Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Dec;71(12):3711-3720. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18573. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
There is inconsistent evidence on the optimal time after standing to assess for orthostatic hypotension. We determined the prevalence of orthostatic hypotension at different time points after standing in a population of older adults, as well as fall risk and symptoms associated with orthostatic hypotension.
We performed a secondary analysis of the Study to Understand Fall Reduction and Vitamin D in You (STURDY), a randomized clinical trial funded by the National Institute on Aging, testing the effect of differing vitamin D3 doses on fall risk in older adults. STURDY occurred between July 2015 and May 2019. Secondary analysis occurred in 2022. Participants were community-dwelling adults, 70 years or older. In the orthostatic hypotension assessment, participants stood upright from supine position and underwent six standing blood pressure measurements (M1-M6) in two clusters of three measurements (immediately and 3 min after standing). Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the relationship between orthostatic hypotension at each measurement and subsequent falls. Participants were followed until the earlier of their 24-month visit or study completion.
Orthostatic hypotension occurred in 32% of assessments at M1, and only 16% at M5 and M6. Orthostatic hypotension from average immediate (M1-3) and average delayed (M4-6) measurements, respectively, predicted higher fall risk (M1-3 = 1.65 [1.08, 2.52]; M4-6 = 1.73 [1.03, 2.91]) (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]). However, among individual measurements, only orthostatic hypotension at M5 (1.84 [1.16, 2.93]) and M6 (1.85 [1.17, 2.91]) predicted higher fall risk. Participants with orthostatic hypotension at M1 (3.07 [1.48, 6.38]) and M2 (3.72 [1.72, 8.03]) were more likely to have reported orthostatic symptoms.
Orthostatic hypotension was most prevalent and symptomatic immediately within 1-2 min after standing, but more informative for fall risk after 4.5 min. Clinicians may consider both intervals when assessing for orthostatic hypotension.
目前对于直立后评估体位性低血压的最佳时间仍存在不一致的证据。我们旨在确定老年人直立后不同时间点体位性低血压的发生率,以及与体位性低血压相关的跌倒风险和症状。
我们对国家老龄化研究所资助的“理解跌倒减少和维生素 D 在老年人中的作用(STURDY)”进行了二次分析,这是一项测试不同维生素 D3 剂量对老年人跌倒风险影响的随机临床试验。STURDY 于 2015 年 7 月至 2019 年 5 月进行。二次分析于 2022 年进行。参与者为居住在社区的成年人,年龄在 70 岁或以上。在体位性低血压评估中,参与者从仰卧位直立,在两个 3 次测量的组中进行 6 次站立血压测量(M1-M6)。使用 Cox 比例风险模型来检查每个测量值与随后跌倒之间的关系。参与者随访至其 24 个月就诊或研究完成的较早时间。
在 M1 时,32%的评估出现体位性低血压,而仅在 M5 和 M6 时出现 16%。平均即刻(M1-3)和平均延迟(M4-6)测量的体位性低血压分别预测更高的跌倒风险(M1-3=1.65[1.08, 2.52];M4-6=1.73[1.03, 2.91])(风险比[95%置信区间])。然而,在个别测量中,只有 M5(1.84[1.16, 2.93])和 M6(1.85[1.17, 2.91])的体位性低血压预测更高的跌倒风险。在 M1(3.07[1.48, 6.38])和 M2(3.72[1.72, 8.03])时出现体位性低血压的参与者更有可能报告体位性症状。
直立后 1-2 分钟内即刻最常见且症状明显,但 4.5 分钟后更能预测跌倒风险。临床医生在评估体位性低血压时可能需要考虑这两个时间段。