Suppr超能文献

不同正畸托槽上微生物黏附的比较研究——一项研究

Comparative Study of Microbial Adhesion on Different Orthodontic Brackets - An Study.

作者信息

Tripathi Vartika, Assudani Neha, Alasmari Abdullah S, Meher Jasbir, Khan Salman H, Khan Samir Sahib M N

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Ahmedabad Dental College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Consultant Orthodontist, Riyadh Specialised Dental Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S1270-S1273. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_128_23. Epub 2023 Jul 11.

Abstract

AIM

To study the microbial adhesion on different orthodontic brackets (conventional, ceramic, and self-ligating brackets).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three types of bracket systems i.e. self-ligating, conventional, and ceramic brackets were used consisting of 10 patients for each bracket system. Out of 30 patients 20 patients will be treated with conventional and ceramic brackets, in which, in one-half of the mouth steel ligature ties are placed and in the other half elastomeric rings would be placed. We collected swabs from the central incisors and first premolars of the both the right and left sides of both the maxillary and mandibular arches. The samples were collected three times from the above-mentioned teeth once prior to the placement of the brackets, the second and third samples after one and three months respectively.

RESULT

Significant variations were between the pretreatment and after one and three months of bracket placement in all three groups. Significant increase in the microbial adhesion of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in conventional bracket form pretreatment to one and three months after bracket placement is seen. Although the colony formed by anaerobic bacteria is more in number in comparison to the aerobic bacteria.

CONCLUSION

Our study reveals that the most hygienic bracket is a self-ligating bracket that should be used in patients who have poor oral hygiene. We also found that using steel ligature is more suitable as compared to elastomeric ligature in both conventional and ceramic brackets.

摘要

目的

研究不同正畸托槽(传统托槽、陶瓷托槽和自锁托槽)上的微生物黏附情况。

材料与方法

使用三种托槽系统,即自锁托槽、传统托槽和陶瓷托槽,每种托槽系统有10名患者。在30名患者中,20名患者将使用传统托槽和陶瓷托槽进行治疗,其中,在口腔的一侧放置金属结扎丝,另一侧放置弹性橡皮圈。我们从上下颌牙弓左右两侧的中切牙和第一前磨牙采集拭子。样本从上述牙齿采集三次,一次在放置托槽前,第二次和第三次样本分别在放置托槽后1个月和3个月采集。

结果

所有三组在托槽放置前与放置后1个月和3个月之间均存在显著差异。从传统托槽放置前到放置后1个月和3个月,需氧菌和厌氧菌的微生物黏附均显著增加。尽管厌氧菌形成的菌落数量比需氧菌更多。

结论

我们的研究表明,最卫生的托槽是自锁托槽,应在口腔卫生较差的患者中使用。我们还发现,在传统托槽和陶瓷托槽中,使用金属结扎丝比弹性结扎丝更合适。

相似文献

1
Comparative Study of Microbial Adhesion on Different Orthodontic Brackets - An Study.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S1270-S1273. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_128_23. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
3
Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jul;77(4):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0035-3. Epub 2016 May 24.
5
Friction in a hybrid system. An in vitro study.
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2010 Oct;3(4):2-8. Epub 2011 Jan 23.
6
An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015 Feb;18(1):33-42. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12057. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
9
Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jun;127(6):670-5; quiz 754. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.025.
10
Evaluation of the Demineralization Development around Different Types of Orthodontic Brackets.
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jan 20;16(3):984. doi: 10.3390/ma16030984.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Mechanical and Elemental Properties of Bioceramic-Coated Orthodontic Brackets and Enamel Surface.
Eur J Dent. 2025 May;19(2):389-398. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1789003. Epub 2024 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Feb;32(1):94-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp033. Epub 2009 May 27.
2
Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to different types of brackets.
Angle Orthod. 2007 Nov;77(6):1090-5. doi: 10.2319/091706-375.1.
3
Changes in the subgingival microbiota and periodontal parameters before and 3 months after bracket placement.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Sep;130(3):275.e17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.022.
4
Microbial profile on metallic and ceramic bracket materials.
Angle Orthod. 2002 Aug;72(4):338-43. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0338:MPOMAC>2.0.CO;2.
6
Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to orthodontic brackets.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Oct;114(4):414-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70186-6.
7
Microbial attachment on orthodontic appliances: I. Wettability and early pellicle formation on bracket materials.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Oct;108(4):351-60. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70032-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验