Suppr超能文献

主动脉瓣和冠状动脉疾病患者行经皮(TAVI+PCI)和外科联合治疗(SAVR+CABG)的趋势和结果:国家再入院数据库(NRD)分析。

Trends and outcomes of combined percutaneous (TAVI+PCI) and surgical approach (SAVR+CABG) for patients with aortic valve and coronary artery disease: A National Readmission Database (NRD) analysis.

机构信息

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Guntur Medical College, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov;102(5):946-957. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30832. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and concomitant severe coronary artery disease (CAD), the relative merits of a combined percutaneous (transcatheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI] and percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]] versus surgical approach (surgical aortic valve replacement [SAVR] and coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]) remain unknown.

AIMS

To determine the utility of combined percutaneous versus surgical approaches in patients with severe AS and CAD.

METHODS

The National Readmission Database (NRD) (2015-2019) was queried to identify all cases of TAVI+PCI and SAVR+CABG. The adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of mortality, stroke, and its composite (major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]) were calculated using a propensity-score matched (PSM) analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 89,314 (5358 TAVI+PCI, 83,956 SAVR+CABG) patients were included in the crude analysis. There was a gradual increase in the utilization of TAVI+PCI from 2016 to 2019 by 2%-4% per year. Using PSM, a subset of 11,361 (5358 TAVI+PCI, 6003 SAVR+CABG) patients with a balanced set of demographics and baseline comorbidities was selected. During index hospitalization, the adjusted odds of MACE (aOR 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.83), and all-cause mortality (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.57-0.81) were significantly lower in patients undergoing TAVI+PCI compared with SAVR+CABG. However, patients undergoing TAVI+PCI had a higher incidence of MACE (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.05-1.87), and mortality (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.22-2.50) at 30-days. The risk of index-admission (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.62-1.09) and 30-day (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.51-1.51) stroke was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients with severe AS and concomitant CAD, a combined percutaneous approach (TAVR+PCI) compared with SAVR+CABG may confer a lower risk of MACE and mortality during index admission but a higher incidence of 30-day complications.

摘要

背景

在患有严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)和严重冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者中,经皮联合治疗(经导管主动脉瓣植入术[TAVI]和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗[PCI])与外科治疗(主动脉瓣置换术[SAVR]和冠状动脉旁路移植术[CABG])的相对优势仍不清楚。

目的

确定严重 AS 和 CAD 患者联合经皮与外科治疗方法的效果。

方法

从国家再入院数据库(NRD)(2015-2019 年)中查询所有 TAVI+PCI 和 SAVR+CABG 病例。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析计算死亡率、卒中和复合终点(主要不良心血管事件[MACE])的调整比值比(aOR)。

结果

共纳入 89314 例(TAVI+PCI 组 5358 例,SAVR+CABG 组 83956 例)患者进行了粗分析。从 2016 年到 2019 年,TAVI+PCI 的使用率每年以 2%-4%的速度逐渐增加。通过 PSM,选择了一组 11361 例(TAVI+PCI 组 5358 例,SAVR+CABG 组 6003 例)具有平衡的人口统计学和基线合并症特征的患者。在住院期间,与 SAVR+CABG 相比,接受 TAVI+PCI 的患者的 MACE(aOR 0.72,95%置信区间[CI]0.62-0.83)和全因死亡率(aOR 0.68,95%CI0.57-0.81)的调整比值显著降低。然而,接受 TAVI+PCI 的患者在 30 天时发生 MACE(aOR 1.40,95%CI1.05-1.87)和死亡率(aOR 1.75,95%CI1.22-2.50)的发生率更高。两组的指数住院(aOR 0.82,95%CI0.62-1.09)和 30 天(aOR 0.88,95%CI0.51-1.51)卒中风险相似。

结论

在患有严重 AS 和同时合并 CAD 的选定患者中,与 SAVR+CABG 相比,联合经皮治疗(TAVR+PCI)可能会降低指数住院期间的 MACE 和死亡率风险,但会增加 30 天并发症的发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验