带骨增量的 flap 与无 flap 即刻种植体：一项新研究。 （注：这里的“flap”在医学种植领域可能有特定含义，比如 flap surgery 指翻瓣手术，这里不太明确具体所指，但按原文翻译）
Flap versus Flapless Immediate Implants with Bone Augmentation: A Novel Study.
作者信息
Choudhary Deepak, Girdhar Gaurav, Kumar Santosh, Shetty Arvind, Shetty Neetha J, Sinha Sachin
机构信息
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Los Angele, Los Angele, United States of America.
Department of Periodontology, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
出版信息
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S1082-S1085. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_211_23. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to equate implants placed using a traditional flap elevation technique with implants placed using a flapless process regarding bone healing and success in clinical conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sixty subjects were included in this research work. The participants were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in group A underwent implant placement with the flap elevation technique. Similarly, group B patients underwent implant placement without flap reflection. Parameters such as plaque index, wound healing index, crestal bone loss, and radiograph were considered to estimate the effectiveness of the two techniques.
RESULTS
Plaque indexes were improved in both groups. The modified gingival index also improved in all the phases of healing. The flapless method showed a better crestal bone.
CONCLUSION
It can be concluded that this study showed that with the right augmentation techniques, implants could be successfully performed immediate extraction sockets, both with and without elevation of the mucoperiosteal flap.
背景
本研究旨在比较在临床条件下，使用传统翻瓣术植入种植体与不翻瓣种植体植入在骨愈合及成功率方面的情况。
材料与方法
本研究纳入了60名受试者。参与者被随机分为两组。A组患者采用翻瓣术植入种植体。同样，B组患者不翻瓣植入种植体。通过菌斑指数、伤口愈合指数、牙槽嵴骨吸收及影像学检查等参数来评估两种技术的有效性。
结果
两组的菌斑指数均有所改善。改良牙龈指数在愈合的各个阶段也均有改善。不翻瓣方法显示牙槽嵴骨情况更好。
结论
可以得出结论，本研究表明，采用正确的增量技术，无论是否掀起黏骨膜瓣，均可成功地在即刻拔牙窝植入种植体。
Zotero 插件