• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国六个州老年人的极端风险保护令:一项描述性研究。

Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Older Adults in Six U.S. States: A Descriptive Study.

作者信息

Betz Marian E, Frattaroli Shannon, Knoepke Christopher E, Johnson Rachel, Christy Annette, Schleimer Julia P, Pear Veronica A, McCarthy Megan, Kapoor Reena, Norko Michael A, Rowhani-Rahbar Ali, Ma Wenjuan, Wintemute Garen J, Swanson Jeffrey W, Zeoli April M

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Firearm Injury Prevention Initiative, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Clin Gerontol. 2024 Jul-Sep;47(4):536-543. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2023.2254279. Epub 2023 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1080/07317115.2023.2254279
PMID:37688772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11229607/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) allow a court to restrict firearm access for individuals ("respondents") at imminent risk of harm to self/others. Little is known about ERPOs use for older adults, a population with higher rates of suicide and dementia.

METHODS

We abstracted ERPO cases through June 30, 2020, from California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, and Washington. We restricted our analysis to petitions for older (≥65 years) respondents, stratified by documented cognitive impairment.

RESULTS

Among 6,699 ERPO petitions, 672 (10.0%) were for older adults; 13.7% ( = 92) of these noted cognitive impairment. Most were white (75.7%) men (90.2%). Cognitively impaired (vs. non-impaired) respondents were older (mean age 78.2 vs 72.7 years) and more likely to have documented irrational/erratic behavior (30.4% vs 15.7%), but less likely to have documented suicidality (33.7% vs 55.0%). At the time of the petition, 56.2% of older adult respondents had documented firearm access (median accessible firearms = 3, range 1-160).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 14% of ERPO petitions for older adults involved cognitive impairment; one-third of these noted suicide risk. Studies examining ERPO implementation across states may inform usage and awareness.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

ERPOs may reduce firearm access among older adults with cognitive impairment, suicidality, or risk of violence.

摘要

目的

极端风险保护令(ERPOs)允许法院限制对自身/他人面临紧迫伤害风险的个人(“被申请人”)获取枪支。对于老年人群体(自杀和痴呆发生率较高)使用极端风险保护令的情况,我们知之甚少。

方法

我们从加利福尼亚州、科罗拉多州、康涅狄格州、佛罗里达州、马里兰州和华盛顿州提取了截至2020年6月30日的极端风险保护令案件。我们将分析限制在针对老年(≥65岁)被申请人的申请上,并按记录的认知障碍进行分层。

结果

在6699份极端风险保护令申请中,672份(10.0%)是针对老年人的;其中13.7%(n = 92)提到了认知障碍。大多数是白人(75.7%)男性(90.2%)。有认知障碍(与无认知障碍相比)的被申请人年龄更大(平均年龄78.2岁对72.7岁),更有可能有记录的非理性/古怪行为(30.4%对15.7%),但记录有自杀倾向的可能性较小(33.7%对55.0%)。在申请时,56.2%的老年被申请人有记录的枪支获取情况(可获取枪支的中位数 = 3,范围1 - 160)。

结论

约14%的针对老年人的极端风险保护令申请涉及认知障碍;其中三分之一提到了自杀风险。对各州极端风险保护令实施情况的研究可能会为其使用和认知提供信息。

临床意义

极端风险保护令可能会减少有认知障碍、自杀倾向或暴力风险的老年人获取枪支的情况。

相似文献

1
Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Older Adults in Six U.S. States: A Descriptive Study.美国六个州老年人的极端风险保护令:一项描述性研究。
Clin Gerontol. 2024 Jul-Sep;47(4):536-543. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2023.2254279. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
2
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
3
Arrests Among Extreme Risk Protection Order Respondents in Washington State: A Statewide Retrospective Cohort Study.华盛顿州极端风险保护令受访者中的逮捕情况:一项全州范围的回顾性队列研究。
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251349717. doi: 10.1177/00469580251349717. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Extreme risk protection order use in six US states: a descriptive study.美国六个州的极端风险保护令使用情况:一项描述性研究。
Inj Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 3;12(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40621-025-00585-x.
6
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
7
Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people.初级保健医生对有症状人群进行全因痴呆或认知障碍诊断的临床判断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):CD012558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012558.pub2.
8
Implementation of Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Colorado from 2020 to 2022: Firearm relinquishment and return and petitioner characteristics.2020年至2022年科罗拉多州极端风险保护令的实施情况:枪支上缴与归还以及申请人特征
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jun 20;44:102800. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102800. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
Antihypertensive withdrawal for the prevention of cognitive decline.停用抗高血压药物以预防认知功能减退。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):CD011971. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011971.pub2.
10
CSF tau and the CSF tau/ABeta ratio for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).脑脊液tau蛋白及脑脊液tau蛋白与β淀粉样蛋白比值在轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者中用于诊断阿尔茨海默病性痴呆及其他痴呆。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 22;3(3):CD010803. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010803.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Professional Training and Public Education Can Support Extreme Risk Protection Order Utilization: A Qualitative Study of Professionals in Oregon.专业培训与公众教育有助于极端风险保护令的实施:一项对俄勒冈州专业人员的定性研究
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251371379. doi: 10.1177/00469580251371379. Epub 2025 Sep 1.
2
Extreme risk protection order use in six US states: a descriptive study.美国六个州的极端风险保护令使用情况:一项描述性研究。
Inj Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 3;12(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40621-025-00585-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Older adults and planning for firearm safety: A qualitative study of healthcare providers.老年人与枪支安全规划:医疗保健提供者的定性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Apr;71(4):1275-1282. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18188. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
2
Cars, Guns, Aging, and "Giving Up the Keys".汽车、枪支、老龄化和“放弃钥匙”。
Gerontologist. 2023 May 9;63(4):717-730. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac142.
3
Extreme risk protection orders in response to threats of multiple victim/mass shooting in six U.S. states: A descriptive study.针对美国六个州的多受害者/大规模枪击威胁采取的极端风险保护令:一项描述性研究。
Prev Med. 2022 Dec;165(Pt A):107304. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107304. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
4
Risk of Suicide After Dementia Diagnosis.痴呆症诊断后的自杀风险。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Oct 3;79(11):1148-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.3094.
5
Public Awareness of and Personal Willingness to Use California's Extreme Risk Protection Order Law to Prevent Firearm-Related Harm.公众对加州极端风险保护令法律的认知度和个人使用意愿,以预防与枪支相关的伤害。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jun 4;2(6):e210975. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0975. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Perspectives on clinician-delivered firearm safety counseling during routine care: Results of a national survey.临床医生在常规护理中提供枪支安全咨询的观点:一项全国性调查的结果。
Prev Med. 2022 May;158:107039. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107039. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
7
Firearm ownership, attitudes, and safe storage practices among a nationally representative sample of older U.S. adults age 50 to 80.50 岁至 80 岁的美国成年人中具有代表性的全国性样本的枪支拥有情况、态度和安全储存做法。
Prev Med. 2022 Mar;156:106955. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.106955. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
8
Colorado's first year of extreme risk protection orders.科罗拉多州实施极端风险保护令的第一年。
Inj Epidemiol. 2021 Oct 20;8(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40621-021-00353-7.
9
Implementation and perceived effectiveness of gun violence restraining orders in California: A qualitative evaluation.加利福尼亚州枪支暴力限制令的实施情况和感知效果:定性评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 19;16(10):e0258547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258547. eCollection 2021.
10
Firearm access and dementia: A qualitative study of reported behavioral disturbances and responses.枪支获取与痴呆:对报告的行为障碍及应对方式的定性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Feb;70(2):439-448. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17496. Epub 2021 Sep 29.