Zhu Qiuyan, Ni Ronghua, Guan Xin
Department of Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2023 Aug 30;12(8):1782-1789. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-456. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
The health expenditure on treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is enormous, especially in third-line or further therapy. Cost-effectiveness analysis for the treatment of advanced NSCLC is particularly important. Anlotinib has been approved by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) for the third-line or further treatment of advanced NSCLC. The price of anlotinib in China fell in 2022. Thus, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of anlotinib in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC based on the newest price from the Chinese health-care system perspective.
A Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime costs and effectiveness of anlotinib and a placebo in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC based on outcome data from the ALTER 0303 phase-3 randomized clinical trial, which included 437 patients with advanced NSCLC and investigated the efficacy of anlotinib. The lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the model uncertainty.
Anlotinib provided an additional 0.1161 QALYs compared to the placebo. The corresponding incremental cost was ¥22,729. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of anlotinib compared to the placebo was ¥195,768 per QALY. From the perspective of the Chinese health-care system, anlotinib was found to be cost-effective compared to the placebo in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of ¥242,928 per QALY. Moreover, 1-way sensitivity analysis found that the results were sensitive to the utility of progressive disease (PD). The lower this parameter was, the higher the probability of ICER for anlotinib not being cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed that the base-case analysis results were relatively stable.
Considering the clinical efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of anlotinib, it may be a valuable third-line or further treatment for advanced NSCLC in China.
晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗费用巨大,尤其是在三线及后续治疗中。晚期NSCLC治疗的成本效益分析尤为重要。安罗替尼已获中国国家药品监督管理局(CFDA)批准用于晚期NSCLC的三线及后续治疗。2022年安罗替尼在中国降价。因此,本研究从中国医疗保健系统的角度,基于最新价格评估了安罗替尼用于晚期NSCLC患者三线及后续治疗的成本效益。
基于ALTER 0303三期随机临床试验的结果数据,建立马尔可夫模型,比较安罗替尼与安慰剂在晚期NSCLC患者三线及后续治疗中的终身成本和有效性,该试验纳入了437例晚期NSCLC患者并研究了安罗替尼的疗效。估计了终身成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)。进行单向和概率敏感性分析以评估模型的不确定性。
与安慰剂相比,安罗替尼增加了0.1161个QALY。相应的增量成本为22,729元。安罗替尼与安慰剂相比的增量成本效益比(ICER)为每QALY 195,768元。从中国医疗保健系统的角度来看,在每QALY支付意愿(WTP)阈值为242,928元的情况下,安罗替尼用于晚期NSCLC患者三线及后续治疗与安慰剂相比具有成本效益。此外,单向敏感性分析发现结果对疾病进展(PD)的效用敏感。该参数越低,安罗替尼ICER不具有成本效益的概率越高。成本效益可接受性曲线表明,基础病例分析结果相对稳定。
考虑到安罗替尼的临床疗效、安全性和成本效益,它可能是中国晚期NSCLC有价值的三线及后续治疗药物。