• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下腔静脉滤器与导管溶栓治疗深静脉血栓与院内再入院的相关性。

Association of vena cava filters and catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis with hospital readmissions.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI.

Department of Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jan;12(1):101677. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.016. Epub 2023 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.016
PMID:37696417
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11523369/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) affects >350,000 patients each year in the United States. Contemporary rehospitalization rates and predictors of acute DVT have not been well-characterized. We aimed to evaluate the all-cause 30-day readmission rate and its association with catheter-directed thrombolysis and vena cava filters in patients with proximal and caval DVT.

METHODS

Patients with an index hospitalization for acute proximal lower extremity DVT were evaluated for unplanned readmission rates at 30 days using the Nationwide Readmission Database from 2016 to 2017. We used Cox proportional hazard model to determine the predictors of 30-day readmissions and their association with inferior vena cava (IVC) filter and CDT use.

RESULTS

We identified 58,306 adult patients with an index hospitalization for acute proximal DVT. The unplanned 30-day rehospitalization rate was 14.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.5-15.0%). There were 4995 patients (10.0%) who underwent CDT and 6085 (12.2%) who underwent IVC filter placement. In multivariable analysis, only CDT was associated with a lower hazard for rehospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.84; P < .001), whereas IVC filter placement (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.19-1.34; P < .001), Charlson Comorbidity Index of >3 (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.38-1.56; P < .001), malignancy (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.34-1.57; P < .001), and length of stay >5 days (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.33-1.46; P < .001), and acute kidney injury (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.11-1.25; P < .001) were associated with higher readmission rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The 30-day unplanned rehospitalization rate continues to be high in patients with acute proximal DVT. CDT was associated with lower rehospitalization rates, whereas IVC filter placement was associated with increased rehospitalization rates.

摘要

背景

在美国,每年有超过 35 万名患者患有急性深静脉血栓形成(DVT)。目前尚未很好地描述急性 DVT 的再住院率及其预测因素。我们旨在评估近端和腔静脉 DVT 患者的全因 30 天再入院率及其与导管定向溶栓和腔静脉滤器的关系。

方法

使用 2016 年至 2017 年全国再入院数据库,评估索引住院治疗急性下肢近端 DVT 患者的 30 天无计划再入院率。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型来确定 30 天再入院的预测因素及其与下腔静脉(IVC)滤器和 CDT 使用的关系。

结果

我们确定了 58306 名索引住院治疗急性近端 DVT 的成年患者。未计划的 30 天再住院率为 14.7%(95%置信区间[CI],14.5-15.0%)。有 4995 名患者(10.0%)接受了 CDT,6085 名患者(12.2%)接受了 IVC 滤器放置。多变量分析显示,只有 CDT 与较低的再入院风险相关(风险比[HR],0.77;95%CI,0.71-0.84;P<0.001),而 IVC 滤器放置(HR,1.26;95%CI,1.19-1.34;P<0.001),Charlson 合并症指数>3(HR,1.47;95%CI,1.38-1.56;P<0.001),恶性肿瘤(HR,1.45;95%CI,1.34-1.57;P<0.001),住院时间>5 天(HR,1.39;95%CI,1.33-1.46;P<0.001)和急性肾损伤(HR,1.18;95%CI,1.11-1.25;P<0.001)与较高的再入院率相关。

结论

急性近端 DVT 患者的 30 天无计划再入院率仍然很高。CDT 与较低的再入院率相关,而 IVC 滤器放置与较高的再入院率相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b401/11523369/325dd0bd9979/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b401/11523369/f8fc51eaccc6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b401/11523369/1c81d7d83872/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b401/11523369/325dd0bd9979/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b401/11523369/f8fc51eaccc6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b401/11523369/1c81d7d83872/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b401/11523369/325dd0bd9979/fx1.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of vena cava filters and catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis with hospital readmissions.下腔静脉滤器与导管溶栓治疗深静脉血栓与院内再入院的相关性。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jan;12(1):101677. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.016. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
2
Incidence and Outcomes of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Thrombus during Catheter-directed Thrombolysis for Proximal Deep Venous Thrombosis.导管定向溶栓治疗近端深静脉血栓形成期间下腔静脉滤器血栓的发生率及转归
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;38:305-309. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.05.108. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
3
Long-term outcomes of catheter directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis without prophylactic inferior vena cava filter placement.未放置预防性下腔静脉滤器的下肢深静脉血栓形成导管直接溶栓的长期结局
J Vasc Surg. 2007 May;45(5):992-7; discussion 997. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.01.012.
4
Contemporary Trends and Comparative Outcomes With Adjunctive Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement in Patients Undergoing Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Deep Vein Thrombosis in the United States: Insights From the National Inpatient Sample.美国接受导管直接溶栓治疗的深静脉血栓形成患者中放置下腔静脉滤器的当代趋势和比较结果:来自全国住院患者样本的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 23;11(14):1390-1397. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.048.
5
Efficacy of Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement in the Prevention of Pulmonary Embolism during Catheter-Directed Thrombectomy for Proximal Lower-Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis.可回收下腔静脉滤器置入在近端下肢深静脉血栓形成导管直接溶栓治疗期间预防肺栓塞的疗效
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 May;33:181-6. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.10.034. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
6
Sex differences in utilization and outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with proximal lower extremity deep venous thrombosis - Insights from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.下肢近端深静脉血栓形成患者导管直接溶栓治疗的利用情况和结局的性别差异——来自全国住院患者样本的见解
Vasc Med. 2017 Apr;22(2):128-134. doi: 10.1177/1358863X17694091. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
7
Impact of inferior vena cava thrombus extension on thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral thrombosis.下腔静脉血栓延伸对急性髂股静脉血栓形成溶栓治疗的影响。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016 Oct;4(4):385-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
8
In-hospital outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis versus anticoagulation in cancer patients with proximal deep venous thrombosis.癌症合并近端深静脉血栓患者导管溶栓与抗凝治疗的院内转归比较。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Jul;8(4):538-544.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.10.014. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
9
Association of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement With Rates of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Cancer and Acute Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis.下腔静脉滤器置入与癌症合并急性下肢深静脉血栓患者肺栓塞发生率的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011079. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11079.
10
Thrombus embolization into IVC filters during catheter-directed thrombolysis for proximal deep venous thrombosis.在导管定向溶栓治疗近端深静脉血栓形成过程中,血栓栓塞至下腔静脉滤器内。
J Endovasc Ther. 2008 Oct;15(5):605-13. doi: 10.1583/08-2462.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the efficacy of recombinant human pro-urokinase in catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis patients.探索重组人尿激酶原在急性下肢深静脉血栓形成患者导管直接溶栓中的疗效。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04800-x.
2
2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.《2025年心脏病和中风统计数据:美国心脏协会关于美国和全球数据的报告》
Circulation. 2025 Feb 25;151(8):e41-e660. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001303. Epub 2025 Jan 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of life after pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for proximal deep venous thrombosis.经导管药物溶栓治疗近端深静脉血栓形成后的生活质量。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Jan;8(1):8-23.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.03.023.
2
Utilization and Outcomes of Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Nationwide Cohort Study.溶栓治疗急性肺栓塞的利用和结局:一项全国性队列研究。
Chest. 2020 Mar;157(3):645-653. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.10.049. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
3
Readmission Rates and Their Impact on Hospital Financial Performance: A Study of Washington Hospitals.
再入院率及其对医院财务绩效的影响:华盛顿医院研究
Inquiry. 2019 Jan-Dec;56:46958019860386. doi: 10.1177/0046958019860386.
4
Endovascular Thrombus Removal for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis.急性髂股静脉血栓形成的血管内血栓切除术。
Circulation. 2019 Feb 26;139(9):1162-1173. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037425.
5
Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Deep-Vein Thrombosis.药物机械性导管定向溶栓治疗深静脉血栓形成
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 7;377(23):2240-2252. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615066.
6
IVC filters-Trends in placement and indications, a study of 2 populations.下腔静脉滤器——置入情况及适应证的趋势,一项对两组人群的研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(12):e6449. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006449.
7
Inferior Vena Cava Thrombosis.下腔静脉血栓形成。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr 11;9(7):629-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.12.268. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
8
The economic burden of incident venous thromboembolism in the United States: A review of estimated attributable healthcare costs.美国新发静脉血栓栓塞症的经济负担:对估计的可归因医疗费用的综述。
Thromb Res. 2016 Jan;137:3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.11.033. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
9
Effect of a retrievable inferior vena cava filter plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone on risk of recurrent pulmonary embolism: a randomized clinical trial.可回收下腔静脉滤器联合抗凝与单纯抗凝对复发性肺栓塞风险的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Apr 28;313(16):1627-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3780.
10
Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone to treat lower-extremity proximal deep vein thrombosis.比较导管溶栓联合抗凝与单纯抗凝治疗下肢近端深静脉血栓的疗效。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Sep;174(9):1494-501. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3415.