Suppr超能文献

初始经验性碳青霉烯类治疗的危重症患者死亡率无改善,且与更长时间使用相关的多药耐药病原体检出率更高:一项前瞻性队列研究的事后分析。

No improvement in mortality among critically ill patients with carbapenems as initial empirical therapy and more detection of multi-drug resistant pathogens associated with longer use: a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jul 2;12(7):e0034224. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00342-24. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

Abstract

Whether empirical therapy with carbapenems positively affects the outcomes of critically ill patients with bacterial infections remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether the use of carbapenems as the initial antimicrobial administration reduces mortality and whether the duration of carbapenem use affects the detection of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. This was a post hoc analysis of data acquired from Japanese participating sites from a multicenter, prospective observational study [Determinants of Antimicrobial Use and De-escalation in Critical Care (DIANA study)]. A total of 268 adult patients with clinically suspected or confirmed bacterial infections from 31 Japanese intensive care units (ICUs) were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: patients who were administered carbapenems as initial antimicrobials (initial carbapenem group, = 99) and those who were not administered carbapenems (initial non-carbapenem group, = 169). The primary outcomes were mortality at day 28 and detection of MDR pathogens. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that mortality at day 28 did not differ between the two groups [18 (18%) vs 27 (16%), respectively; odds ratio: 1.25 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-2.65), = 0.564]. The subdistribution hazard ratio for detecting MDR pathogens on day 28 per additional day of carbapenem use is 1.08 (95% CI: 1.05-1.13, < 0.001 using the Fine-Gray model with death regarded as a competing event). In conclusion, in-hospital mortality was similar between the groups, and a longer duration of carbapenem use as the initial antimicrobial therapy resulted in a higher risk of detection of new MDR pathogens.IMPORTANCEWe found no statistical difference in mortality with the empirical use of carbapenems as initial antimicrobial therapy among critically ill patients with bacterial infections. Our study revealed a lower proportion of inappropriate initial antimicrobial administrations than those reported in previous studies. This result suggests the importance of appropriate risk assessment for the involvement of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens and the selection of suitable antibiotics based on risk. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate that a longer duration of carbapenem use as initial therapy is associated with a higher risk of subsequent detection of MDR pathogens. This finding underscores the importance of efforts to minimize the duration of carbapenem use as initial antimicrobial therapy when it is necessary.

摘要

碳青霉烯类经验性治疗是否对重症细菌感染患者的结局有积极影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨碳青霉烯类药物作为初始抗菌药物治疗是否降低死亡率,以及碳青霉烯类药物使用时间是否影响检测到多重耐药(MDR)病原体。这是一项来自日本参与单位的多中心前瞻性观察研究[重症监护抗生素使用和降阶梯的决定因素(DIANA 研究)]的事后分析。共纳入 31 家日本重症监护病房(ICU)的 268 例临床疑似或确诊细菌感染的成年患者。将患者分为两组:接受碳青霉烯类药物作为初始抗生素治疗的患者(初始碳青霉烯组,=99)和未接受碳青霉烯类药物治疗的患者(初始非碳青霉烯组,=169)。主要结局为 28 天死亡率和检测到 MDR 病原体。多变量 logistic 回归分析显示,两组 28 天死亡率无差异[18(18%)vs 27(16%);比值比:1.25(95%置信区间:0.59-2.65),=0.564]。碳青霉烯类药物使用每增加 1 天,28 天检测到 MDR 病原体的亚分布风险比为 1.08(95%置信区间:1.05-1.13,Fine-Gray 模型下,死亡视为竞争事件,<0.001)。结论:两组患者院内死亡率相似,碳青霉烯类药物作为初始抗菌治疗的使用时间延长与新检出 MDR 病原体的风险增加相关。

意义

我们发现,在重症细菌感染患者中,经验性使用碳青霉烯类药物作为初始抗菌治疗的死亡率无统计学差异。我们的研究显示,初始抗菌药物治疗的不合理应用比例低于以往研究报道。这一结果表明,根据风险评估,选择合适的抗生素,对 MDR 病原体的参与进行适当的评估非常重要。据我们所知,本研究首次表明,初始治疗中碳青霉烯类药物使用时间延长与随后检测到 MDR 病原体的风险增加相关。这一发现强调了在需要时努力减少碳青霉烯类药物作为初始抗菌治疗的使用时间的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ef/11218456/11808551bbb6/spectrum.00342-24.f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验