一项评估牙种植体失败原因的回顾性分析。
A Retrospective Analysis to Assess the Reasons for the Failure of Dental Implants.
作者信息
Yarramsetty Greeshma Vani, Singiri Bindhu Madhavi, Vijay K R, Balaji V C, Anusha Kaki, Thota Roger P
机构信息
Department of Prosthodontics, G Pulla Reddy Dental College, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Department of Dental Surgery, Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.
出版信息
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S1119-S1122. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_195_23. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
BACKGROUND
To assess the reasons for dental implant failures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 100 implants were studied in 80 subjects. The radiographic investigations were performed to assess the record length of implant and diameter of implant. Risk factors, such as habit of smoking, history of diabetes, and hypertension, were recorded. The data were collected and assessed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to assess the failure rate in dental implants. A -value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
A total of 100 dental implants were included. The maximum dental implant failure was seen with a diameter <3.75 mm (30%) followed by 3.75-4.5 mm (16%) and >4.5 mm (6.15%). The difference was found to be significant ( < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Dental implant failure was high in dental implants with <3.75 mm diameter, dental implants with a length <10.0 mm, and among smokers.
背景
评估牙种植体失败的原因。
材料与方法
对80名受试者的100颗种植体进行研究。进行影像学检查以评估种植体的记录长度和直径。记录吸烟习惯、糖尿病史和高血压等危险因素。使用社会科学统计软件包（SPSS）收集和评估数据。采用单因素方差分析（ANOVA）检验评估牙种植体的失败率。P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
结果
共纳入100颗牙种植体。直径<3.75 mm的牙种植体失败率最高（30%），其次是3.75 - 4.5 mm（16%）和>4.5 mm（6.15%）。差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。
结论
直径<3.75 mm的牙种植体、长度<10.0 mm的牙种植体以及吸烟者的牙种植体失败率较高。
Zotero 插件