Hassan F, Abdel-Wahab M F, Nosseur A, Sedeek S, Shehata A, Masood M A
J Trop Med Hyg. 1979 Jan;82(1):3-7.
Eighty-six bilharzial patients divided into 5 clinical groups were studied. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) and indirect haemagglutination (IHA) test were performed for all the patients. ELISA gave the most sensitive results (82.6% and 80.2% positivity rate in Egypt and Lille respectively), followed by IFA (79.1% positivity rate) and IHA (77.9% and 75.6% positivity rate in Egypt and Lille respectively). The humoral antibodies detected by all methods (ELISA, IFA and IHA) showed increasing values with the progress of the disease which is parallel to the antigenicity of the disease. Both the positivity rate and the mean value of antibody titres recorded by the 3 diagnostic techniques (ELISA, IFA and IHA) were significantly higher in mansoni than haematobium infection. This may be explained by species specificity of antibody response. The superiority of ELISA over IFA and IHA techniques was discussed.
对86例血吸虫病患者进行了研究,这些患者被分为5个临床组。对所有患者进行了酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、间接荧光抗体(IFA)和间接血凝试验(IHA)。ELISA的结果最为敏感(在埃及和里尔的阳性率分别为82.6%和80.2%),其次是IFA(阳性率为79.1%)和IHA(在埃及和里尔的阳性率分别为77.9%和75.6%)。所有方法(ELISA、IFA和IHA)检测到的体液抗体随着疾病进展而升高,这与疾病的抗原性平行。在曼氏血吸虫感染中,三种诊断技术(ELISA、IFA和IHA)记录的阳性率和抗体滴度平均值均显著高于埃及血吸虫感染。这可能是由于抗体反应的种属特异性。文中讨论了ELISA相对于IFA和IHA技术的优越性。