Papri Nowshin, Islam Zhahirul, Ara Gulshan, Saha Tamal, Leonhard Sonja E, Endtz Hubert P, Jacobs Bart C, Mohammad Quazi D
Laboratory of Gut-Brain Axis, Infectious Diseases Division (IDD), icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2023 Dec;28(4):564-577. doi: 10.1111/jns.12597. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
Considerable variation in clinical practice for management of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) has been observed worldwide. Diagnosis and treatment are challenging in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) due to lack of facilities and treatment availability. We aimed to evaluate current clinical practice and limitations and to provide recommendation for GBS management in low-resource settings.
We conducted an explanatory-sequential mixed-methods survey among neurologists and internists working in tertiary and secondary government hospitals in Bangladesh. There were two phases: (1) quantitative (cross-sectional survey to evaluate clinical practice and limitations); (2) qualitative (key informant interview to explain certain clinical practice and provide recommendations for GBS management in LMIC). Data were analyzed by frequencies, χ test and thematic analysis.
Among 159 physicians (65 neurologists and 94 internists), 11% and 8% physicians used Brighton and NINDS criteria respectively to diagnose GBS. Specific treatment protocols of GBS were used by 12% physicians. Overcrowding of patients, inadequate diagnostic facilities, high costs of standard therapy, and inadequate logistics and trained personnel for intensive care unit and rehabilitation services were considered major challenges for GBS management. In qualitative part, respondents recommended regular training for the physicians, development of cost-effective treatment strategies and appropriate patients' referral and management guideline considering existing limitations in health service delivery and socio-economic status of the country.
Current study design and recommendations might be applied for other LMIC. Such data can assist policymakers to identify areas requiring urgent attention and take required action to improve GBS management in LMIC.
全球范围内观察到格林-巴利综合征(GBS)管理的临床实践存在显著差异。由于缺乏设施和治疗资源,低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的诊断和治疗具有挑战性。我们旨在评估当前的临床实践及其局限性,并为资源匮乏地区的GBS管理提供建议。
我们对在孟加拉国三级和二级政府医院工作的神经科医生和内科医生进行了一项解释性序列混合方法调查。分为两个阶段:(1)定量研究(横断面调查以评估临床实践和局限性);(2)定性研究(关键信息访谈以解释某些临床实践并为LMIC的GBS管理提供建议)。数据通过频率、χ检验和主题分析进行分析。
在159名医生(65名神经科医生和94名内科医生)中,分别有11%和8%的医生使用布莱顿标准和美国国立神经疾病与中风研究所(NINDS)标准诊断GBS。12%的医生使用GBS的特定治疗方案。患者过度拥挤、诊断设施不足、标准治疗成本高以及重症监护病房和康复服务的后勤和训练有素的人员不足被认为是GBS管理的主要挑战。在定性部分,受访者建议对医生进行定期培训,制定具有成本效益的治疗策略,并考虑到该国卫生服务提供和社会经济状况的现有局限性,制定适当的患者转诊和管理指南。
当前的研究设计和建议可能适用于其他LMIC。这些数据可以帮助政策制定者确定需要紧急关注的领域,并采取必要行动改善LMIC的GBS管理。