Doidge Charlotte, Frössling Jenny, Dórea Fernanda C, Ordell Anna, Vidal Gema, Kaler Jasmeet
School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Department of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Aug 22;10:1171107. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1171107. eCollection 2023.
Livestock farmers are being increasingly encouraged to adopt digital health technologies on their farms. Digital innovations may have unintended consequences, but there tends to be a pro-innovation bias in previous literature. This has led to a movement towards "responsible innovation," an approach that questions the social and ethical challenges of research and innovation. This paper explores the social and ethical issues of data and technologies on Swedish dairy and pig farms from a critical perspective.
Six focus groups were conducted with thirteen dairy and thirteen pig farmers. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and a digital critical health lens, which focuses on concepts of identity and power.
The analysis generated four themes: extending the self, sense of agency, quantifying animals, and managing human labour. The findings suggest that technologies can change and form the identities of farmers, their workers, and animals by increasing the visibility of behaviours and bodies through data collection. Technologies can also facilitate techniques of power such as conforming to norms, hierarchical surveillance, and segregation of populations based on data. There were many contradictions in the way that technology was used on farms which suggests that farmers cannot be dichotomised into those who are opposed to and those that support adoption of technologies. Emotions and morality played an important role in the way animals were managed and technologies were used by farmers. Thus, when developing innovations, we need to consider users' feelings and attachments towards the technologies. Technologies have different impacts on farmers and farm workers which suggests that we need to ensure that we understand the perspectives of multiple user groups when developing innovations, including those that might be least empowered.
越来越多的人鼓励畜牧养殖户在其农场采用数字健康技术。数字创新可能会产生意想不到的后果,但以往的文献往往存在支持创新的偏见。这导致了一种向“负责任创新”的转变,这种方法对研究和创新的社会及伦理挑战提出了质疑。本文从批判性视角探讨了瑞典奶牛场和养猪场中数据与技术的社会及伦理问题。
与13位奶牛养殖户和13位养猪养殖户进行了6次焦点小组讨论。使用反思性主题分析和数字批判性健康视角对数据进行分析,该视角关注身份和权力概念。
分析产生了四个主题:扩展自我、能动性意识、量化动物以及管理人力。研究结果表明,技术可以通过数据收集增加行为和身体的可见性,从而改变并塑造养殖户、他们的工人以及动物的身份。技术还可以促进权力技术,例如遵守规范、层级监督以及基于数据的人群隔离。农场使用技术的方式存在许多矛盾之处,这表明不能将养殖户简单地分为反对和支持采用技术的两类人。情感和道德在动物管理方式以及养殖户使用技术的方式中发挥了重要作用。因此,在开发创新时,我们需要考虑用户对技术的感受和情感依附。技术对养殖户和农场工人有不同的影响,这表明在开发创新时,我们需要确保理解多个用户群体的观点,包括那些可能最缺乏权力的群体。