Suppr超能文献

单期肾实质期计算机断层扫描对肉眼血尿患者检测尿路上皮癌是否足够?一项前瞻性配对非劣效性比较。

Is a Single Nephrographic Phase Computed Tomography Sufficient for Detecting Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Visible Haematuria? A Prospective Paired Noninferiority Comparison.

作者信息

Galtung Kristina F, Lauritzen Peter M, Sandbæk Gunnar, Bay Dag, Ponzi Erica, Baco Eduard, Cowan Nigel C, Naas Anca M, Rud Erik

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Life Sciences and Health, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Jul 19;55:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.06.005. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is uncertainty about the utility of multiphase computed tomography (CT) compared with single-phase CT in the routine examination of patients with visible haematuria (VH).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracies of single nephrographic phase (NP) CT and four-phase CT in detecting urothelial carcinoma (UC).

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a single-centre, prospective, paired, noninferiority study of patients with painless VH referred for CT before cystoscopy between September 2019 and June 2021. Patients were followed up for 1 yr to ascertain UC diagnosis.

INTERVENTION

All patients underwent four-phase CT (control), from which single NP CT (experimental) was extracted. Both were independently assessed for UC.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was the difference in accuracy between the control and experimental CT using a 7.5% noninferiority limit. Histologically verified UC defined a positive reference standard. Secondary outcomes included differences in sensitivity, specificity, negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive values, and area under the curve (AUC). All results are reported per patient.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Of the 308 patients included, UC was diagnosed in 45 (14.6%). The difference in accuracy between the control and experimental CT was 1.9% (95% confidence interval -2.8 to 6.7), demonstrating noninferiority. Sensitivity was 93.3% versus 91.1%, specificity was 83.7% versus 81.8%, NPV was 98.7% versus 98.2%, PPV was 49.4% versus 46.1%, and AUC was 0.96 versus 0.94 for the control versus experimental CT. Limitations included a low number of UC cases and no definite criteria for selecting a noninferiority limit.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of NP CT is not inferior to that of four-phase CT for detecting UC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This study shows that a computed tomography (CT) examination with only one contrast phase is no worse than a more complex CT examination for detecting cancer in the urinary tract among patients presenting with visible blood in the urine.

摘要

背景

在肉眼血尿(VH)患者的常规检查中,与单相计算机断层扫描(CT)相比,多期CT的效用尚不确定。

目的

比较单肾实质期(NP)CT和四期CT检测尿路上皮癌(UC)的准确性。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项单中心、前瞻性、配对、非劣效性研究,研究对象为2019年9月至2021年6月间因无痛性VH在膀胱镜检查前行CT检查的患者。对患者进行1年的随访以确定UC诊断。

干预措施

所有患者均接受四期CT检查(对照),从中提取单NP CT(实验)。两者均独立评估UC情况。

结局测量和统计分析

主要结局是使用7.5%非劣效性界限时对照CT和实验CT在准确性上的差异。经组织学证实的UC定义为阳性参考标准。次要结局包括敏感性、特异性、阴性(NPV)和阳性(PPV)预测值以及曲线下面积(AUC)的差异。所有结果均按患者报告。

结果与局限性

纳入的308例患者中,45例(14.6%)被诊断为UC。对照CT和实验CT在准确性上的差异为1.9%(95%置信区间为-2.8至6.7),表明非劣效性。对照CT与实验CT相比,敏感性分别为93.3%和91.1%,特异性分别为83.7%和81.8%,NPV分别为98.7%和98.2%,PPV分别为49.4%和46.1%,AUC分别为0.96和0.94。局限性包括UC病例数量少以及没有选择非劣效性界限的明确标准。

结论

NP CT检测UC的准确性不低于四期CT。

患者总结

本研究表明,对于出现肉眼血尿的患者,仅进行一个对比期的计算机断层扫描(CT)检查在检测尿路癌症方面并不比更复杂的CT检查差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ef/10485786/341ddaee888e/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验