Cagnotti Giulia, Ferrini Sara, Di Muro Giorgia, Avilii Eleonora, Favole Alessandra, D'Angelo Antonio
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Istituto Zooprofilattico del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d'Aosta, Turin, Italy.
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Aug 22;10:1247100. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1247100. eCollection 2023.
Constant rate infusion (CRI) of benzodiazepines or propofol (PPF) is a therapeutic option for cluster seizures (CS) and status epilepticus (SE) in canine patients non-responding to first-line benzodiazepines or non-anesthetics. However, specific indications for optimal duration of CRI are lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of duration of anesthetic CRI on outcome and length of hospital stay in dogs with refractory seizure activity of different etiology.
Open-label non-randomized clinical trial.
Seventy-three client-owned dogs were enrolled. Two groups [experimental (EXP) vs. control (CTRL)] were compared. The EXP group received diazepam (DZP) or PPF CRI for 12 h (±1 h) and the CTRL group received DZP or PPF CRI for 24 h (±1 h) in addition to a standardized emergency treatment protocol identical for both study groups. The historical control group was made up of a population of dogs already reported in a previously published paper by the same authors. Favorable outcome was defined as seizure cessation after CRI, no seizure recurrence, and clinical recovery. Poor outcome was defined as seizure recurrence, death in hospital or no return to acceptable clinical baseline. Univariate statistical analysis was performed.
The study sample was 73 dogs: 45 (62%) received DZP CRI and 28 (38%) received PPF CRI. The EXP group was 39 dogs (25 DZP CRI and 14 PPF CRI) and the CTRL group 34 dogs (20 DZP CRI and 14 PPF CRI). We found no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the groups. The median length of stay was 56 h (IQR, 40-78) for the ALL EXP group and 58.5 h (IQR, 48-74.5) for the ALL CTRL group ( = 0.8).
Even though a shorter DZP or PPF CRI duration was not associated with a worse outcome, the study failed to identify a clear superiority of shorter CRI duration on outcome or length of hospital stay in dogs with refractory seizure activity of different etiology.
对于对一线苯二氮䓬类药物或非麻醉药物无反应的犬类患者,持续输注苯二氮䓬类药物或丙泊酚(PPF)是治疗丛集性癫痫发作(CS)和癫痫持续状态(SE)的一种治疗选择。然而,缺乏关于持续输注最佳时长的具体指征。本研究的目的是确定麻醉持续输注时长对不同病因的难治性癫痫发作活动犬的预后和住院时间的影响。
开放标签非随机临床试验。
纳入73只宠物犬。比较两组[试验组(EXP)与对照组(CTRL)]。试验组接受地西泮(DZP)或PPF持续输注12小时(±1小时),对照组除接受与两个研究组相同的标准化急救治疗方案外,还接受DZP或PPF持续输注24小时(±1小时)。历史对照组由同一作者先前发表的一篇论文中已报道的犬类群体组成。良好预后定义为持续输注后癫痫发作停止、无癫痫复发且临床恢复。不良预后定义为癫痫复发、在医院死亡或未恢复到可接受的临床基线。进行单变量统计分析。
研究样本为73只犬:45只(62%)接受DZP持续输注,28只(38%)接受PPF持续输注。试验组39只犬(25只接受DZP持续输注,14只接受PPF持续输注),对照组34只犬(20只接受DZP持续输注,14只接受PPF持续输注)。我们发现两组之间的预后无统计学显著差异。所有试验组的中位住院时间为56小时(四分位间距,40 - 78),所有对照组为58.5小时(四分位间距,48 - 74.5)(P = 0.8)。
尽管较短的DZP或PPF持续输注时长与较差的预后无关,但该研究未能确定较短的持续输注时长在不同病因的难治性癫痫发作活动犬的预后或住院时间方面具有明显优势。