Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Robert Larner, M.D. College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA.
Virology Division, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 6;13(1):14683. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39232-0.
Previous studies have documented natural infections of SARS-CoV-2 in various domestic and wild animals. More recently, studies have been published noting the susceptibility of members of the Cervidae family, and infections in both wild and captive cervid populations. In this study, we investigated the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in mammalian wildlife within the state of Vermont. 739 nasal or throat samples were collected from wildlife throughout the state during the 2021 and 2022 harvest season. Data was collected from red and gray foxes (Vulpes vulples and Urocyon cineroargentus, respectively), fishers (Martes pennati), river otters (Lutra canadensis), coyotes (Canis lantrans), bobcats (Lynx rufus rufus), black bears (Ursus americanus), and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Samples were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 via quantitative RT-qPCR using the CDC N1/N2 primer set and/or the WHO-E gene primer set. Surprisingly, we initially detected a number of N1 and/or N2 positive samples with high cycle threshold values, though after conducting environmental swabbing of the laboratory and verifying with a second independent primer set (WHO-E) and PCR without reverse transcriptase, we showed that these were false positives due to plasmid contamination from a construct expressing the N gene in the general laboratory environment. Our final results indicate that no sampled wildlife were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, and highlight the importance of physically separate locations for the processing of samples for surveillance and experiments that require the use of plasmid DNA containing the target RNA sequence. These negative findings are surprising, given that most published North America studies have found SARS-CoV-2 within their deer populations. The absence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in populations sampled here may provide insights in to the various environmental and anthropogenic factors that reduce spillover and spread in North American's wildlife populations.
先前的研究已经记录了 SARS-CoV-2 在各种家养和野生动物中的自然感染。最近,有研究报道了鹿科动物的易感性,以及野生动物和圈养鹿种群中的感染。在这项研究中,我们调查了佛蒙特州内哺乳动物野生动物中 SARS-CoV-2 的存在情况。在 2021 年和 2022 年的收获季节,从全州各地的野生动物身上采集了 739 个鼻或咽喉样本。数据来自红狐(Vulpes vulpes)和灰狐(Urocyon cineroargentus)、渔貂(Martes pennati)、河狸(Lutra canadensis)、郊狼(Canis lantrans)、山猫(Lynx rufus rufus)、黑熊(Ursus americanus)和白尾鹿(Odocoileus virginianus)。使用 CDC N1/N2 引物组和/或世卫组织 E 基因引物组,通过定量 RT-qPCR 检测样本中 SARS-CoV-2 的存在情况。令人惊讶的是,我们最初检测到了一些 N1 和/或 N2 阳性样本,其循环阈值很高,但在对实验室进行环境拭子采样并使用第二组独立引物(世卫组织 E 基因)和无逆转录酶的 PCR 进行验证后,我们表明这些是由于质粒污染造成的,该质粒在一般实验室环境中表达 N 基因。我们的最终结果表明,没有采样的野生动物对 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 呈阳性,这突出了为监测和需要使用含有目标 RNA 序列的质粒 DNA 的实验处理样本时,物理上分开的地点的重要性。这些阴性发现令人惊讶,因为大多数已发表的北美研究都在其鹿种群中发现了 SARS-CoV-2。在这里采样的种群中没有 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 的存在,这可能为了解减少北美野生动物种群中溢出和传播的各种环境和人为因素提供了线索。