• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of remifentanil-propofol combination on "muscle relaxant-free" general anesthesia for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized controlled trial.瑞芬太尼-丙泊酚组合用于治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影“无肌松剂”全身麻醉的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Aug 15;15(8):5292-5303. eCollection 2023.
2
The efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate compared with propofol for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography under monitored anesthesia care: A single-center randomized controlled clinical trial.在监护麻醉下,比较甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的有效性和安全性:一项单中心随机对照临床试验。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 24;10(19):e38349. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38349. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
3
Patient-controlled sedation with propofol and remifentanil for ERCP: a randomized, controlled study.患者自控镇静瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚用于 ERCP:一项随机对照研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Feb;73(2):260-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.005.
4
A randomized controlled trial evaluating general endotracheal anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care and the incidence of sedation-related adverse events during ERCP in high-risk patients.一项评价全身气管内麻醉与监护麻醉护理,以及高危患者行 ERCP 时镇静相关不良事件发生率的随机对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Apr;89(4):855-862. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
5
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol for ERCP anesthesia in older patients: A single-center randomized controlled clinical study.西罗莫司与雷帕霉素在肾移植受者中应用的比较
J Clin Anesth. 2024 Dec;99:111609. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111609. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
6
Patient-controlled sedation for ERCP: a randomized double-blind comparison of alfentanil and remifentanil.患者自控镇静在 ERCP 中的应用:阿芬太尼和瑞芬太尼的随机双盲比较。
Endoscopy. 2012 May;44(5):487-92. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291655. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
7
Assessment of the effects of ketamine-fentanyl combination versus propofol-remifentanil combination for sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.评估氯胺酮-芬太尼组合与丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼组合用于内镜逆行胰胆管造影术镇静的效果。
J Res Med Sci. 2014 Sep;19(9):860-6.
8
Anesthesia-administered sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: monitored anesthesia care or general endotracheal anesthesia?内镜逆行胰胆管造影术时的麻醉镇静:监测麻醉管理还是全身气管内麻醉?
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Aug;32(4):531-537. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000741.
9
Ketamine and dexmedetomidine (Keto-dex) or ketamine and propofol (Keto-fol) for procedural sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Which is safer? A randomized clinical trial.氯胺酮和右美托咪定(Keto-dex)或氯胺酮和丙泊酚(Keto-fol)用于内镜逆行胰胆管造影术时的镇静:哪种更安全?一项随机临床试验。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec;41(6):583-590. doi: 10.1007/s12664-022-01291-y. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
10
Etomidate Versus Propofol for Monitored Anesthesia Care During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.依托咪酯与丙泊酚用于内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中监护麻醉的前瞻性随机对照试验
Cureus. 2023 Aug 8;15(8):e43178. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43178. eCollection 2023 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
New Trends in Airway Management During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Narrative Review.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中气道管理的新趋势:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 21;14(16):5905. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165905.
2
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Anesthetic and Sedative Regimens for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Network Meta-Analysis.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术麻醉和镇静方案的比较疗效与安全性:一项网状Meta分析
Dig Dis. 2025;43(1):84-95. doi: 10.1159/000542380. Epub 2024 Nov 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Choice of sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: is monitored anesthesia care as safe as general anesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中镇静方式的选择:监护麻醉与全身麻醉一样安全吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov-Dec;34(6):879-887. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0650. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
2
Safety and sedation-associated adverse event reporting among patients undergoing endoscopic cholangiopancreatography: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜下胆胰管造影术患者的安全性和镇静相关不良事件报告:一项比较系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6977-6989. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08210-2. Epub 2021 May 8.
3
A randomized controlled trial evaluating general endotracheal anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care and the incidence of sedation-related adverse events during ERCP in high-risk patients.一项评价全身气管内麻醉与监护麻醉护理,以及高危患者行 ERCP 时镇静相关不良事件发生率的随机对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Apr;89(4):855-862. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
4
Severe cardiorespiratory complications derived from propofol sedation monitored by an endoscopist.由内镜医师监测的丙泊酚镇静引发的严重心肺并发症。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018 Apr;110(4):237-239. doi: 10.17235/reed.2018.5282/2017.
5
Guidelines for sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy.胃肠内镜检查中的镇静与麻醉指南。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Feb;87(2):327-337. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.018. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
6
Post-induction hypotension and early intraoperative hypotension associated with general anaesthesia.全麻后诱导低血压和术中早期低血压。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Jul 1;119(1):57-64. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex127.
7
Impact of Endotracheal Intubation on Interventional Endoscopy Unit Efficiency Metrics at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center.气管插管对某三级学术医疗中心介入内镜科效率指标的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jun;111(6):800-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.97. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Propofol-Mediated Sedation for Outpatient Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).丙泊酚介导的镇静用于门诊内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的有效性和安全性。
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Jun;61(6):1686-91. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4043-3. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
9
Evidence-Based Selection of Sedation Agents for Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术患者镇静药物的循证选择
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2016 Jan-Feb;39(1):32-41. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000195.
10
Nasotracheal Intubation: An Overview.鼻气管插管术:概述
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2014 Dec;13(4):366-72. doi: 10.1007/s12663-013-0516-5. Epub 2013 May 1.

瑞芬太尼-丙泊酚组合用于治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影“无肌松剂”全身麻醉的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照试验。

Safety and efficacy of remifentanil-propofol combination on "muscle relaxant-free" general anesthesia for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Wu Junbei, Li Nana, Zhang Jigang, Tang Xiaoyang, Cao Xiaofei

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Am J Transl Res. 2023 Aug 15;15(8):5292-5303. eCollection 2023.

PMID:37692944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10492087/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of a "muscle relaxant-free" general anesthesia using a combination of remifentanil and propofol, compared to propofol-based monitored anesthesia care and conventional general anesthesia during therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

METHODS

From September to December 2019, 360 patients scheduled for elective ERCP at the Endoscopy Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were randomly assigned to three different groups: Group (propofol-based monitored anesthesia care, n=120), Group (general anesthesia with neuromuscular blocking agents, n=120), or Group (remifentanil-propofol combination-based muscle relaxant-free general anesthesia, n=120).

RESULTS

The results showed that there was a significant difference in intraprocedural cardiopulmonary adverse events among the three groups (Group , 37.5%; Group , 19.2%; Group , 17.5%; < 0.001). Total time (from patient entry into the Endoscopy Center to departure) and room time (from patient entry into the endoscopy suit to departure) were shorter in Group and Group compared to Group ( < 0.001). Additionally, endoscopist satisfaction levels were significantly higher in Group and Group compared to Group ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The study found that administering propofol-remifentanil combination for "muscle relaxant-free" general anesthesia during therapeutic ERCP was safe and effective. This approach offered greater safety and endoscopist satisfaction than propofol-based monitored anesthesia care, as well as shorter total time and room time than conventional general anesthesia.

摘要

目的

前瞻性评估在治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)期间,使用瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚联合的“无肌松剂”全身麻醉与丙泊酚基础的监护麻醉以及传统全身麻醉相比的安全性和有效性。

方法

2019年9月至12月,南京医科大学第一附属医院内镜中心计划接受择期ERCP的360例患者被随机分配到三个不同组:组(丙泊酚基础的监护麻醉,n = 120)、组(使用神经肌肉阻滞剂的全身麻醉,n = 120)或组(基于瑞芬太尼 - 丙泊酚联合的无肌松剂全身麻醉,n = 120)。

结果

结果显示,三组术中心肺不良事件存在显著差异(组,37.5%;组,19.2%;组,17.5%;P < 0.001)。与组相比,组和组的总时间(从患者进入内镜中心到离开)和房间时间(从患者进入内镜室到离开)更短(P < 0.001)。此外,与组相比,组和组内镜医师的满意度显著更高(P < 0.001)。

结论

该研究发现,在治疗性ERCP期间给予丙泊酚 - 瑞芬太尼联合用于“无肌松剂”全身麻醉是安全有效的。这种方法比丙泊酚基础的监护麻醉具有更高的安全性和内镜医师满意度,并且比传统全身麻醉的总时间和房间时间更短。