Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 8;102(36):e35017. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035017.
The study aimed to investigate and compare the acute effects of 2 local vibration frequencies (63 Hz vs 42 Hz frequencies) applied to the biceps brachii muscles on the elbow joint position sense (JPS) in healthy young men.
A 3-arm parallel-group design with randomization of participants was used. Forty-five healthy young men aged 19 to 30 years were randomly assigned to 3 groups: to receive 63 Hz (n = 15) in experimental group 1 (EG1) or 42 Hz (n = 15) in experimental group 2 (EG2) or sham vibration in the control group (n = 15). Participants in the EG1 and EG2 received 5 bouts of 1-minute vibration exposure to the biceps brachii muscle, with a 1-minute rest between the bouts. In control group, sham vibration was applied with the same duration and interval as in EG1 and EG2. The active elbow joint position error was selected as an outcome measure to assess elbow JPS. The target angle and the angle reproduced were measured using a Universal Goniometer. The difference between the target and the reproduced angles was calculated to determine active elbow joint position error. Measurements were made before the vibration application and right after it.
No statistically significant difference was observed in the JPS of the elbow joint over time in any group (P = .625). No statistically significant differences were observed between the 33 groups in the JPS of the elbow (P = .075).
There was no acute effect of vibration of the biceps brachii muscle at 63 and 42 Hz on active elbow JPS in healthy adults.
本研究旨在调查和比较两种局部振动频率(63Hz 与 42Hz 频率)施加于肱二头肌对健康年轻男性肘关节位置觉(JPS)的急性影响。
采用 3 臂平行组设计,对参与者进行随机分组。45 名 19 至 30 岁的健康年轻男性被随机分为 3 组:实验组 1(EG1)接受 63Hz 振动(n=15),实验组 2(EG2)接受 42Hz 振动(n=15),对照组(n=15)接受假振动。EG1 和 EG2 组的参与者接受 5 次 1 分钟肱二头肌振动暴露,每次之间休息 1 分钟。在对照组中,以与 EG1 和 EG2 相同的持续时间和间隔进行假振动。主动肘关节位置误差被选为评估肘关节 JPS 的结果测量指标。使用通用测角器测量目标角度和再现角度。通过计算目标角度和再现角度之间的差异来确定主动肘关节位置误差。在振动应用之前和之后立即进行测量。
在任何组中,肘关节 JPS 在时间上均无统计学差异(P=0.625)。3 组之间的肘关节 JPS 也无统计学差异(P=0.075)。
63Hz 和 42Hz 肱二头肌振动对健康成年人主动肘关节 JPS 没有急性影响。