Lee Yunsoo, Issa Tariq Z, Lambrechts Mark J, Carey Preston, Becsey Alexander, Qadiri Qudratullah S, Khanna Akshay, Canseco Jose A, Schroeder Gregory D, Kepler Christopher K, Hilibrand Alan S, Vaccaro Alexander R
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut St, 5th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut St, 5th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Spine J. 2023 Sep 9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.08.024.
To examine ten-year trends in gender representation in speaking roles at major spine conferences.
Medical conferences play an important role in career opportunities. There is little analysis on gender representation of major spine conferences despite several studies demonstrating gender disparities within spine surgery.
Observational study.
A total of 20,181 abstract speakers across 10 years of academic conferences for six spine societies.
Percent of female abstract presenters.
We collated the annual meeting programs of six major spine conferences (North American Spine Society (NASS), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS), International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques (IMAST), Global Spine Congress (GSC), American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons (AANS/CNS) Spine Summit, and the Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS)) dating from 2013 to 2022. Departmental websites, society webpages, or personal social media were identified for images or the use of gendered pronouns in order to determine speaker gender for each speaker type. All categorical variables were compared using Pearson chi-square analysis.
Women constituted 1,816 (9.0%) of all 20,181 identified conference speakers. Female representation was highest at NASS (N=680, 12.2%) but lowest at CSRS (6.6%) and GSC (7.1%). Spine Summit (7.4%), IMAST (9.92%), and GSC (9.87%) demonstrated the largest annual percent increases in female representation. Institutions in Middle East and Africa (1.4%), and Central and South America (1.8%) supported the lowest percent of female speakers. Women were significantly less likely to be speakers or moderators/course faculty than to be podium abstract presenters (p<.001). The percent of women as invited speakers (10.4% vs. 5.5%, p=.001) and moderators (11.4% vs. 3.7%, p<.001) increased significantly over the study period, with annual increases of 8.8% and 20.8%, respectively, from 2013 to 2022 (p<.001).
While academic spine societies have made significant progress in promoting gender representation, especially among invited speakers and session moderators, women continue to be underrepresented compared to the percent of women in orthopedic surgery and neurosurgery.
研究主要脊柱会议中发言角色的性别代表性十年趋势。
医学会议在职业发展机会中发挥着重要作用。尽管有多项研究表明脊柱外科存在性别差异,但对主要脊柱会议的性别代表性分析较少。
观察性研究。
六个脊柱学会十年学术会议中总共20181名摘要发言人。
女性摘要发言人的比例。
我们整理了六个主要脊柱会议(北美脊柱学会(NASS)、脊柱侧弯研究学会(SRS)、先进脊柱技术国际会议(IMAST)、全球脊柱大会(GSC)、美国神经外科医师协会/神经外科医师大会(AANS/CNS)脊柱峰会以及颈椎研究学会(CSRS))从2013年到2022年的年会日程。通过部门网站、学会网页或个人社交媒体来确定图像或使用的性别代词,以确定每种发言人类型的性别。所有分类变量均使用Pearson卡方分析进行比较。
在所有20181名已确定的会议发言人中,女性有1816名(9.0%)。女性代表性在NASS最高(N = 680,12.2%),但在CSRS最低(6.6%),在GSC为(7.1%)。脊柱峰会(7.4%)、IMAST(9.92%)和GSC(9.87%)女性代表性的年度增幅最大。中东和非洲地区(1.4%)以及中南美洲地区(1.8%)的机构所支持的女性发言人比例最低。与在讲台进行摘要展示的女性相比,女性作为发言人或主持人/课程教员的可能性显著更低(p <.001)。在研究期间,女性作为受邀发言人(10.4%对5.5%,p = 0.001)和主持人(11.4%对3.7%,p <.001)的比例显著增加,从2013年到2022年,年增幅分别为8.8%和20.8%(p <.001)。
虽然学术脊柱学会在促进性别代表性方面取得了显著进展,特别是在受邀发言人和会议主持人中,但与骨科手术和神经外科中的女性比例相比,女性的代表性仍然不足。