Suppr超能文献

基于多重耐药菌感染风险的重症监护病房经验性抗菌治疗:日本单中心血培养结果的病例对照研究。

Empiric antimicrobial therapy in the intensive care unit based on the risk of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection: a single-centre case‒control study of blood culture results in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, 3211, Kozukue, Kouhoku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 222-0036, Japan.

Graduate School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Sep 12;12(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01303-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infections and sepsis are the leading causes of death in intensive care units (ICUs). Antimicrobial agent selection is challenging because the intervention is directly related to the outcome, and the problem of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) must be considered. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to clarify the epidemiological data and examine whether the detection rate of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria differed depending on the presence or absence of the risk of MDR bacterial infections to establish guidance regarding the choice of antimicrobial therapy for ICU patients.

METHODS

This retrospective case‒control study was performed in a single ICU in Japan. Patients admitted to the ICU who underwent blood culture (BC) analysis were considered for inclusion in this study; patients were at risk of MDR bacterial infections, and controls were not. The primary outcome measure was the detection rate of MDR bacteria in BCs collected from patients and controls. The secondary outcome measure was the selection rate of anti-Pseudomonas and anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) drugs for patients and controls.

RESULTS

Among the 1,730 patients admitted to the ICU during the study period, BCs were obtained from 186 patients, and 173 samples were finally included in the analysis (n = 129 cases; n = 44 controls). No MDR bacteria or Pseudomonas aeruginosa were detected in the controls (14 (11%) vs. 0 (0%)) (P = 0.014) However, there was no difference in empiric antimicrobials, including anti-MRSA (30 (23%) vs. 12 (27%)) (P = 0.592) and anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa (61 (47%) vs. 16 (36%)) (P = 0.208) drugs, that were administered to the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in critically ill patients in the ICU, MDR bacteria are unlikely to be detected in patients without the risk of MDR bacterial infections. Therefore, for such patients, a strategy of starting empiric narrow-spectrum antimicrobial therapy rather than empiric broad-spectrum therapy should be considered. This strategy, in conjunction with daily updates of clinical and epidemiological data at each facility, will promote the appropriate use of antimicrobials and reduce the emergence of MDR bacteria in the ICU.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

None.

摘要

背景

感染和败血症是重症监护病房(ICU)患者死亡的主要原因。抗菌药物的选择具有挑战性,因为干预措施与结果直接相关,而且必须考虑到抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)的问题。因此,在这项研究中,我们旨在阐明流行病学数据,并研究是否存在多药耐药(MDR)细菌感染的风险会影响 MDR 细菌的检出率,以确定 ICU 患者抗菌治疗的选择指南。

方法

这是一项在日本单家 ICU 进行的回顾性病例对照研究。纳入接受 ICU 治疗且进行血培养(BC)分析的患者;根据是否存在 MDR 细菌感染风险,将患者分为感染组和对照组。主要观察指标为患者和对照组 BC 中 MDR 细菌的检出率。次要观察指标为患者和对照组选择抗假单胞菌和抗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)药物的比率。

结果

在研究期间,1730 名入住 ICU 的患者中,有 186 名患者进行了 BC 检测,最终有 173 份标本纳入分析(n=129 例;n=44 例对照组)。对照组未检出 MDR 细菌或铜绿假单胞菌(14(11%)比 0(0%))(P=0.014)。然而,两组患者经验性抗菌药物的选择率无差异,包括抗 MRSA(30(23%)比 12(27%))(P=0.592)和抗铜绿假单胞菌(61(47%)比 16(36%))(P=0.208)药物。

结论

即使在 ICU 重症患者中,无 MDR 细菌感染风险的患者也不太可能检出 MDR 细菌。因此,对于此类患者,应考虑采用经验性窄谱抗菌治疗策略,而非经验性广谱治疗策略。这种策略结合每个医疗机构的临床和流行病学数据的每日更新,将促进抗菌药物的合理使用,减少 ICU 中 MDR 细菌的出现。

试验注册

无。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02d8/10496235/4745c8b3cd83/13756_2023_1303_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验