Ma Lu, Yan Yating, Webb Richard James, Li Ying, Mehrabani Sanaz, Xin Bao, Sun Xiaomin, Wang Youfa, Mazidi Mohsen
Global Health Institute, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Global Health Institute, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China,
Neuropsychobiology. 2023;82(5):247-262. doi: 10.1159/000533131. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
The associations between psychological stress and gut microbiota composition are not fully understood. This study investigated associations between psychological stress and gut microbiota composition and examined the potential modifying effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on such associations.
A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Embase databases for studies published until November 2021 which examined associations between psychological stress and gut microbiota composition.
During the search process, 10,790 studies were identified, and after screening, 13 met the eligibility criteria and were included. The median sample size was 70, and the median age of participants was 28.0 years. Most of the included studies did not report associations between measures of alpha- and beta diversity of the gut microbiota composition and psychological stress. A few studies reported that the Shannon index, Chao 1, Simpson index, and weighted UniFrac were negatively associated with psychological stress. Significant reductions in several taxa at the phyla-, family-, and genus-levels were observed in participants with higher psychological stress. At the phylum level, the abundance of Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia were negatively associated with psychological stress. At the family-level, no more than two studies reported associations of the same microbiota with psychological stress. At the genus level, the following results were found in more than two studies; psychological stress was negatively associated with the abundance of Lachnospira, Lachnospiraceae, Phascolarctobacterium, Sutterella, and Veillonella, and positively associated with the abundance of Methanobrevibacter, Rhodococcus, and Roseburia. However, it was not possible to determine the influence of age, sex, or ethnicity due to the limited studies included.
Our findings provide evidence that psychological stress is associated with changes in the abundance of the gut microbiota. Larger sample longitudinal studies are needed to determine the causal relationship between psychological stress and the gut microbiota.
心理压力与肠道微生物群组成之间的关联尚未完全明确。本研究调查了心理压力与肠道微生物群组成之间的关联,并探讨了年龄、性别和种族对这种关联的潜在调节作用。
使用PubMed、Web of Science、PsycINFO和Embase数据库进行系统的文献检索,以查找截至2021年11月发表的研究心理压力与肠道微生物群组成之间关联的研究。
在检索过程中,共识别出10790项研究,经过筛选,13项符合纳入标准并被纳入。样本量中位数为70,参与者的年龄中位数为28.0岁。大多数纳入研究未报告肠道微生物群组成的α多样性和β多样性测量值与心理压力之间的关联。少数研究报告称,香农指数、Chao 1指数、辛普森指数和加权UniFrac与心理压力呈负相关。心理压力较高的参与者在门、科和属水平上的几个分类群数量显著减少。在门水平上,变形菌门和疣微菌门的丰度与心理压力呈负相关。在科水平上,不超过两项研究报告了相同微生物群与心理压力的关联。在属水平上,两项以上研究发现了以下结果;心理压力与毛螺菌属、毛螺菌科、考拉杆菌属、萨特氏菌属和韦荣球菌属的丰度呈负相关,与甲烷短杆菌属、红球菌属和罗斯氏菌属的丰度呈正相关。然而,由于纳入的研究有限,无法确定年龄、性别或种族的影响。
我们的研究结果提供了证据,表明心理压力与肠道微生物群丰度的变化有关。需要更大样本量的纵向研究来确定心理压力与肠道微生物群之间的因果关系。