• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学的核心认知责任:德尔菲研究的结果。

The core epistemic responsibilities of universities: Results from a Delphi study.

作者信息

Lechner I M, Mokkink L B, de Ridder G J, van Woudenberg R, Bouter L M, Tijdink J K

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Account Res. 2025 Feb;32(2):99-119. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2255826. Epub 2023 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1080/08989621.2023.2255826
PMID:37670686
Abstract

Epistemic responsibilities (ERs) of universities concern equipping and empowering its researchers, educators and students to attain, produce, exchange and disseminate knowledge. ERs can potentially guide universities in improving education, research and in service to society. Building on earlier philosophical work, we applied empirical methods to identify core ERs of universities and their constituting elements. We used a three-round Delphi survey, alternating between closed questions to gain consensus, and open questions to let panelists motivate their answers. 46 panelists participated in our study. We reached consensus on six ERs: 1) to foster research integrity, 2) to stimulate the development of intellectual virtues, 3) to address the big questions of life, 4) to cultivate the diversity of the disciplinary fields, 5) to serve and engage with society at large, and 6) to cultivate and safeguard academic freedom. Together the six ERs contain 27 elements. Consensus rates ranged from 73%-100% for both the ERs and their elements. Participants' detailed responses led to substantial improvements in the accompanying descriptions of the ERs. Our findings can inform the debate about the roles and responsibilities of universities, and inform researchers and policy makers to emphasize epistemic tasks of universities.

摘要

大学的认知责任(ERs)涉及使研究人员、教育工作者和学生具备并赋能他们去获取、创造、交流和传播知识。认知责任有可能指导大学在改善教育、研究以及服务社会方面的工作。基于早期的哲学研究成果,我们运用实证方法来确定大学的核心认知责任及其构成要素。我们开展了三轮德尔菲调查,在封闭式问题以达成共识和开放式问题以让小组成员阐述其答案之间交替进行。46位小组成员参与了我们的研究。我们就六项认知责任达成了共识:1)促进研究诚信,2)激发智识美德的发展,3)探讨人生重大问题,4)培育学科领域的多样性,5)服务并广泛参与社会,6)培育并维护学术自由。这六项认知责任共包含27个要素。认知责任及其要素的共识率在73%至100%之间。参与者的详细回答使对认知责任的相关描述有了实质性改进。我们的研究结果可为有关大学角色和责任的辩论提供参考,并告知研究人员和政策制定者去强调大学的认知任务。

相似文献

1
The core epistemic responsibilities of universities: Results from a Delphi study.大学的核心认知责任:德尔菲研究的结果。
Account Res. 2025 Feb;32(2):99-119. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2255826. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
2
Academia's Big Five: a normative taxonomy for the epistemic responsibilities of universities.学术界的五大要素:大学认知责任的规范分类法
F1000Res. 2019 Jun 13;8:862. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19459.2. eCollection 2019.
3
Roles, Responsibilities, and Expectations of Medical Students on Surgical Subinternships: A Modified Delphi Consensus Study.外科实习医师培训中医学生的角色、职责和期望:一项改良 Delphi 共识研究。
Acad Med. 2024 Aug 1;99(8):874-883. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005685. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
4
Developing consensus in identifying challenges of undergraduate orthodontic education in Malaysian public universities using e-Delphi.运用电子德尔菲法在马来西亚公立大学本科生正畸教育中达成共识,明确所面临的挑战。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2020 Aug;24(3):590-600. doi: 10.1111/eje.12540. Epub 2020 May 22.
5
Achieving Consensus Through a Modified Delphi Technique to Create the Post-concussion Collegiate Return-to-Learn Protocol.采用改良 Delphi 技术达成共识,制定脑震荡后大学生重返学习的协议。
Sports Med. 2023 Apr;53(4):903-916. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01788-8. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
6
Consensus-based statements for assessing clinical competency in podiatry-related work integrated learning.基于共识的评估足病相关工作综合学习临床能力的陈述。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Jul 19;16(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00639-7.
7
Establishing consensus for the core concepts of physiology in the Australian higher education context using the Delphi method.运用德尔菲法在澳大利亚高等教育背景下确立生理学核心概念的共识。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2023 Sep 1;47(3):419-426. doi: 10.1152/advan.00140.2022. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
8
Preapproval Information Exchange: Perspectives of U.S. Population Health Decision Makers on Preferences for Early Engagement with Investigational Therapies.预审批信息交流:美国人口健康决策制定者对早期参与试验性治疗偏好的观点。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Feb;25(2):164-173. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.2.164.
9
Update on occupational health nursing through 21st century requirements: A three-round Delphi study.更新 21 世纪职业健康护理要求:三轮德尔菲研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Jan;120:105657. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105657. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
10
Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process.界定掠夺性期刊并应对其带来的威胁:一项经过修正的德尔菲共识流程。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 9;10(2):e035561. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035561.

引用本文的文献

1
Expert Consensus Methods In The Humanities: An Exploration of their Potential.人文学科中的专家共识方法:对其潜力的探索
F1000Res. 2024 Dec 16;13:710. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.148726.2. eCollection 2024.