Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing, China.
Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing, China.
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 6;13(9):e073219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073219.
An increasing number of studies have explored the clinical effects of antiglaucoma surgical procedures; however, economic evidence was scarce. We aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness between maximal medical treatment (MMT) and commonly used surgical procedures (trabeculectomy, Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation, gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy and ab interno canaloplasty).
A Markov model study.
A hypothetical cohort of 100 000 patients with mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).
Data were obtained from public sources. The main outcomes were incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to verify the robustness and sensitivity of base-case results.
Both cumulative costs and QALYs gained from surgical procedures (US$6045-US$13 598, 3.33-6.05 QALYs) were higher than those from MMT (US$3117-US$6458, 3.14-5.66 QALYs). Compared with MMT, all surgical procedures satisfied the cost-effectiveness threshold (lower than US$30 501 and US$41 568 per QALY gained in rural and urban settings, respectively). During the 5-year period, trabeculectomy produced the lowest ICUR (US$21 462 and US$15 242 per QALY gained in rural and urban settings, respectively). During the 10-year-follow-up, trabeculectomy still produced the lowest ICUR (US$13 379 per QALY gained) in urban setting; however, gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (US$19 619 per QALY gained) and ab interno canaloplasty (US$18 003 per QALY gained) produced lower ICURs than trabeculectomy (US$19 675 per QALY gained) in rural areas. Base-case results were most sensitive to the utilities and costs of initial treatment and maintenance.
The long-term cost-effectiveness of commonly used surgical procedures could be better than the short-term cost-effectiveness for mild-to-moderate POAG patients in China. Health economic studies, supported by more rigorous structured real-world data, are needed to assess their everyday cost-effectiveness.
越来越多的研究探索了抗青光眼手术的临床效果,但经济证据却很少。本研究旨在比较最大药物治疗(MMT)与常用手术(小梁切除术、 Ahmed 青光眼引流阀植入术、房角切开术和经内路小梁切开术)之间的成本效益。
Markov 模型研究。
100000 例轻中度原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者的假设队列。
数据来自公共资源。主要结局指标为使用质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本效用比(ICUR)。进行敏感性分析以验证基础结果的稳健性和敏感性。
手术治疗的累积成本和获得的 QALYs(3336 美元至 13598 美元,3.33 至 6.05 个 QALY)均高于 MMT(3117 美元至 6458 美元,3.14 至 5.66 个 QALY)。与 MMT 相比,所有手术治疗均符合成本效益阈值(农村和城市地区分别低于每获得 1 个 QALY 的 30501 美元和 41568 美元)。在 5 年期间,小梁切除术的 ICUR 最低(农村和城市地区分别为 21462 美元和 15242 美元/QALY)。在 10 年随访期间,小梁切除术在城市地区仍产生最低的 ICUR(每获得 1 个 QALY 为 13379 美元);然而,在农村地区,房角切开术(每获得 1 个 QALY 为 19619 美元)和经内路小梁切开术(每获得 1 个 QALY 为 18003 美元)的 ICUR 均低于小梁切除术(每获得 1 个 QALY 为 19675 美元)。基础结果对初始治疗和维持的效用和成本最为敏感。
对于中国轻中度 POAG 患者,常用手术的长期成本效益可能优于短期成本效益。需要健康经济研究,支持更严格的结构化真实世界数据,以评估其日常成本效益。