Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Department of Statistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2023 Dec;20(12):610-620. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2023.2257254. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
Both respirators and surgical masks (SM) are used as source control devices. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was much interest in understanding the extent of particle total outward leakage (TOL) from these devices. The objective of this study was to quantify the TOL for five categories of devices: SMs, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) without exhalation valves, NIOSH Approved N95 FFRs with exhalation valves (N95 FFRV), NIOSH Approved elastomeric half-mask respirators (EHMRs) with exhalation valves, and NIOSH Approved EHMRs with an SM covering the exhalation valve (EHMRSM). A benchtop test system was designed to test two models of each device category. Each device was mounted on a headform at three faceseal levels (0% faceseal, 50% faceseal, and 100% faceseal). At each faceseal level, the TOL was assessed at three flow rates of minute ventilations of 17, 28, and 39 L/min. The experimental design was a split-split-plot configuration. Device type, faceseal level, flow rate, and the interaction of device type and faceseal level were found to have a significant effect ( < 0.05) on the TOL. This study found that the N95 FFRs without exhalation valves had the lowest mean TOL. The SMs had about three times higher TOL than the N95 FFRs without exhalation valves. The TOL of the N95 FFRV was comparable to that of the SM at 0% and 50% faceseal on average overall conditions, but the N95 FFRV had a significantly higher TOL than the SM at a 100% faceseal. The EHMRs had the highest TOL because of the exhalation valve. Using an SM to cover the exhalation valve did not improve the EHMRs' efficiency in mitigating the TOL. Caution should be exercised when using N95 FFRVs as a source control measure against respiratory activities with heavy work rates, such as performing CPR. Results of this study showed that reduced faceseal leakage for N95 FFRs and SMs improves source control.
呼吸器和外科口罩(SM)都可用作源控制设备。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,人们非常关注理解这些设备的总颗粒向外泄漏(TOL)程度。本研究的目的是量化五类设备的 TOL:SM、美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)批准的无呼气阀 N95 过滤式面罩呼吸器(FFR)、NIOSH 批准的带呼气阀 N95 FFR(N95 FFRV)、NIOSH 批准的带呼气阀弹性半面罩呼吸器(EHMR)和带呼气阀 SM 覆盖的 NIOSH 批准的 EHMR(EHMRSM)。设计了一个台式测试系统来测试每个设备类别的两个型号。将每个设备安装在头模上,在三个面部密封水平(0%面部密封、50%面部密封和 100%面部密封)下进行测试。在每个面部密封水平下,在每分钟通气 17、28 和 39 L 的三个流量下评估 TOL。实验设计为分裂-分裂-区组配置。设备类型、面部密封水平、流量以及设备类型和面部密封水平的相互作用对 TOL 有显著影响(<0.05)。本研究发现,无呼气阀的 N95 FFR 具有最低的平均 TOL。SM 的 TOL 比无呼气阀的 N95 FFR 高约三倍。在所有条件下,N95 FFRV 的 TOL 平均与 SM 相当,但在 100%面部密封时,N95 FFRV 的 TOL 明显高于 SM。EHMR 由于呼气阀而具有最高的 TOL。使用 SM 覆盖呼气阀并不能提高 EHMR 减轻 TOL 的效率。在进行高工作速率的呼吸活动(如进行心肺复苏术)时,应谨慎使用 N95 FFRV 作为源控制措施。本研究结果表明,减少 N95 FFR 和 SM 的面部密封泄漏可提高源控制效果。