• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性肾脏病合并持久左心室辅助装置患者心脏-肾脏联合移植术后的生存情况:2018 年心脏分配政策变化的影响。

Survival After Simultaneous Heart-kidney Transplant in Recipients With a Durable LVAD and Chronic Kidney Disease: Effect of the 2018 Heart Allocation Policy Change.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2024 Feb 1;108(2):524-529. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004781. Epub 2023 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000004781
PMID:37677944
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heart transplantation remains the most definitive therapy for qualified candidates with end-stage heart failure. Concomitant kidney disease is common in this population prompting an increase in simultaneous heart-kidney (SHK) transplantation in recent years. The goal of our study was to explore the effects of the 2018 heart allocation policy (HAP) change on candidate listing characteristics and compare survival rates at 1 y in patients that were supported with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) pretransplant and underwent SHK or heart alone transplant (HAT).

METHODS

We used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and identified all adults who underwent primary SHK or HAT between January 2010 and March 2022. Recipients supported with a durable LVAD and estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 were selected (n = 309 SHK; 217 pre- and 92 post-HAP and n = 3,324 HAT; 2738 pre- and 586 post-HAP).

RESULTS

Difference in survival at 1 y did not reach statistical significance. Comparing the 1-y survival of SHK and HAT recipients who were bridged with LVAD pre-HAP, we found no significant difference ( P = 0.694). Adjusting for the same covariates in a multivariable model did not affect the results (SHK versus HAT hazard ratio 0.84 [0.51, 1.37]; P = 0.48). In contrast, SHK recipients supported with an LVAD who were listed and transplanted post-HAP change had significantly lower 1-y survival, when compared with HAT ( P = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the HAP change had a potentially negative impact on the survival of select patients undergoing SHK transplant. Further research is warranted in this area.

摘要

背景

心脏移植仍然是终末期心力衰竭合格患者的最有效治疗方法。在该人群中,同时存在肾脏疾病很常见,这促使近年来同时进行心脏-肾脏(SHK)移植的数量增加。我们研究的目的是探讨 2018 年心脏分配政策(HAP)变化对候选者列表特征的影响,并比较在移植前使用左心室辅助装置(LVAD)支持的患者中,接受 SHK 或单独心脏移植(HAT)的患者在 1 年时的生存率。

方法

我们使用了移植受者科学登记处的数据,并确定了 2010 年 1 月至 2022 年 3 月期间接受原发性 SHK 或 HAT 的所有成年人。选择了使用耐用性 LVAD 和估计肾小球滤过率<60mL/min/1.73m 2 的患者(n=309 例 SHK;217 例为 HAP 前,92 例为 HAP 后;n=3324 例 HAT;2738 例为 HAP 前,586 例为 HAP 后)。

结果

1 年时的生存率差异没有达到统计学意义。在比较 HAP 前使用 LVAD 桥接的 SHK 和 HAT 受者的 1 年生存率时,我们没有发现显著差异(P=0.694)。在多变量模型中调整相同的协变量也没有影响结果(SHK 与 HAT 的风险比为 0.84[0.51,1.37];P=0.48)。相比之下,与 HAT 相比,在 HAP 后被列入名单并接受移植的 SHK 受者,1 年生存率显著降低(P=0.037)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,HAP 变化可能对接受 SHK 移植的特定患者的生存产生负面影响。在这一领域需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Survival After Simultaneous Heart-kidney Transplant in Recipients With a Durable LVAD and Chronic Kidney Disease: Effect of the 2018 Heart Allocation Policy Change.慢性肾脏病合并持久左心室辅助装置患者心脏-肾脏联合移植术后的生存情况:2018 年心脏分配政策变化的影响。
Transplantation. 2024 Feb 1;108(2):524-529. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004781. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
2
Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Use and Clinical Outcomes of Simultaneous Heart/Kidney Transplant Recipients in the Pre- and Post-heart Allocation Policy Change Eras.心脏分配政策改变前后同期心脏/肾脏移植受者使用临时机械循环支持的情况及其临床结局。
Transplantation. 2023 Jul 1;107(7):1605-1614. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004518. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
The impact of the OPTN policy change on patients with a durable left ventricular assist device and chronic kidney disease: Analysis of the UNOS database.OPTN 政策变化对具有耐用性左心室辅助装置和慢性肾脏病患者的影响:UNOS 数据库分析。
Artif Organs. 2024 Oct;48(10):1180-1189. doi: 10.1111/aor.14770. Epub 2024 May 27.
4
Bridge with a left ventricular assist device to a simultaneous heart and kidney transplant: Review of the United Network for Organ Sharing database.左心室辅助装置桥接至同期心脏和肾脏移植:器官共享联合网络数据库综述
J Card Surg. 2017 Mar;32(3):209-214. doi: 10.1111/jocs.13105. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
5
Renal Outcomes in Patients Bridged to Heart Transplant With a Left Ventricular Assist Device.左心室辅助装置桥接心脏移植患者的肾脏结局。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Aug;110(2):567-574. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.11.021. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
Outcomes of heart transplant recipients bridged with percutaneous versus durable left ventricular assist devices.接受经皮与耐用型左心室辅助装置过渡的心脏移植受者的结局
Clin Transplant. 2023 Apr;37(4):e14904. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14904. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
7
Risk of Renal Dysfunction Following Heart Transplantation in Patients Bridged with a Left Ventricular Assist Device.左心室辅助装置桥接的心脏移植患者肾功能障碍的风险。
ASAIO J. 2022 May 1;68(5):646-653. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001558. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
8
Three-Year Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes and Strategy After Heart Transplant Allocation Score Change.心脏移植分配评分改变后三年左心室辅助装置的结果和策略。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Sep 1;226:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.07.001. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
9
Change in Renal Function and Its Impact on Survival in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Bridged to Heart Transplantation With a Left Ventricular Assist Device.慢性肾脏病患者应用左心室辅助装置桥接心脏移植后肾功能变化及其对生存的影响。
ASAIO J. 2021 Nov 1;67(11):1204-1210. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001384.
10
Renal Function in Patients with or without a Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant During Listing for a Heart Transplant.接受心脏移植名单中有无左心室辅助装置植入患者的肾功能。
Ann Transplant. 2020 Nov 10;25:e925653. doi: 10.12659/AOT.925653.

引用本文的文献

1
Advanced Heart Failure Secondary to Chagas Cardiomyopathy: A Case of Successful Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement.恰加斯心肌病继发晚期心力衰竭:一例成功植入左心室辅助装置的病例
Cureus. 2025 May 31;17(5):e85141. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85141. eCollection 2025 May.