• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低剂量利尿剂治疗高血压。

Low-dose diuretic therapy for hypertension.

作者信息

Moser M

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1986;8(5):554-62.

PMID:3768929
Abstract

The efficacy of low dosages of diuretics was evaluated in two studies. In one, 62 (48%) of 130 patients became normotensive with 2.5 mg/day of metolazone. In the other, 28 (49%) of 57 patients became normotensive with 25 mg of chlorthalidone, compared with 12 (22%) of 55 patients given placebo. There was a marked variation in blood pressure response and the occurrence of hypokalemia (less than 3.5 mEq/L of potassium) from center to center and within patient groups in both studies. The mean decrease in serum potassium was between 0.5 and 0.6 mEq/L in the metolazone group and 0.44 mEq/L in the chlorthalidone-treated patients. This degree of hypokalemia is only slightly less than that noted when larger dosages of thiazide diuretics are used (0.6 to 0.7 mEq/L). It is concluded that 2.5 mg/day of metolazone or 25 mg/day of chlorthalidone are effective antihypertensive agents but that blood pressure lowering may be inconsistent at these dosage levels. It is reasonable, therefore, to begin diuretic therapy with low dosages, but larger dosages (5 mg of metolazone or 50 mg of chlorthalidone) should be tried before adding another drug or concluding that diuretic therapy is ineffective if an acceptable blood pressure response is not obtained. The degree of hypokalemia that occurs at lower-dose therapy is variable but may be of less clinical significance than that noted with higher dosages of diuretics in some patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

两项研究评估了低剂量利尿剂的疗效。在一项研究中,130名患者中有62名(48%)服用2.5毫克/天的美托拉宗后血压恢复正常。在另一项研究中,57名患者中有28名(49%)服用25毫克氯噻酮后血压恢复正常,而服用安慰剂的55名患者中有12名(22%)血压恢复正常。在这两项研究中,中心之间以及患者组内的血压反应和低钾血症(血钾低于3.5毫当量/升)的发生情况存在显著差异。美托拉宗组血清钾平均下降0.5至0.6毫当量/升,氯噻酮治疗的患者血清钾平均下降0.44毫当量/升。这种低钾血症程度仅略低于使用较大剂量噻嗪类利尿剂时的情况(0.6至0.7毫当量/升)。结论是,2.5毫克/天的美托拉宗或25毫克/天的氯噻酮是有效的抗高血压药物,但在这些剂量水平下血压降低可能不一致。因此,合理的做法是以低剂量开始利尿剂治疗,但在添加其他药物或得出利尿剂治疗无效的结论(如果未获得可接受的血压反应)之前,应尝试更大剂量(5毫克美托拉宗或50毫克氯噻酮)。低剂量治疗时发生的低钾血症程度各不相同,但在某些患者中,其临床意义可能比高剂量利尿剂时小。(摘要截取自250字)

相似文献

1
Low-dose diuretic therapy for hypertension.低剂量利尿剂治疗高血压。
Clin Ther. 1986;8(5):554-62.
2
Clinical studies of a new, low-dose formulation of metolazone for the treatment of hypertension.
Clin Ther. 1986;9(1):47-62.
3
Captopril and oxprenolol in a fixed combination with thiazide diuretics: comparison of their antihypertensive efficacy and metabolic effects.卡托普利和氧烯洛尔与噻嗪类利尿剂的固定复方制剂:降压疗效和代谢效应的比较
Clin Ther. 1984;6(5):708-18.
4
Hydrochlorothiazide versus chlorthalidone in the management of hypertension.氢氯噻嗪与氯噻酮治疗高血压的比较。
Cardiol Rev. 2010 Jan-Feb;18(1):51-6. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e3181c61b52.
5
Comparison of chlorthalidone, propranolol and bopindolol in six-month treatment of arterial hypertension.氯噻酮、普萘洛尔和波吲洛尔治疗动脉高血压六个月的比较。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1998;18(2):73-8.
6
Long-acting and short-acting diuretics in the treatment of hypertension.
Pharmatherapeutica. 1983;3(7):475-81.
7
Influence of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan on diuretic-induced metabolic effects in elderly hypertensive patients: comparison with a calcium channel blocker.血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂氯沙坦对老年高血压患者利尿剂诱发代谢效应的影响:与钙通道阻滞剂的比较
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Oct;39(10):417-22.
8
[Diuretics and antihypertensive agents in chronic kidney insufficiency: comparison of the effects of metolazone and furosemide].
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1985 Jan 12;115(2):41-5.
9
Influence of the administration time on the antihypertensive and hypokalaemic effects of chlorthalidone in patients with primary hypertension.给药时间对原发性高血压患者中氯噻酮的降压及低钾血症作用的影响。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1985;5(2):109-12.
10
Renal outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or a calcium channel blocker vs a diuretic: a report from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或钙通道阻滞剂与利尿剂治疗高危高血压患者的肾脏转归:抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验(ALLHAT)报告
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Apr 25;165(8):936-46. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.8.936.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension.噻嗪类利尿剂单药治疗原发性高血压的降压疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 29;2014(5):CD003824. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003824.pub2.