• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative Study of Microbial Adhesion on Different Orthodontic Brackets - An Study.不同正畸托槽上微生物黏附的比较研究——一项研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S1270-S1273. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_128_23. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
2
Comparison of Frictional Forces Generated by a New Ceramic Bracket with the Conventional Brackets using Unconventional and Conventional Ligation System and the Self-ligating Brackets: An In Vitro Study.使用非常规和常规结扎系统以及自结扎托槽,对新型陶瓷托槽与传统托槽产生的摩擦力进行比较:一项体外研究。
J Int Oral Health. 2015 Sep;7(9):108-13.
3
Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.不同结扎系统的自锁托槽和传统托槽的摩擦行为
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jul;77(4):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0035-3. Epub 2016 May 24.
4
Comparison of the friction forces delivered by different elastomeric patterns and metal ligature on conventional metal brackets with a NiTi arch wire versus a self-ligating system: An in vitro study.不同弹性体花纹和金属结扎丝与镍钛弓丝相比对传统金属托槽与自锁托槽系统摩擦力的影响:一项体外研究。
Int Orthod. 2022 Jun;20(2):100633. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100633. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
5
Friction in a hybrid system. An in vitro study.混合系统中的摩擦。一项体外研究。
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2010 Oct;3(4):2-8. Epub 2011 Jan 23.
6
An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.一项关于传统托槽和自锁托槽复杂牙齿排齐效果的体外研究。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015 Feb;18(1):33-42. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12057. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
7
Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.青少年主动自锁式与被动自锁式矫治器和传统矫治器的排齐效率和间隙关闭比较:一项单中心随机对照试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 May;145(5):569-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.024.
8
Adhesion of mutans streptococci to self-ligating ceramic brackets: in vivo quantitative analysis with real-time polymerase chain reaction.变形链球菌与自锁式陶瓷托槽的黏附:实时聚合酶链反应的体内定量分析
Eur J Orthod. 2015 Dec;37(6):565-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju090. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
9
Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules.使用3种弹性体组件时的抗滑动性能
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jun;127(6):670-5; quiz 754. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.025.
10
Evaluation of the Demineralization Development around Different Types of Orthodontic Brackets.不同类型正畸托槽周围脱矿进展的评估
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jan 20;16(3):984. doi: 10.3390/ma16030984.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Mechanical and Elemental Properties of Bioceramic-Coated Orthodontic Brackets and Enamel Surface.生物陶瓷涂层正畸托槽与牙釉质表面的力学性能和元素特性评估
Eur J Dent. 2025 May;19(2):389-398. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1789003. Epub 2024 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets.传统结扎托槽和自锁托槽患者唾液变形链球菌水平。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Feb;32(1):94-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp033. Epub 2009 May 27.
2
Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to different types of brackets.变形链球菌对不同类型托槽的黏附
Angle Orthod. 2007 Nov;77(6):1090-5. doi: 10.2319/091706-375.1.
3
Changes in the subgingival microbiota and periodontal parameters before and 3 months after bracket placement.托槽放置前及放置后3个月龈下微生物群和牙周参数的变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Sep;130(3):275.e17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.022.
4
Microbial profile on metallic and ceramic bracket materials.金属和陶瓷托槽材料上的微生物分布情况
Angle Orthod. 2002 Aug;72(4):338-43. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0338:MPOMAC>2.0.CO;2.
5
Bacterial colonization associated with fixed orthodontic appliances. A scanning electron microscopy study.与固定正畸矫治器相关的细菌定植。一项扫描电子显微镜研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2001 Oct;23(5):475-84. doi: 10.1093/ejo/23.5.475.
6
Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to orthodontic brackets.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Oct;114(4):414-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70186-6.
7
Microbial attachment on orthodontic appliances: I. Wettability and early pellicle formation on bracket materials.正畸矫治器上的微生物附着:I. 托槽材料的润湿性及早期薄膜形成
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Oct;108(4):351-60. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70032-3.
8
Ligature wires and elastomeric rings: two methods of ligation, and their association with microbial colonization of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli.结扎丝和弹性环:两种结扎方法及其与变形链球菌和乳酸菌微生物定植的关联。
Eur J Orthod. 1991 Oct;13(5):416-20. doi: 10.1093/ejo/13.5.416.

不同正畸托槽上微生物黏附的比较研究——一项研究

Comparative Study of Microbial Adhesion on Different Orthodontic Brackets - An Study.

作者信息

Tripathi Vartika, Assudani Neha, Alasmari Abdullah S, Meher Jasbir, Khan Salman H, Khan Samir Sahib M N

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Ahmedabad Dental College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Consultant Orthodontist, Riyadh Specialised Dental Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S1270-S1273. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_128_23. Epub 2023 Jul 11.

DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_128_23
PMID:37694027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10485417/
Abstract

AIM

To study the microbial adhesion on different orthodontic brackets (conventional, ceramic, and self-ligating brackets).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three types of bracket systems i.e. self-ligating, conventional, and ceramic brackets were used consisting of 10 patients for each bracket system. Out of 30 patients 20 patients will be treated with conventional and ceramic brackets, in which, in one-half of the mouth steel ligature ties are placed and in the other half elastomeric rings would be placed. We collected swabs from the central incisors and first premolars of the both the right and left sides of both the maxillary and mandibular arches. The samples were collected three times from the above-mentioned teeth once prior to the placement of the brackets, the second and third samples after one and three months respectively.

RESULT

Significant variations were between the pretreatment and after one and three months of bracket placement in all three groups. Significant increase in the microbial adhesion of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in conventional bracket form pretreatment to one and three months after bracket placement is seen. Although the colony formed by anaerobic bacteria is more in number in comparison to the aerobic bacteria.

CONCLUSION

Our study reveals that the most hygienic bracket is a self-ligating bracket that should be used in patients who have poor oral hygiene. We also found that using steel ligature is more suitable as compared to elastomeric ligature in both conventional and ceramic brackets.

摘要

目的

研究不同正畸托槽(传统托槽、陶瓷托槽和自锁托槽)上的微生物黏附情况。

材料与方法

使用三种托槽系统,即自锁托槽、传统托槽和陶瓷托槽,每种托槽系统有10名患者。在30名患者中,20名患者将使用传统托槽和陶瓷托槽进行治疗,其中,在口腔的一侧放置金属结扎丝,另一侧放置弹性橡皮圈。我们从上下颌牙弓左右两侧的中切牙和第一前磨牙采集拭子。样本从上述牙齿采集三次,一次在放置托槽前,第二次和第三次样本分别在放置托槽后1个月和3个月采集。

结果

所有三组在托槽放置前与放置后1个月和3个月之间均存在显著差异。从传统托槽放置前到放置后1个月和3个月,需氧菌和厌氧菌的微生物黏附均显著增加。尽管厌氧菌形成的菌落数量比需氧菌更多。

结论

我们的研究表明,最卫生的托槽是自锁托槽,应在口腔卫生较差的患者中使用。我们还发现,在传统托槽和陶瓷托槽中,使用金属结扎丝比弹性结扎丝更合适。