Suppr超能文献

比较前上入路和三角肌胸大肌入路在退行性肩肱关节炎反式全肩关节置换术中的疗效:一项系统评价

Comparing outcomes of the anterosuperior and deltopectoral approaches in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for degenerative glenohumeral arthritis: a systematic review.

作者信息

Waugh Christopher A, Onggo James R, Donald Simon

机构信息

Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Queensland Health, 6 Doherty St, Birtinya, QLD, Australia.

Box Hill Hospital, Eastern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jan;34(1):641-646. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03683-y. Epub 2023 Sep 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Reverse total shoulder replacement (rTSR) improves pain and function in patients with a wide range of shoulder pathology. Anterosuperior (AS) and deltopectoral (DP) approaches are widely used to gain access to the glenohumeral joint in arthroplasty. Our aim was to systematically review the literature comparing outcomes of these two approaches when performing rTSR for degenerative glenohumeral arthritis.

METHODS

Systematic review was performed with an electronic multi-database search (Pubmed, Medline & Embase) according to PRISMA guidelines on 18th September 2022. Data from published studies of any study design that met the inclusion criteria were extracted, reviewed and synthesized.

RESULTS

A total of 38 studies were identified for full text review, of which four were included. No significant difference in pain and range of motion were observed between approaches. Scapular notching was more common in the anterosuperior approach. Low rates of instability and intra-operative fracture were observed in both.

CONCLUSION

Both approaches demonstrate similar clinical outcomes with reference to pain, range of motion and complications when performing rTSR indicated for degenerative joint disease. However, further well-designed studies are required.

摘要

目的

反式全肩关节置换术(rTSR)可改善多种肩部病变患者的疼痛和功能。前上方(AS)入路和三角肌胸大肌(DP)入路在关节置换术中被广泛用于进入盂肱关节。我们的目的是系统回顾比较在退行性盂肱关节炎行rTSR时这两种入路疗效的文献。

方法

根据PRISMA指南于2022年9月18日进行电子多数据库检索(PubMed、Medline和Embase),以进行系统回顾。提取、审查并综合符合纳入标准的任何研究设计的已发表研究数据。

结果

共确定38项研究进行全文审查,其中4项被纳入。两种入路在疼痛和活动范围方面未观察到显著差异。肩胛切迹在前上方入路中更常见。两种入路的不稳定和术中骨折发生率均较低。

结论

对于因退行性关节疾病而行rTSR时,两种入路在疼痛、活动范围和并发症方面均显示出相似的临床疗效。然而,需要进一步设计良好的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验