Al-Ardah Mahmoud, Barnett Rebecca E, Whewell Harriet, Boyce Tamsin, Rasheed Ashraf
Gwent Center for Digestive Diseases, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, Wales, United Kingdom.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Jan;33(1):1-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0142. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
Concomitant gallstones and common bile duct (CBD) stones is a common problem, and there is still no consensus on the best approach in the management. Options include preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with CBD exploration, and LC with postoperative ERCP. Each option has its own limitations and complications. In this article, we assessed the feasibility of laparoscopic surgical clearance of the CBD after a failed ERCP, reasons for failure of endoscopic clearance in our cohort. We will discuss the management options after ERCP failure, the challenges, and the outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed all the cases of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) performed in our hospital between April 2006 and January 2019. Two hundred cases were performed, 178 cases as a primary procedure while 22 were performed as a secondary procedure after failed ERCP. We have previously published data on the case series (PMID 33140155) and here explored the cases performed after failed ERCP as a secondary procedure. We analyzed demographics of patients, preoperative investigations, ERCP trials, and reasons for ERCP failure, operative approach, duration of operation, conversion rate, complications, and outcomes. Twenty-two patients underwent a laparoscopic CBD clearance after failed ERCP. Sixteen of these were in the first 5 years of the study. Multiple attempts of ERCP were made in 7 patients (31.8%) and a single attempt in 15 patients. In 8 patients (32%), the duct was not accessible (failed cannulation) due to a variety of reasons. Nine patients had impacted stones larger than 1 cm, 4 patients had Mirrizi syndrome with concomitant large CBD stones, and 1 patient failed endoscopic clearance because of the large number of stones in the CBD. CBD clearance was successful in 19 patients (88%), 8 were completed by a transcystic approach and 14 by a transcholedochal approach. Postoperative length of stay was 12 (+10) days. One patient had an unplanned readmission within 30 days. One patient required reoperation for bleeding. Three patients developed recurrent stones and 1 developed a subsequent stricture. No mortalities were recorded. LCBDE is feasible and appears safe as a secondary procedure after failed ERCP. The new technologies and the advancement of surgical techniques will continue to improve success and reduce morbidity.
胆囊结石合并胆总管结石是一个常见问题,在治疗的最佳方法上仍未达成共识。治疗选择包括术前内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)、腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)联合胆总管探查以及LC术后行ERCP。每种选择都有其自身的局限性和并发症。在本文中,我们评估了ERCP失败后腹腔镜手术清除胆总管结石的可行性,以及我们队列中内镜清除失败的原因。我们将讨论ERCP失败后的治疗选择、挑战和结果。我们回顾性分析了2006年4月至2019年1月在我院进行的所有腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)病例。共进行了200例手术,其中178例为初次手术,22例为ERCP失败后的二次手术。我们之前已发表了该病例系列的数据(PMID 33140155),在此探讨作为二次手术的ERCP失败后进行的病例。我们分析了患者的人口统计学特征、术前检查、ERCP尝试情况、ERCP失败的原因、手术方式、手术时间、中转率、并发症和结果。22例患者在ERCP失败后接受了腹腔镜胆总管结石清除术。其中16例在研究的前5年。7例患者(31.8%)进行了多次ERCP尝试,15例患者进行了单次尝试。8例患者(32%)由于各种原因无法进入胆管(插管失败)。9例患者有大于1厘米的嵌顿结石,4例患者患有Mirrizi综合征并伴有较大的胆总管结石,1例患者因胆总管内结石数量众多而内镜清除失败。19例患者(88%)胆总管结石清除成功,8例通过经胆囊途径完成,14例通过经胆总管途径完成。术后住院时间为12(+10)天。1例患者在30天内意外再次入院。1例患者因出血需要再次手术。3例患者出现复发性结石,1例患者随后出现狭窄。无死亡病例记录。LCBDE作为ERCP失败后的二次手术是可行的,且似乎是安全的。新技术和手术技术的进步将继续提高成功率并降低发病率。