Cai Juan, Backer Free De, Vandermeersche Geert, Lombaerts Koen
Department of Educational Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 24;14:1213397. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1213397. eCollection 2023.
A comprehensive cross-national understanding of the classroom learning environment (CLE) is critical to advancing CLE's development. This study compares the English and Chinese CLE literature to enhance a complete understanding of CLE. We conducted bibliometric analysis on 3,130 English literature from Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) and 1,261 Chinese literature from the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (CSSCI). The results show that both Chinese and English literature focus on the influence of CLE on students' cognitive and affective learning outcomes and the incorporation of information technology in CLE. The results also reveal the differences between Chinese and English literature from two perspectives: (1) Chinese CLE research mainly focuses on English education, and English CLE research mainly focuses on science education and (2) Chinese CLE research mainly analyzed the pedagogical aspect of CLE, while English CLE research focused on CLE's social and psychological aspects. We also discussed that future research should focus on (1) the balance of analyzing CLE from the perspective of students and other educational stakeholders such as teachers and school leaders, (2) student differences from the pedagogical level, (3) the physical level of CLE, (4) the use of statistical methods such as structural equation modeling that can analyze the mechanisms underlying the effects of CLE on student learning, and (5) the interdisciplinary research on CLE.
对课堂学习环境(CLE)进行全面的跨国理解对于推动CLE的发展至关重要。本研究比较了英文和中文的CLE文献,以增进对CLE的全面理解。我们对来自社会科学引文索引(SSCI)的3130篇英文文献和来自中国社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)的1261篇中文文献进行了文献计量分析。结果表明,中文和英文文献都关注CLE对学生认知和情感学习成果的影响以及信息技术在CLE中的应用。结果还从两个角度揭示了中文和英文文献的差异:(1)中国的CLE研究主要集中在英语教育,而英文的CLE研究主要集中在科学教育;(2)中国的CLE研究主要分析了CLE的教学方面,而英文的CLE研究则侧重于CLE的社会和心理方面。我们还讨论了未来的研究应关注:(1)从学生以及教师和学校领导等其他教育利益相关者的角度分析CLE的平衡;(2)教学层面的学生差异;(3)CLE的物质层面;(4)使用结构方程模型等统计方法来分析CLE对学生学习影响的潜在机制;(5)CLE的跨学科研究。