Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
JAMA Surg. 2023 Nov 1;158(11):e234154. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4154. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
Postoperative opioid overprescribing leads to persistent opioid use and excess pills at risk for misuse and diversion. A learning health system paradigm using risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathways (RSPCPs) may lead to reduction in inpatient and discharge opioid volume.
To analyze the outcomes of 2 iterative RSPCP updates on inpatient and discharge opioid volumes.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included 832 consecutive adult patients at an urban comprehensive cancer center who underwent pancreatic resection between October 2016 and April 2022, comprising 3 sequential pathway cohorts (version [V] 1, October 1, 2016, to January 31, 2019 [n = 363]; V2, February 1, 2019, to October 31, 2020 [n = 229]; V3, November 1, 2020, to April 30, 2022 [n = 240]).
After V1 of the pathway established a baseline and reduced length of stay (n = 363), V2 (n = 229) updated patient and surgeon education handouts, limited intravenous opioids, suggested a 3-drug (acetaminophen, celecoxib, methocarbamol) nonopioid bundle, and implemented the 5×-multiplier (last 24-hour oral morphine equivalents [OME] multiplied by 5) to calculate discharge volume. Pathway version 3 (n = 240) required the nonopioid bundle as default in the recovery room and scheduled conversion to oral medications on postoperative day 1.
Inpatient and discharge opioid volume in OME across the 3 RSPCPs were compared using nonparametric testing and trend analyses.
A total of 832 consecutive patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [56-72] years; 410 female [49.3%] and 422 male [50.7%]) underwent 541 pancreatoduodenectomies, 285 distal pancreatectomies, and 6 other pancreatectomies. Early nonopioid bundle administration increased from V1 (acetaminophen, 320 patients [88.2%]; celecoxib or anti-inflammatory, 98 patients [27.0%]; methocarbamol, 267 patients [73.6%]) to V3 (236 patients [98.3%], 163 patients [67.9%], and 238 patients [99.2%], respectively; P < .001). Total inpatient OME decreased from a median 290 mg (IQR, 157-468 mg) in V1 to 184 mg (IQR, 103-311 mg) in V2 to 129 mg (IQR, 75-206 mg) in V3 (P < .001). Discharge OME decreased from a median 150 mg (IQR, 100-225 mg) in V1 to 25 mg (IQR, 0-100 mg) in V2 to 0 mg (IQR, 0-50 mg) in V3 (P < .001). The percentage of patients discharged opioid free increased from 7.2% (26 of 363) in V1 to 52.5% (126 of 240) in V3 (P < .001), with 187 of 240 (77.9%) in V3 discharged with 50 mg OME or less. Median pain scores remained 3 or lower in all cohorts, with no differences in postdischarge refill requests. A subgroup analysis separating open and minimally invasive surgical cases showed similar results in both groups.
In this cohort study, the median total inpatient OME was halved and median discharge OME reduced to zero in association with a learning health system model of iterative opioid reduction that is freely adaptable by other hospitals. These findings suggest that opioid-free discharge after pancreatectomy and other major cancer operations is realistic and feasible with this no-cost blueprint.
术后阿片类药物过度开方会导致持续使用阿片类药物和过量的阿片类药物,这些药物存在滥用和转移的风险。使用风险分层胰腺切除术临床路径(RSPCP)的学习健康系统范例可能会减少住院和出院时的阿片类药物用量。
分析 2 次迭代 RSPCP 更新对住院和出院阿片类药物用量的影响。
设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究纳入了 2016 年 10 月至 2022 年 4 月期间在一家城市综合癌症中心接受胰腺切除术的 832 名连续成年患者,包括 3 个连续的路径组(第 1 版[V1],2016 年 10 月 1 日至 2019 年 1 月 31 日[n=363];第 2 版[V2],2019 年 2 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 31 日[n=229];第 3 版[V3],2020 年 11 月 1 日至 2022 年 4 月 30 日[n=240])。
在 V1 确定基线并缩短住院时间(n=363)后,V2(n=229)更新了患者和外科医生教育手册,限制了静脉内阿片类药物的使用,建议使用 3 种药物(对乙酰氨基酚、塞来昔布、甲氨蝶呤)非阿片类药物包,并实施 5 倍乘法(最后 24 小时口服吗啡等效物[OME]乘以 5)来计算出院量。V3 版(n=240)要求在恢复室默认使用非阿片类药物包,并计划在术后第 1 天转为口服药物。
使用非参数检验和趋势分析比较了 3 个 RSPCP 中住院和出院 OME 的阿片类药物用量。
共有 832 名连续患者(中位数[IQR]年龄为 65[56-72]岁;410 名女性[49.3%]和 422 名男性[50.7%])接受了 541 例胰十二指肠切除术、285 例胰体尾切除术和 6 例其他胰腺切除术。早期非阿片类药物包的使用从 V1(对乙酰氨基酚,320 例[88.2%];塞来昔布或抗炎药,98 例[27.0%];甲氨蝶呤,267 例[73.6%])增加到 V3(236 例[98.3%]、163 例[67.9%]和 238 例[99.2%],P<0.001)。住院 OME 的总量从 V1 的中位数 290mg(IQR,157-468mg)降至 V2 的 184mg(IQR,103-311mg),再降至 V3 的 129mg(IQR,75-206mg)(P<0.001)。出院 OME 的中位数从 V1 的 150mg(IQR,100-225mg)降至 V2 的 25mg(IQR,0-100mg),再降至 V3 的 0mg(IQR,0-50mg)(P<0.001)。从 V1 的 7.2%(26 例)增加到 V3 的 52.5%(126 例)(P<0.001),V3 中有 187 例(77.9%)出院时 OME 用量在 50mg 或以下,出院时无阿片类药物的患者比例增加。所有队列的中位疼痛评分均保持在 3 或以下,出院后补药请求无差异。亚组分析将开放和微创手术病例分开,两组均显示出相似的结果。
在这项队列研究中,住院期间 OME 的中位数减少了一半,出院时 OME 减少到零,这与迭代阿片类药物减少的学习健康系统模型有关,该模型可以由其他医院免费采用。这些发现表明,在没有成本的情况下,胰腺切除术和其他主要癌症手术后实现阿片类药物无残留出院是现实可行的。