Lechner I M, Mokkink L B, de Ridder G J, van Woudenberg R, Bouter L M, Tijdink J K
Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Account Res. 2025 Feb;32(2):99-119. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2255826. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
Epistemic responsibilities (ERs) of universities concern equipping and empowering its researchers, educators and students to attain, produce, exchange and disseminate knowledge. ERs can potentially guide universities in improving education, research and in service to society. Building on earlier philosophical work, we applied empirical methods to identify core ERs of universities and their constituting elements. We used a three-round Delphi survey, alternating between closed questions to gain consensus, and open questions to let panelists motivate their answers. 46 panelists participated in our study. We reached consensus on six ERs: 1) to foster research integrity, 2) to stimulate the development of intellectual virtues, 3) to address the big questions of life, 4) to cultivate the diversity of the disciplinary fields, 5) to serve and engage with society at large, and 6) to cultivate and safeguard academic freedom. Together the six ERs contain 27 elements. Consensus rates ranged from 73%-100% for both the ERs and their elements. Participants' detailed responses led to substantial improvements in the accompanying descriptions of the ERs. Our findings can inform the debate about the roles and responsibilities of universities, and inform researchers and policy makers to emphasize epistemic tasks of universities.
大学的认知责任(ERs)涉及使研究人员、教育工作者和学生具备并赋能他们去获取、创造、交流和传播知识。认知责任有可能指导大学在改善教育、研究以及服务社会方面的工作。基于早期的哲学研究成果,我们运用实证方法来确定大学的核心认知责任及其构成要素。我们开展了三轮德尔菲调查,在封闭式问题以达成共识和开放式问题以让小组成员阐述其答案之间交替进行。46位小组成员参与了我们的研究。我们就六项认知责任达成了共识:1)促进研究诚信,2)激发智识美德的发展,3)探讨人生重大问题,4)培育学科领域的多样性,5)服务并广泛参与社会,6)培育并维护学术自由。这六项认知责任共包含27个要素。认知责任及其要素的共识率在73%至100%之间。参与者的详细回答使对认知责任的相关描述有了实质性改进。我们的研究结果可为有关大学角色和责任的辩论提供参考,并告知研究人员和政策制定者去强调大学的认知任务。