Zhu Junjie, Tian Lei
Department of Pharmacoeconomics, School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Center for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 1;11:1363484. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1363484. eCollection 2024.
This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two Chinese patent medicines, including Kang Ai injection and Shenqi Fuzheng injection with each combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China.
From Chinese healthcare system perspective, a three state Markov model with a cycle of 3 weeks and a 10-year horizon was constructed to derive the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Since only individual patient data of progression-free survival (PFS) of Kang Ai injection group can be obtained, we extrapolated median overall survival (mOS) of Kang Ai injection group and median progression-free survival (mPFS) and mOS of Shenqi Fuzheng injection group based on published literature and methods. Then survival curves were estimated by the method of declining exponential approximation of life expectancy (DEALE), which is based on the assumption that survival follows a declining exponential function. We performed one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis to test the robustness. Additionally, a scenario analysis was adopted to investigate the impact of using best-fitting distribution for PFS curve of Kang Ai injection group on the economic conclusion.
The base-case result indicated that Kang Ai injection group provided 0.217 incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at an incremental cost of $103.38 compared with Shenqi Fuzheng injection group. The ICER was $476.41/QALY, which was much lower than the willingness to pay threshold of one time the GDP per capita of China in 2022 ($12,070/QALY). Deterministic sensitivity analysis result showed that ICER was most sensitive to the changes in odds ratio (OR) value. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of base-case analysis results. The scenario analysis result showed that by using Log-Normal distribution to fit the PFS curve of Kang Ai injection group and shortening the time horizon to 5 years, the ICER was $4,081.83/QALY, which was still much lower than the willingness to pay threshold.
Kang Ai injection combined with platinum-based chemotherapy appeared to be more cost-effective for the treatment of advanced NSCLC than Shenqi Fuzheng injection combined with platinum-based chemotherapy.
本研究旨在评估两种中成药(康艾注射液和参芪扶正注射液)分别联合铂类化疗作为中国晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者一线治疗方案的成本效益。
从中国医疗保健系统的角度出发,构建了一个三状态马尔可夫模型,周期为3周,时间跨度为10年,以得出增量成本效益比(ICER)。由于只能获得康艾注射液组无进展生存期(PFS)的个体患者数据,我们根据已发表的文献和方法推断了康艾注射液组的中位总生存期(mOS)以及参芪扶正注射液组的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)和mOS。然后,基于生存遵循指数递减函数的假设,采用预期寿命指数递减近似法(DEALE)估计生存曲线。我们进行了单向敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析以检验稳健性。此外,采用情景分析来研究使用最佳拟合分布对康艾注射液组PFS曲线的影响对经济结论的影响。
基础案例结果表明,与参芪扶正注射液组相比,康艾注射液组增量成本为103.38美元,提供了0.217个增量质量调整生命年(QALY)。ICER为476.41美元/QALY,远低于2022年中国人均GDP的一倍支付意愿阈值(12,070美元/QALY)。确定性敏感性分析结果表明,ICER对优势比(OR)值的变化最为敏感。概率敏感性分析证实了基础案例分析结果的稳健性。情景分析结果表明,通过使用对数正态分布拟合康艾注射液组的PFS曲线并将时间跨度缩短至5年,ICER为4,081.83美元/QALY,仍远低于支付意愿阈值。
与参芪扶正注射液联合铂类化疗相比,康艾注射液联合铂类化疗治疗晚期NSCLC似乎更具成本效益。