Alsaafin Nour, Saad Nabil, Mohammad Zadeh Shima A, Hegazy Fatma A
Department of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Research Institute for Medical and Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Sep 5;16:2613-2623. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S420003. eCollection 2023.
Although the inverted technique was shown to be more effective compared to other orthotic designs for the treatment of flatfeet, the biomechanical mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effect of the inverted angle orthoses is still unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the effect of different inverted angles of foot orthoses on walking kinematics in females with flexible flatfeet.
Thirty-one female adults with flexible flatfeet aged 18-35 years old participated in this study. Kinematic data of the hip, knee, and ankle were collected via BTS motion-capture system during walking under three test conditions in random order: with shoes only; with 15° inverted orthoses; and with 25° inverted orthoses.
Compared to the shoes only condition, both the 15° and 25° inverted orthotic conditions significantly decreased the maximum ankle plantarflexion angle during loading response, maximum ankle dorsiflexion angle during mid-stance, maximum ankle external rotation angle, and maximum ankle internal rotation angle. The maximum ankle plantarflexion angle at toe-off showed a significant decrease with the 25° inverted angle orthosis compared to both the 15° inverted angle and shoes only conditions. No significant differences were found in the knee kinematic variables, maximum hip extension angle, and maximum hip adduction angle between test conditions.
Using inverted orthoses at 15° and 25° inverted angles resulted in significant changes in ankle joint kinematics during walking in female adults with flexible flatfeet. A 25° inverted angle orthosis significantly decreased ankle plantarflexion during push-off, potentially impacting gait mechanics. This suggests that a smaller inverted angle may be more effective for managing flexible flatfeet in female adults.
尽管与其他矫正鞋垫设计相比,内翻技术在治疗扁平足方面被证明更有效,但内翻角度矫正鞋垫治疗效果背后的生物力学机制仍不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是探讨不同内翻角度的足部矫正鞋垫对柔韧性扁平足女性步行运动学的影响。
31名年龄在18 - 35岁的柔韧性扁平足成年女性参与了本研究。通过BTS运动捕捉系统在三种测试条件下随机顺序行走时收集髋、膝和踝关节的运动学数据:仅穿鞋子;使用15°内翻矫正鞋垫;使用25°内翻矫正鞋垫。
与仅穿鞋子的情况相比,15°和25°内翻矫正鞋垫条件下,在负重反应期间的最大踝关节跖屈角度、支撑中期的最大踝关节背屈角度、最大踝关节外旋角度和最大踝关节内旋角度均显著降低。与15°内翻角度和仅穿鞋子的情况相比,25°内翻角度矫正鞋垫在足趾离地时的最大踝关节跖屈角度显著降低。在测试条件之间,膝关节运动学变量、最大髋关节伸展角度和最大髋关节内收角度未发现显著差异。
在柔韧性扁平足成年女性行走过程中,使用15°和25°内翻角度的矫正鞋垫会导致踝关节运动学发生显著变化。25°内翻角度的矫正鞋垫在蹬离期显著降低了踝关节跖屈,可能会影响步态力学。这表明较小的内翻角度可能对管理成年女性的柔韧性扁平足更有效。