Mingels Sarah, Granitzer Marita, Schmid Annina B, Dankaerts Wim
Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium; REVAL Rehabilitation Research Centre, Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
REVAL Rehabilitation Research Centre, Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2023 Oct;67:102855. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102855. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
One in four individuals with cervicogenic headache (CeH) are unresponsive to therapy. Such therapy involves predominantly biomedical interventions targeting the upper-cervical spine. A recurring theme within musculoskeletal practice is the multidimensional nature and substantial heterogeneity of the condition. Such heterogeneity might be a reason for failure of a biomedical approach. Therefore, future studies investigating efficacy of managing CeH should ideally be based on identification, and better understanding of the heterogeneity of this population based on a comprehensive evaluation of clinically relevant contributing factors.
The objective was to map profiles of individuals with CeH based on pain modulation within a multidimensional context.
Pain Modulation Profiles (PMPs) of 18 adults (29-51 years) with CeH were mapped retrospectively.
The PMPs consisted of a Pain-Profile (bilateral suboccipital, erector spinae, anterior tibialis pressure pain thresholds), a Psycho-Social-Lifestyle-Profile (Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale, Headache Impact test, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), or a combination of both. Individual results were compared to normative data. Two Pain-Profiles were defined: normal or altered. Psycho-Social-Lifestyle-Profiles were categorized based on the number of altered psycho-social-lifestyle factors (range 0-5).
Mapping PMPs in individuals with CeH resulted in 50% presenting with a dominant altered Pain-Profile, 16.7% with a dominant altered Psycho-Social-Lifestyle-Profile, and 5.6% with dominant alterations in both Pain-Profile and Psycho-Social-Lifestyle-Profile.
Our results indicate heterogeneity of PMPs within the CeH population. Replication of these results is needed through dynamic assessment of the Pain-Profile before evaluating if these profiles can help patient-stratification.
四分之一的颈源性头痛(CeH)患者对治疗无反应。此类治疗主要涉及针对上颈椎的生物医学干预。肌肉骨骼疾病治疗中的一个反复出现的问题是该疾病的多维度性质和显著异质性。这种异质性可能是生物医学方法失败的原因。因此,未来研究颈源性头痛管理疗效的理想方式应基于对这一人群异质性的识别,并通过对临床相关影响因素的全面评估来更好地理解这种异质性。
目的是在多维度背景下根据疼痛调节绘制颈源性头痛患者的特征图谱。
对18名年龄在29 - 51岁的颈源性头痛成年患者的疼痛调节特征图谱(PMPs)进行回顾性绘制。
疼痛调节特征图谱包括疼痛特征图谱(双侧枕下、竖脊肌、胫骨前肌压力疼痛阈值)、心理 - 社会 - 生活方式特征图谱(抑郁、焦虑、压力量表、头痛影响测试、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数)或两者的组合。将个体结果与标准数据进行比较。定义了两种疼痛特征图谱:正常或异常。心理 - 社会 - 生活方式特征图谱根据心理 - 社会 - 生活方式改变因素的数量进行分类(范围为0 - 5)。
绘制颈源性头痛患者的疼痛调节特征图谱发现,50%的患者主要表现为疼痛特征图谱异常,16.7%的患者主要表现为心理 - 社会 - 生活方式特征图谱异常,5.6%的患者疼痛特征图谱和心理 - 社会 - 生活方式特征图谱均主要异常。
我们的结果表明颈源性头痛人群中疼痛调节特征图谱存在异质性。在评估这些特征图谱是否有助于患者分层之前,需要通过对疼痛特征图谱的动态评估来重复这些结果。