• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生产-生活-生态空间的定性-定量识别与功能分区分析——以滇中城市群为例。

Qualitative-quantitative identification and functional zoning analysis of production-living-ecological space: a case study of Urban Agglomeration in Central Yunnan, China.

机构信息

Faculty of Land Resource Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650093, China.

Yunnan Institute of Land Resources Planning and Design, Yunnan Geological Survey, Kunming, 650051, China.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Sep 7;195(10):1163. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11716-6.

DOI:10.1007/s10661-023-11716-6
PMID:37676307
Abstract

Territorial space exhibits multiple functional attributes, which comprise production, living, and ecological functions usually. Optimizing the production-living-ecological space (PLES) has become the key to territorial and spatial planning; the scientific identification of the PLES lays a foundation for space optimization and has important guiding significance in territorial spatial zoning. To achieve the integration of macro-scale and micro-scale PLES, with the Urban Agglomeration in Central Yunnan as the research area in this study, the PLES functional identification systems from the administrative unit scale and the grid scale are constructed. The types of PLES are determined by integrating qualitative and quantitative evaluation results and using an improved primacy index model from a composite spatial perspective. On that basis, the division of comprehensive zoning is achieved for land use functions through kernel density analysis. As indicated by the results, the model is capable of reflecting the macro background of the PLES functions in administrative regions while characterizing the micro differences at the grid level in administrative units. There are significant differences in the production, living, and ecological functional spaces in the Urban Agglomeration. Production functions are concentrated in the central and northeastern, living functions are concentrated in the central, and ecological functions are concentrated in the western and northeastern, with significantly consistent or complementary spatial distributions of each other. The PLES of Urban Agglomeration includes production space (PS), ecological space (ES), production-living space (P-LS), production-ecological space (P-ES), living-ecological space (L-ES), and production-living-ecological space (P-L-ES), placing a focus on ES, P-ES, and P-L-ES, which marks significant differences in spatial distribution among different spatial types. The study area is divided into 24 functional zones, which are classified into 6 categories, and optimization paths are proposed. This study will provide a reference for territorial and spatial planning in spatial functional zoning, spatial pattern optimization, and land management applications.

摘要

地域空间具有多种功能属性,通常包括生产、生活和生态功能。优化生产-生活-生态空间(PLES)已成为国土空间规划的关键;PLES 的科学识别为空间优化奠定了基础,对国土空间分区具有重要的指导意义。为了实现宏观尺度和微观尺度 PLES 的融合,本研究以滇中城市群为研究区域,构建了从行政单元尺度和网格尺度的 PLES 功能识别体系。通过综合定性和定量评价结果,并采用改进的优先指数模型,从综合空间角度确定 PLES 类型。在此基础上,通过核密度分析实现土地利用功能的综合分区。结果表明,该模型能够反映行政区域 PLES 功能的宏观背景,同时刻画行政单元网格尺度的微观差异。滇中城市群生产、生活和生态功能空间差异显著。生产功能集中在中东部和东北部,生活功能集中在中部,生态功能集中在西部和东北部,彼此之间存在明显一致或互补的空间分布。城市群 PLES 包括生产空间(PS)、生态空间(ES)、生产-生活空间(P-LS)、生产-生态空间(P-ES)、生活-生态空间(L-ES)和生产-生活-生态空间(P-L-ES),重点关注 ES、P-ES 和 P-L-ES,这标志着不同空间类型之间的空间分布存在显著差异。研究区分为 24 个功能区,分为 6 类,并提出了优化路径。本研究将为空间功能分区、空间格局优化和土地管理应用中的国土空间规划提供参考。

相似文献

1
Qualitative-quantitative identification and functional zoning analysis of production-living-ecological space: a case study of Urban Agglomeration in Central Yunnan, China.生产-生活-生态空间的定性-定量识别与功能分区分析——以滇中城市群为例。
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Sep 7;195(10):1163. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11716-6.
2
Spatiotemporal Evolution and Regional Differences in the Production-Living-Ecological Space of the Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River.长江中游城市群生产-生活-生态空间的时空演化及区域差异
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 27;18(23):12497. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312497.
3
Spatial correlation analysis and prediction of carbon stock of "Production-living-ecological spaces" in the three northeastern provinces, China.中国东北三省“三生空间”碳储量的空间相关性分析与预测
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 6;9(8):e18923. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18923. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Spatial Transformation Characteristics and Conflict Measurement of Production-Living-Ecology: Evidence from Urban Agglomeration of China.生产-生活-生态空间的演变特征与冲突测度——来自中国城市群的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;19(3):1458. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031458.
5
Spatio-Temporal Variation and Influencing Factors of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China.中国生产-生活-生态空间耦合协调度的时空演变及其影响因素
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 20;19(16):10370. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610370.
6
Effects of production-living-ecological space changes on the ecosystem service value of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration in China.生产-生活-生态空间变化对中国长江三角洲城市群生态系统服务价值的影响。
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Sep 1;195(9):1133. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11702-y.
7
Ecological security assessment of Yunnan Province, China in the context of Production-Living-Ecological space division.基于生产-生活-生态空间划分背景下的中国云南省生态安全评估
Ecol Evol. 2024 Aug 9;14(8):e70131. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70131. eCollection 2024 Aug.
8
Assessing production-living-ecological spaces and its urban-rural gradients in Xiangyang City, China: insights from land-use function symbiosis.评估中国襄阳市的生产-生活-生态空间及其城乡梯度:土地利用功能共生的启示。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(9):13688-13705. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-31957-3. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
9
Evolution Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China: Perspective of Main Function Zones.中国生产-生活-生态空间演化特征与形成机制——主体功能区视角
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;19(16):9910. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169910.
10
Optimizing the spatial pattern of land use in a prominent grain-producing area: A sustainable development perspective.优化粮食主产区土地利用空间格局——基于可持续发展视角
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Oct 15;843:156971. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156971. Epub 2022 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on the carrying capacity of production, living and ecological space and its coupling coordination in Duolun County, Inner Mongolia.内蒙古多伦县生产、生活和生态空间承载能力及其耦合协调性研究
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0309615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309615. eCollection 2024.
2
Assessing production-living-ecological spaces and its urban-rural gradients in Xiangyang City, China: insights from land-use function symbiosis.评估中国襄阳市的生产-生活-生态空间及其城乡梯度:土地利用功能共生的启示。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(9):13688-13705. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-31957-3. Epub 2024 Jan 23.