Streck Júlia Niero Zanatta, Arcaro Sabrina, Ceretta Renan Antônio, Bortoluzzi Eduardo Antunes, Garcia Lucas da Fonseca Roberti, de Almeida Josiane, Kopper Patrícia Maria Poli, Bernardi Anarela Vassen
Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Extreme Southern Santa Catarina, Criciúma, SC, Brazil.
Department of Diagnosis & Oral Health, Division of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Restor Dent Endod. 2023 Jun 8;48(3):e22. doi: 10.5395/rde.2023.48.e22. eCollection 2023 Aug.
This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the tip and taper compatibility of accessory gutta-percha points (AGPs) with various rotary and reciprocating instruments.
Using a profile analyzer, tip and taper measurements were taken of 10 AGPs of each of the 14 models available from Odous de Deus and the 4 models available from Dentsply-Maillefer. Diameter measurements were taken at 1-mm intervals, from 3 mm from the tip (D3) to 16 mm.
Based on the mean values obtained, 3-dimensional (3D) models of the AGPs were drawn in Autodesk Fusion 360 and superimposed on 3D models of each instrument selected (Mtwo, Reciproc, RaCe, K3, and ProDesign Logic) to determine the compatibility between the instrument and the AGP. Data corresponding to the tips and tapers of the various AGPs, as well as the tip and taper differences between the AGPs and the instruments, were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The tapers of the AGPs were subject to the American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association No. 57 standard. The Odous de Deus extra-long medium and extra-long extra-medium AGPs were shown to be compatible with Mtwo, K3, and ProDesign Logic instruments with taper 0.06 and tip sizes 25 and 30, while the Dentsply fine and fine medium cones were compatible with Mtwo, RaCe, and K3 instruments with conicity of 0.04 and tip sizes 35 and 40.
Both the Odous de Deus and Dentsply commercial brands included 2 AGP models with tip (D3) and taper compatibility with Mtwo, RaCe, K3, and/or Prodesign Logic instruments.
本研究旨在评估和比较辅助牙胶尖(AGP)与各种旋转和往复式器械的尖端及锥度兼容性。
使用轮廓分析仪,对来自奥德乌斯·德·迪乌斯公司的14种型号以及登士柏 - 迈耶费尔公司的4种型号中每种型号的10个AGP进行尖端和锥度测量。直径测量在距尖端3毫米(D3)至16毫米之间每隔1毫米进行一次。
根据所获得的平均值,在Autodesk Fusion 360中绘制AGP的三维(3D)模型,并将其叠加在所选的每种器械(Mtwo、Reciproc、RaCe、K3和ProDesign Logic)的3D模型上,以确定器械与AGP之间的兼容性。使用描述性统计分析各种AGP的尖端和锥度数据,以及AGP与器械之间的尖端和锥度差异。AGP的锥度符合美国国家标准学会/美国牙科协会第57号标准。结果显示,奥德乌斯·德·迪乌斯公司的超长中号和超长长号AGP与锥度为0.06、尖端尺寸为25和30的Mtwo、K3和ProDesign Logic器械兼容,而登士柏公司的细号和细中号牙胶尖与锥度为0.04、尖端尺寸为35和40的Mtwo、RaCe和K3器械兼容。
奥德乌斯·德·迪乌斯公司和登士柏公司的商业品牌均包含2种AGP型号,其尖端(D3)和锥度与Mtwo、RaCe、K3和/或Prodesign Logic器械兼容。