Lu Siyuan, Hao Jiahua, Yang Hao, Chen Mengya, Lian Jiapan, Chen Yalan, Brown Robert W, Jones Davey L, Wan Zhuoma, Wang Wei, Chang Wenjin, Wu Donghui
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin 130117, China.
Ministry of Education (MOE) Key Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Ecosystem Health, College of Environmental and Resources Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 20;905:166959. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166959. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
There is a growing body of evidence that suggests that both biodegradable and conventional (non-degradable) microplastics (MP) are hazardous to soil health by affecting the delivery of key ecological functions such as litter decomposition, nutrient cycling and water retention. Specifically, soil fauna may be harmed by the presence of MPs while also being involved in their disintegration, degradation, migration and transfer in soil. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the interactions between MPs and soil fauna is essential. Here, we conducted a 120-day soil microcosm experiment applying polyethylene (PE) and polylactic acid (PLA), in the absence/presence of the earthworm Eisenia nordenskioldi to estimate the relative singular and combined impact of MPs and earthworms on the soil bacterial community. Our findings revealed contrasting effects of PE and PLA on the composition and diversity of soil bacteria. All treatments affected the community and network structure of the soil bacterial community. Compared to the control (no MPs or earthworms), PE decreased bacterial alpha diversity, while PLA increased it. Patescibacteria were found to be significantly abundant in the PE group whereas Actinobacteria and Gemmatimonadetes were more abundant in PE, and PLA and earthworms groups. The presence of earthworms appeared to mediate the impact of PE/PLA on soil bacteria, potentially through bacterial consumption or by altering soil properties (e.g., pH, aeration, C availability). Earthworm presence also appeared to promote the chemical aging of PLA. Collectively, our results provide novel insights into the soil-fauna-driven impact of degradable/nondegradable MPs exposure on the long-term environmental risks associated with soil microorganisms.
越来越多的证据表明,可生物降解和传统(不可降解)的微塑料(MP)都会对土壤健康造成危害,因为它们会影响关键生态功能的发挥,如凋落物分解、养分循环和保水。具体而言,土壤动物可能会因微塑料的存在而受到伤害,同时它们也参与了微塑料在土壤中的解体、降解、迁移和转移。因此,全面了解微塑料与土壤动物之间的相互作用至关重要。在这里,我们进行了一项为期120天的土壤微观实验,在有无北极 Eisenia nordenskioldi蚯蚓的情况下应用聚乙烯(PE)和聚乳酸(PLA),以评估微塑料和蚯蚓对土壤细菌群落的相对单一和综合影响。我们的研究结果揭示了PE和PLA对土壤细菌组成和多样性的不同影响。所有处理都影响了土壤细菌群落的群落和网络结构。与对照(无微塑料或蚯蚓)相比,PE降低了细菌的α多样性,而PLA则增加了细菌的α多样性。在PE组中发现Patescibacteria显著丰富,而在PE、PLA和蚯蚓组中放线菌和芽单胞菌更丰富。蚯蚓的存在似乎介导了PE/PLA对土壤细菌的影响,可能是通过细菌消耗或改变土壤性质(如pH值、通气性、碳有效性)。蚯蚓的存在似乎也促进了PLA的化学老化。总的来说,我们的结果为土壤动物驱动的可降解/不可降解微塑料暴露对与土壤微生物相关的长期环境风险的影响提供了新的见解。