• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自发的视觉视角转换与持续的注意线索:一种改进的点视角任务范式。

Spontaneous visual perspective-taking with constant attention cue: A modified dot-perspective task paradigm.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China.

Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, 300074, China.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 May;86(4):1176-1185. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02772-8. Epub 2023 Sep 8.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-023-02772-8
PMID:37684500
Abstract

It has been argued that humans can employ mentalizing implicitly and automatically, even with others' visual experiences. In terms of visual perspective-taking (i.e., inferring another's visual experience), the Dot Perspective Task has been considered to provide evidence for this hypothesis. People were found to respond slower when their visual experience was inconsistent with others' (referred to as the consistency effect). However, the specific underlying cognitive process of the consistency effect has been a topic of intense debate, i.e., whether the consistency effect represents a process of social cognition such as mentalizing. Here, we introduce a modified version of the Dot Perspective Task, in which all the targets appear at the position where the avatar is gazing, while some of the targets are invisible to the avatar due to a barrier that may block the avatar's line of sight. Therefore, the effect of perspective-taking and attention-cueing can be better disassociated in the modified paradigm. The results of Experiment 1 illustrated a significant consistency effect, which was further confirmed in Experiment 2. More importantly, the consistency effect was absent in Experiment 3, where the avatar sat with his back to the participants. These findings imply that the consistency effect reflects the automatic computation of others' visual information, and rule out the attention-cueing account of the consistency effect.

摘要

有人认为,即使是在他人的视觉体验中,人类也可以隐含地和自动地进行心理理论推断。就视觉观点采择(即推断他人的视觉体验)而言,点视角任务被认为提供了支持这一假设的证据。当人们的视觉体验与他人不一致时(称为一致性效应),他们的反应会变慢。然而,一致性效应的具体潜在认知过程一直是激烈争论的话题,即一致性效应是否代表心理理论等社会认知过程。在这里,我们引入了点视角任务的一个修改版本,其中所有的目标都出现在头像注视的位置,而由于可能阻挡头像视线的障碍物,一些目标对头像不可见。因此,在修改后的范式中,可以更好地将视角采择和注意提示的效果分离。实验 1 的结果表明存在显著的一致性效应,实验 2 进一步证实了这一结果。更重要的是,当头像背对着参与者时,实验 3 中不存在一致性效应。这些发现表明,一致性效应反映了对他人视觉信息的自动计算,排除了一致性效应的注意提示解释。

相似文献

1
Spontaneous visual perspective-taking with constant attention cue: A modified dot-perspective task paradigm.自发的视觉视角转换与持续的注意线索:一种改进的点视角任务范式。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 May;86(4):1176-1185. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02772-8. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
2
Avatars and arrows: implicit mentalizing or domain-general processing?阿凡达与箭头:内隐心理化还是一般领域加工?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun;40(3):929-937. doi: 10.1037/a0035175. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
3
The self-consistency effect seen on the Dot Perspective Task is a product of domain-general attention cueing, not automatic perspective taking.点探测任务中观察到的自我一致性效应是源于一般领域的注意提示,而不是自动的视角转换。
Cognition. 2022 Jul;224:105056. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105056. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
4
Age of avatar modulates the altercentric bias in a visual perspective-taking task: ERP and behavioral evidence.头像年龄调节视觉观点采择任务中的利己偏向:ERP 和行为证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Dec;18(6):1298-1319. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0641-1.
5
Manipulating avatar age and gender in level-2 visual perspective taking.在二级视觉观点采集中操纵化身的年龄和性别。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Aug;30(4):1431-1441. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02249-7.
6
Do humans spontaneously take the perspective of others?人类会自发地采取他人的视角吗?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Feb;164:165-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
7
Clarifying the role of theory of mind areas during visual perspective taking: Issues of spontaneity and domain-specificity.厘清心理理论区域在视觉观点采择中的作用:自发性和领域特殊性问题。
Neuroimage. 2015 Aug 15;117:386-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.031. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
8
Eye tracking reveals the cost of switching between self and other perspectives in a visual perspective-taking task.眼动追踪揭示了在视觉视角采择任务中自我与他人视角切换的代价。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Aug;70(8):1646-1660. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1199716. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
9
Does altercentric interference rely on mentalizing?: Results from two level-1 perspective-taking tasks.是否存在以他人为中心的干扰取决于心理化能力?来自两个一级观点采择任务的结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 22;13(3):e0194101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194101. eCollection 2018.
10
Seeing it both ways: Using a double-cuing task to investigate the role of spatial cuing in Level-1 visual perspective-taking.两种视角看待:运用双重线索任务探究空间线索在一级视觉视角采择中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 May;44(5):693-702. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000486. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Objects that direct visuospatial attention produce the search advantage for facing dyads.目标物引导视空间注意会产生面对双元组的搜索优势。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jan;151(1):161-171. doi: 10.1037/xge0001067. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
2
Perspective taking as virtual navigation? Perceptual simulation of what others see reflects their location in space but not their gaze.视角-taking 作为虚拟导航?对他人所见的知觉模拟反映了他们在空间中的位置,但不反映他们的注视方向。
Cognition. 2020 Jun;199:104241. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104241. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
3
Time pressure disrupts level-2, but not level-1, visual perspective calculation: A process-dissociation analysis.
时间压力会干扰二级,但不会干扰一级,视觉透视计算:一个过程分离分析。
Cognition. 2019 Aug;189:41-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
4
Let's share our perspectives, but only if our body postures match.让我们分享彼此的观点,但前提是我们的身体姿势要相符。
Cortex. 2019 Oct;119:575-579. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.02.019. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
5
Does altercentric interference rely on mentalizing?: Results from two level-1 perspective-taking tasks.是否存在以他人为中心的干扰取决于心理化能力?来自两个一级观点采择任务的结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 22;13(3):e0194101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194101. eCollection 2018.
6
Attentional interference is modulated by salience not sentience.注意干扰是由显著性而非感受性调节的。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Jul;178:56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
7
Gender differences in cognitive Theory of Mind revealed by transcranial direct current stimulation on medial prefrontal cortex.经颅直流电刺激内侧前额叶皮质揭示认知心理理论的性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 24;7:41219. doi: 10.1038/srep41219.
8
Submentalizing or mentalizing in a Level 1 perspective-taking task: A cloak and goggles test.在一级观点采择任务中进行颏下心理化或心理化:一项斗篷与护目镜测试。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Mar;43(3):454-465. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000319. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
9
Do humans spontaneously take the perspective of others?人类会自发地采取他人的视角吗?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Feb;164:165-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
10
The extent of default visual perspective taking in complex layouts.在复杂布局中默认视觉视角采择的程度。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Apr;42(4):508-16. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000164. Epub 2015 Nov 9.