• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同高度和楼层体系的钢筋混凝土建筑的非线性分析

Nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings with different heights and floor systems.

作者信息

Abd-Elhamed Ayman, Mahmoud Sayed, Alotaibi Khalid Saqer

机构信息

Physics and Engineering Mathematics Department, Faculty of Engineering-Mattaria, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt.

Faculty of Engineering, King Salman International University, South Sinai, El-Tur, Egypt.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 11;13(1):14949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41656-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-41656-7
PMID:37697013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10495357/
Abstract

Most civil structures exhibit nonlinear behavior during moderate to severe earthquakes. Consequently, inelastic analysis is needed for seismic design. Several dynamic and static analysis methods are available for the assessment and design of engineering structures. Two of the available methods in terms of nonlinear dynamic time history analysis and nonlinear static analysis, which is known as pushover analysis, are employed herein to comprehensively study and investigate the seismic performance of multi-story building structures with different floor systems. Moreover, the study is extended to assess the actual values of the response reduction/modification factor (R-factor) for each building model, then evaluate the values with the code-recommended design values. Three-dimensional finite element building models with 5, 10 and 15 stories are developed for the evaluation process. The advanced computer program ETABS is used for developing and analyzing the buildings considering material and geometrical nonlinearity. A suit of seven earthquake records is considered and scaled according to the ASCE-16 seismic design code to excite the building models. The obtained results evidently reveal that the type of floor slab significantly impacts the seismic response of the building. More specifically, the effects of floor slabs on seismic demands are more evident in low- and mid-rise buildings. In addition, the type of slab system and height of the building have more influence on the response modification factors, especially for low-rise building models.

摘要

大多数土木结构在中等到强烈地震期间会表现出非线性行为。因此,地震设计需要进行非弹性分析。有几种动态和静态分析方法可用于工程结构的评估和设计。本文采用非线性动力时程分析和非线性静力分析(即推覆分析)这两种可用方法,全面研究和调查具有不同楼盖体系的多高层建筑结构的抗震性能。此外,该研究还扩展到评估每个建筑模型的反应折减/修正系数(R 因子)的实际值,然后将这些值与规范推荐的设计值进行比较。为评估过程开发了5层、10层和15层的三维有限元建筑模型。使用先进的计算机程序ETABS来开发和分析考虑材料和几何非线性的建筑物。考虑了一组七条地震记录,并根据ASCE - 16抗震设计规范进行缩放,以激励建筑模型。所得结果清楚地表明,楼盖类型对建筑物的地震响应有显著影响。更具体地说,楼盖对地震需求的影响在低层和中层建筑中更为明显。此外,楼盖体系类型和建筑物高度对反应修正系数有更大影响,特别是对于低层建筑模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/6c4e656433ff/41598_2023_41656_Fig23_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/750df19164b4/41598_2023_41656_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/ba37ec47b030/41598_2023_41656_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/c0b451ca2189/41598_2023_41656_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/21bda8baf4d1/41598_2023_41656_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/00cda165b159/41598_2023_41656_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/f1055812166b/41598_2023_41656_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/3d4b45272ecd/41598_2023_41656_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/af07e5b5d8a7/41598_2023_41656_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/2b58da5446b6/41598_2023_41656_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/9799c7791105/41598_2023_41656_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/36e890b00fa2/41598_2023_41656_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/702c1e56c7ed/41598_2023_41656_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/f0685fa03112/41598_2023_41656_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/fc1a596f8b99/41598_2023_41656_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/818759de5e29/41598_2023_41656_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/0cf55db3c9f7/41598_2023_41656_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/aadf28ae414d/41598_2023_41656_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/8b39fd3c0279/41598_2023_41656_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/2ec16442d724/41598_2023_41656_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/5788c583b88d/41598_2023_41656_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/9ca893f45e53/41598_2023_41656_Fig21_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/5392ca81a0ee/41598_2023_41656_Fig22_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/6c4e656433ff/41598_2023_41656_Fig23_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/750df19164b4/41598_2023_41656_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/ba37ec47b030/41598_2023_41656_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/c0b451ca2189/41598_2023_41656_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/21bda8baf4d1/41598_2023_41656_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/00cda165b159/41598_2023_41656_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/f1055812166b/41598_2023_41656_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/3d4b45272ecd/41598_2023_41656_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/af07e5b5d8a7/41598_2023_41656_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/2b58da5446b6/41598_2023_41656_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/9799c7791105/41598_2023_41656_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/36e890b00fa2/41598_2023_41656_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/702c1e56c7ed/41598_2023_41656_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/f0685fa03112/41598_2023_41656_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/fc1a596f8b99/41598_2023_41656_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/818759de5e29/41598_2023_41656_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/0cf55db3c9f7/41598_2023_41656_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/aadf28ae414d/41598_2023_41656_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/8b39fd3c0279/41598_2023_41656_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/2ec16442d724/41598_2023_41656_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/5788c583b88d/41598_2023_41656_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/9ca893f45e53/41598_2023_41656_Fig21_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/5392ca81a0ee/41598_2023_41656_Fig22_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbb/10495357/6c4e656433ff/41598_2023_41656_Fig23_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings with different heights and floor systems.不同高度和楼层体系的钢筋混凝土建筑的非线性分析
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 11;13(1):14949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41656-7.
2
Specific seismic retrofitting of a compact reinforced concrete building with X-bracings and steel jackets. Application to a primary school in Huelva.采用 X 支撑和钢套对紧凑型钢筋混凝土建筑进行具体的抗震加固。应用于韦尔瓦的一所小学。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0238505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238505. eCollection 2020.
3
Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.地震震动与建筑物损坏:近期关于强烈地面震动的证据引发了对建筑物抗震能力的质疑。
Science. 1975 Aug 22;189(4203):601-8. doi: 10.1126/science.189.4203.601.
4
Development of seismic vulnerability index methodology for reinforced concrete buildings based on nonlinear parametric analyses.基于非线性参数分析的钢筋混凝土建筑地震易损性指数方法的开发。
MethodsX. 2019 Jan 26;6:199-211. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.01.006. eCollection 2019.
5
Development and present status of seismic evaluation and seismic retrofit of existing reinforced concrete buildings in Japan.日本既有钢筋混凝土建筑的抗震评估与抗震加固的发展与现状。
Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2021;97(7):402-422. doi: 10.2183/pjab.97.021.
6
The Effect of Soil-Structure Interaction on the Seismic Response of Structures Using Machine Learning, Finite Element Modeling and ASCE 7-16 Methods.利用机器学习、有限元建模和 ASCE 7-16 方法研究土-结构相互作用对结构地震反应的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 11;23(4):2047. doi: 10.3390/s23042047.
7
Progressive collapse potential of different types of irregular buildings located in diverse seismic sites.位于不同地震场地的不同类型不规则建筑的连续倒塌可能性。
Heliyon. 2019 Jan 16;5(1):e01137. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01137. eCollection 2019 Jan.
8
Seismic vulnerability assessment to earthquake at urban scale: A case of Mostaganem city in Algeria.城市尺度下地震对地震的脆弱性评估:以阿尔及利亚的莫斯塔加内姆市为例。
Jamba. 2018 Mar 27;10(1):473. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v10i1.473. eCollection 2018.
9
Seismic performance and cost comparison of RC moment resisting and dual frames using UBC 97 and IBC 2021.使用UBC 97和IBC 2021规范的钢筋混凝土抗弯框架和双重抗侧力体系的抗震性能及成本比较
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 16;14(1):16349. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67373-3.
10
Evaluation of seismic performance and effectiveness of multiple slim-type damper system for seismic response control of building structures.建筑结构地震响应控制中多重细长型阻尼器系统的抗震性能及有效性评估
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:189106. doi: 10.1155/2014/189106. Epub 2014 Sep 11.