• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院环境中青光眼的共享护理与虚拟诊所

Shared Care and Virtual Clinics for Glaucoma in a Hospital Setting.

作者信息

Simons Anne-Sophie, Vercauteren Julie, Barbosa-Breda João, Stalmans Ingeborg

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 19;10(20):4785. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204785.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10204785
PMID:34682908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8538177/
Abstract

Glaucoma patients require lifelong management, and the prevalence of glaucoma is expected to increase, resulting in capacity problems in many hospital eye departments. New models of care delivery are needed to offer requisite capacity. This review evaluates two alternative schemes for glaucoma care within a hospital, i.e., shared care (SC) and virtual clinics (VCs), whereby non-medical staff are entrusted with more responsibilities, and compares these schemes with the "traditional" ophthalmologist-led outpatient service (standard care). A literature search was conducted in three large bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Trip), and the abstracts from the prior five annual meetings of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology were consulted. Twenty-nine were included in the review (14 on SC and 15 on VCs). Patients with low risk of vision loss were considered suitable for these approaches. Among the non-medical staff, optometrists were the most frequently involved. The quality of both schemes was good and improved with the non-medical staff being trained in glaucoma care. No evidence was found on patients feeling disadvantaged by the lack of a doctor visit. Both schemes increased the hospital's efficiency. Both SC and VCs are promising approaches to tackle the upcoming capacity problems of hospital-based glaucoma care.

摘要

青光眼患者需要终身治疗,而且青光眼的患病率预计会上升,这将导致许多医院眼科出现治疗能力问题。因此需要新的护理模式来提供所需的治疗能力。本综述评估了医院内两种青光眼护理替代方案,即共享护理(SC)和虚拟诊所(VC),在这两种方案中,非医务人员被赋予了更多职责,并将这些方案与“传统的”由眼科医生主导的门诊服务(标准护理)进行了比较。我们在三个大型文献数据库(PubMed、Embase和Trip)中进行了文献检索,并查阅了视觉与眼科学研究协会前五次年会的摘要。本综述纳入了29项研究(14项关于共享护理,15项关于虚拟诊所)。视力丧失风险较低的患者被认为适合采用这些方法。在非医务人员中,验光师参与最为频繁。两种方案的质量都很好,并且随着非医务人员接受青光眼护理培训而有所提高。没有证据表明患者因没有看医生而处于不利地位。两种方案都提高了医院的效率。共享护理和虚拟诊所都是解决即将出现的医院青光眼护理能力问题的有前景的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3007/8538177/8870848c4722/jcm-10-04785-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3007/8538177/0621ec4de1cc/jcm-10-04785-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3007/8538177/8870848c4722/jcm-10-04785-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3007/8538177/0621ec4de1cc/jcm-10-04785-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3007/8538177/8870848c4722/jcm-10-04785-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Shared Care and Virtual Clinics for Glaucoma in a Hospital Setting.医院环境中青光眼的共享护理与虚拟诊所
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 19;10(20):4785. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204785.
2
Glaucoma referral refinement in Ireland: managing the sensitivity-specificity paradox in optometric practice.爱尔兰青光眼转诊优化:应对验光实践中的敏感度-特异度悖论
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018 Jul;38(4):400-410. doi: 10.1111/opo.12446. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
3
Service innovation in glaucoma management: using a Web-based electronic patient record to facilitate virtual specialist supervision of a shared care glaucoma programme.青光眼管理中的服务创新:利用基于网络的电子病历促进共享照护青光眼项目的虚拟专家监督。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Mar;99(3):313-7. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305588. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
4
The Portsmouth-based glaucoma refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future?朴茨茅斯青光眼精化方案:虚拟诊所未来的作用?
Eye (Lond). 2012 Oct;26(10):1288-94. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.120. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
5
The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study: reliability of community optometric and hospital eye service test measures.布里斯托尔共享护理青光眼研究:社区验光和医院眼科服务检测措施的可靠性
Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jun;83(6):707-12. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.6.707.
6
Virtual glaucoma clinics: patient acceptance and quality of patient education compared to standard clinics.虚拟青光眼诊所:与标准诊所相比,患者的接受度及患者教育质量
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr 24;9:745-9. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S75000. eCollection 2015.
7
The Peterborough scheme for community specialist optometrists in glaucoma: results of 4 years of a two-tiered community-based assessment and follow-up service.彼得伯勒社区青光眼专科验光师计划:基于社区的两级评估和随访服务4年的结果
Curr Eye Res. 2015 Jul;40(7):690-6. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2014.957326. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
8
The value of virtual glaucoma clinics: a review.虚拟青光眼诊所的价值:综述。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Jul;38(10):1840-1844. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03056-7. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
9
A technician-delivered 'virtual clinic' for triaging low-risk glaucoma referrals.一种由技术人员提供的用于对低风险青光眼转诊病例进行分诊的“虚拟诊所”。
Eye (Lond). 2017 Jun;31(6):899-905. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.9. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
10
Improving the quality of eye care with tele-ophthalmology: shared-care glaucoma screening.通过远程眼科提高眼保健质量:共享护理青光眼筛查
J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10(6):331-6. doi: 10.1258/1357633042602107.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary Eyecare Glaucoma Service (PEGS): a mixed methods service evaluation.原发性眼保健青光眼服务(PEGS):一项混合方法的服务评估
Eye (Lond). 2024 Dec;38(18):3481-3487. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03335-3. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
2
Comparative outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty delivered by optometrists compared with ophthalmologists: a UK-based multicentre observational study.验光师与眼科医生进行选择性激光小梁成形术的比较结果:一项基于英国的多中心观察性研究。
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 2;9(1):e001870. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001870.
3
Going for Gaps in Glaucoma.

本文引用的文献

1
Expansion of patient eligibility for virtual glaucoma clinics: a long-term strategy to increase the capacity of high-quality glaucoma care.扩大虚拟青光眼诊所的患者资格:提高高质量青光眼护理能力的长期策略。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan;107(1):43-48. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318556. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
2
Virtual clinics for glaucoma care - Patients' and clinicians' experiences and perceptions: a qualitative evaluation.青光眼护理虚拟诊所——患者和临床医生的体验和看法:定性评估。
Eye (Lond). 2022 Jan;36(1):209-218. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01467-4. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
3
Knowledge of Glaucoma Among Patients Attending Virtual and Face-to-Face Glaucoma Clinics.
探寻青光眼的盲点
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 24;12(17):5494. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175494.
4
Cost-utility analysis of commonly used anti-glaucoma interventions for mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma patients in rural and urban China.中国农村和城市轻中度原发性开角型青光眼患者常用抗青光眼干预措施的成本-效用分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 6;13(9):e073219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073219.
5
A Quality Assurance Audit of an Orthoptic-Led Virtual Neuro-Ophthalmology Clinic.由斜视弱视专科主导的虚拟神经眼科诊所的质量保证审计
Br Ir Orthopt J. 2023 Mar 10;19(1):7-14. doi: 10.22599/bioj.289. eCollection 2023.
参加虚拟和面对面青光眼诊所的患者对青光眼的认知。
J Glaucoma. 2021 Apr 1;30(4):325-331. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001758.
4
Patient satisfaction with the virtual glaucoma clinic.患者对虚拟青光眼诊所的满意度。
Eye (Lond). 2021 Mar;35(3):1017-1018. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-0946-5. Epub 2020 May 12.
5
What is the best way to measure intraocular pressure (IOP) in a virtual clinic?在虚拟诊所中,测量眼压(IOP)的最佳方法是什么?
Eye (Lond). 2021 Feb;35(2):448-454. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-0868-2. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
6
Anterior Chamber Angle Evaluation Using Gonioscopy: Consistency and Agreement between Optometrists and Ophthalmologists.使用前房角镜评估前房角:验光师与眼科医生之间的一致性和一致性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Oct;96(10):751-760. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001432.
7
Approach to collaborative glaucoma care in New Zealand: An update.新西兰青光眼协作护理方法:最新进展
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug;47(6):798-799. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13485. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
8
A virtual clinic to improve long-term outcomes in chronic kidney disease.虚拟诊所改善慢性肾脏病的长期预后。
Clin Med (Lond). 2018 Oct;18(5):356-363. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-5-356.
9
Healthcare Utilization by Glaucoma Patients in a Team Care Model.团队照护模式下青光眼患者的医疗服务利用情况
Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33(7-8):829-837. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2018.1514059. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
10
Provider Agreement in the Assessment of Glaucoma Progression Within a Team Model.在团队模式下评估青光眼进展中的提供者协议。
J Glaucoma. 2018 Aug;27(8):691-698. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000994.