EUS-guided percutaneous liver biopsy: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Prospective studies comparing EUS-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) to percutaneous LB (PC-LB) are scarce. We compared the efficacy and safety of EUS-LB with those of PC-LB in a prospective randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

Between 2020 and 2021, patients were enrolled and randomized (1:1 ratio). The primary outcome was defined as the proportion of patients with ≥11 complete portal tracts (CPTs). The sample size (n = 80) was calculated based on the assumption that 60% of those in the EUS-LB and 90% of those in the PC-LB group will have LB with ≥11 CPTs. The secondary outcomes included proportion of patients in whom a diagnosis was established, number of CPTs, pain severity (Numeric Rating Scale-Pain Intensity), duration of hospital stay, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were enrolled (median age, 53 years); 67.5% were female. Sixty percent of those in the EUS-LB and 75.0% of those in the PC-LB group met the primary outcome ( = 0.232). The median number of CPTs was higher in the PC-LB (17 vs 13; = 0.031). The proportion of patients in whom a diagnosis was established was similar between the groups (92.5% [EUS-LB] vs 95.0% [PC-LB]; = 1.0). Patients in the EUS-LB group had less pain severity (median Numeric Rating Scale-Pain Intensity, 2.0 vs 3.0; = 0.003) and shorter hospital stay (2.0 vs 4.0 hours; < 0.0001) compared with the PC-LB group. No patient experienced a serious adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-guided liver biopsy was safe, effective, better tolerated, and associated with a shorter hospital stay.