疗胆总管结石的多中心研究

Multicenter Study of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis in the English-Speaking Caribbean.

作者信息

Cawich Shamir O, Griffith Sahle P, Greenidge Charles W, Bonadie Kimon, Mohammed Fawwaz, Padmore Greg M, Algu Tameshwar, Ramcharran Hemraj, Naraynsingh Vijay

机构信息

Surgery, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, TTO.

Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Bridgetown, BRB.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Aug 4;15(8):e42949. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42949. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.42949
PMID:37667693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10475270/
Abstract

Background Common bile duct (CBD) exploration to address choledocholithiasis is not widely practiced in the English-speaking Caribbean. This study sought to determine the frequency of laparoscopic CBD explorations in the English-speaking Caribbean and to document the stone clearance rates and short-term outcomes of this procedure. Methods We accessed records for all practicing laparoscopic surgeons in the English-speaking Caribbean who performed laparoscopic CBD explorations over a 10-year period from January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2023. The following data were extracted retrospectively from patient records: demographic details, operating time, stone clearance rates, retained stone rates, conversions, and complications. All data were analyzed with SPSS version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Over the 10-year study period, 35 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and synchronous CBD exploration in Barbados, Cayman Islands, Guyana, Grenada, St Lucia, and Trinidad & Tobago. The procedure was performed at low volumes of only 0.7 procedures per surgical team per annum. The conversion rate to open CBD exploration was 13% and when laparoscopic CBD exploration was completed, it resulted in 96.3% stone clearance, 3.7% retained stones, mean hospitalization of two days, 9.7% minor morbidity, and no mortality. Conclusion Laparoscopic CBD exploration is feasible in the resource-poor Caribbean setting, and it yields good results, with 96.3% stone clearance rates, 9.7% minor morbidity, and no mortality. These results are better than those reported in Caribbean literature for stone extraction with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP).

摘要

背景 在讲英语的加勒比地区,用于治疗胆总管结石的胆总管探查术并未广泛开展。本研究旨在确定讲英语的加勒比地区腹腔镜胆总管探查术的频率,并记录该手术的结石清除率和短期结果。方法 我们获取了2013年1月1日至2023年6月30日这10年间在讲英语的加勒比地区进行腹腔镜胆总管探查术的所有执业腹腔镜外科医生的记录。以下数据从患者记录中进行回顾性提取:人口统计学细节、手术时间、结石清除率、残留结石率、中转率和并发症。所有数据均使用SPSS 20版(IBM公司,纽约州阿蒙克)进行分析。结果 在这10年的研究期间,巴巴多斯、开曼群岛、圭亚那、格林纳达、圣卢西亚以及特立尼达和多巴哥共有35例患者接受了腹腔镜胆囊切除术并同期进行胆总管探查。该手术的实施量较低,每个手术团队每年仅进行0.7例手术。转为开腹胆总管探查的比例为13%,完成腹腔镜胆总管探查后,结石清除率为96.3%,残留结石率为3.7%,平均住院天数为2天;轻微并发症发生率为9.7%,无死亡病例。结论 在资源匮乏的加勒比地区开展腹腔镜胆总管探查术是可行的,且效果良好,结石清除率为96.3%;轻微并发症发生率为9.7%,无死亡病例。这些结果优于加勒比地区文献中报道的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)取石结果。

相似文献

1
Multicenter Study of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis in the English-Speaking Caribbean.英语加勒比地区腹腔镜胆总管探查术治疗胆总管结石的多中心研究
Cureus. 2023 Aug 4;15(8):e42949. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42949. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 12;2013(12):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub4.
3
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 3(9):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub3.
4
Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Clearance, is It Feasible and Safe After Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography?腹腔镜胆总管清理术,在内镜逆行胰胆管造影失败后是否可行且安全?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Jan;33(1):1-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0142. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
5
Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a case-control study comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for a "laparoscopy-first" attitude with the outcome for sequential treatment (systematic endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy).胆囊胆管结石病:一种病例对照研究,比较了“腹腔镜优先”态度与序贯治疗(系统内镜括约肌切开术继以腹腔镜胆囊切除术)的短期和长期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jan;24(1):51-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0511-6. Epub 2009 May 23.
6
Three modalities on management of choledocholithiasis: A prospective cohort study.三种方法治疗胆总管结石:前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2017 Aug;44:269-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.06.032. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
7
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub2.
8
Five-Year Experience with Transcystic Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration.经胆囊管腹腔镜胆总管探查 5 年经验总结
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Mar;33(3):276-280. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0408. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
9
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜胆总管探查术联合胆囊切除术与内镜逆行胰胆管造影术联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊胆管结石:一项荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3275-3286. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06613-w. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
10
Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis.一期腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术与二期内镜下取石后腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效比较:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析,并采用试验序贯分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Sep;32(9):3763-3776. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6170-8. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration.腹腔镜胆总管探查术
JAMA Surg. 2023 Jul 1;158(7):766-767. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.8141.
2
Time to abandon the old dictum of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after acute cholecystitis has settled in Caribbean practice.在加勒比地区的实践中,急性胆囊炎消退后,应摒弃腹腔镜胆囊切除术延迟的旧观念。
Trop Doct. 2021 Oct;51(4):539-541. doi: 10.1177/00494755211010002. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
3
Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Should Be Performed for Acute Cholecystitis in Trinidad and Tobago.
Popul Health Manag. 2021 Oct;24(5):633-634. doi: 10.1089/pop.2021.0102. Epub 2021 May 24.
4
Laparoscopic Completion Cholecystectomy: An Audit from the Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA) Caribbean Chapter.腹腔镜胆囊切除术:美洲肝胰胆协会(AHPBA)加勒比分会的一项审计
Cureus. 2020 Oct 24;12(10):e11126. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11126.
5
Outcomes of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus primary LCBDE for managing cholecystocholedocholithiasis.内镜逆行胰胆管造影失败后行腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)与初次行LCBDE治疗胆囊胆总管结石的疗效比较
J Int Med Res. 2020 Oct;48(10):300060520957560. doi: 10.1177/0300060520957560.
6
The Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Combined with Cholecystectomy for the Management of Cholecysto-choledocholithiasis: An Up-to-date Meta-analysis.腹腔镜胆总管探查术联合胆囊切除术治疗胆囊胆管结石症的安全性和疗效:最新荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2018 Aug;268(2):247-253. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002731.
7
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic bile duct exploration versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜胆管探查术与内镜括约肌切开术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(37):e7925. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007925.
8
Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: 9 Years Experience from a Single Center.腹腔镜胆总管探查术:来自单一中心的9年经验
Front Surg. 2016 Apr 25;3:23. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00023. eCollection 2016.
9
Complications of ERCP for choledocholithiasis in a sickle cell cohort.镰状细胞病患者队列中行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗胆总管结石的并发症
Trop Doct. 2015 Jan;45(1):15-20. doi: 10.1177/0049475514552550. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
10
T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.腹腔镜胆总管探查术后T管引流与一期缝合的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 21;2013(6):CD005641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005641.pub3.