Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Bernstein Clinical Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Adv Ther. 2023 Nov;40(11):4721-4740. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02647-2. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
Patients with uncontrolled, allergic severe asthma may be prescribed biologic therapies to reduce exacerbations and improve disease control. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of these therapies have differed in design, with varying results overall and by baseline blood eosinophil count (BEC). This study describes published annualized asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) reductions from RCTs in patients with allergic severe asthma, overall and by baseline BEC category. A literature search was performed to identify published phase 3 RCT data of US Food and Drug Administration-approved biologics for severe asthma in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and confirmed sensitization to perennial aeroallergens. Analyses focused on AAER reduction versus placebo in the overall population and/or in those with an elevated or low BEC at baseline or screening. Baseline serum total immunoglobulin E levels varied between RCT populations. In patients with allergic severe asthma across all BEC categories, data were available for tezepelumab, dupilumab, benralizumab and omalizumab only; the greatest AAER reduction was observed with tezepelumab. In patients with allergic severe asthma and BECs of ≥ 260 cells/µL or ≥ 300 cells/μL, AAER reductions were observed with all biologics (tezepelumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab and omalizumab); the greatest AAER reduction was observed with tezepelumab and the smallest AAER reduction was observed with omalizumab. In patients with allergic severe asthma and BECs of < 260 cells/µL or < 300 cells/μL (regardless of historical BEC), an AAER reduction was observed with tezepelumab but not with benralizumab or omalizumab. Differential mechanisms of action may explain the differences in results observed between biologics. Among patients with allergic severe asthma, the efficacy of biologics in RCTs varied considerably overall and by BEC. Tezepelumab was the only biologic to demonstrate AAER reductions consistently across all subgroups. These differences can inform provider treatment decisions when selecting biologic treatments for patients with allergic severe asthma.
患有未控制的、过敏的严重哮喘的患者可能会被处方生物疗法,以减少恶化并改善疾病控制。这些疗法的随机对照试验 (RCT) 在设计上有所不同,总体结果和基线血嗜酸性粒细胞计数 (BEC) 结果也有所不同。本研究描述了已发表的 RCT 中患有过敏性严重哮喘的患者的哮喘恶化年发生率 (AAER) 降低情况,总体情况以及根据基线 BEC 类别情况。进行了文献检索,以确定已发表的美国食品和药物管理局批准的用于严重哮喘患者的生物制剂的 3 期 RCT 数据,这些患者有严重、未控制的哮喘,并且对常年气传过敏原过敏。分析侧重于总体人群中和/或在基线或筛选时 BEC 升高或降低的人群中 AAER 降低与安慰剂的比较。RCT 人群之间的基线血清总免疫球蛋白 E 水平不同。在所有 BEC 类别的过敏性严重哮喘患者中,仅可获得 tezepelumab、dupilumab、benralizumab 和 omalizumab 的数据;观察到最大的 AAER 降低是在 tezepelumab 中。在 BEC 为 ≥260 细胞/µL 或 ≥300 细胞/μL 的过敏性严重哮喘患者中,所有生物制剂(tezepelumab、dupilumab、mepolizumab、benralizumab 和 omalizumab)均观察到 AAER 降低;观察到最大的 AAER 降低是在 tezepelumab 中,最小的 AAER 降低是在 omalizumab 中。在 BEC 为 <260 细胞/µL 或 <300 细胞/μL 的过敏性严重哮喘患者中(无论历史 BEC 如何),tezepelumab 观察到 AAER 降低,但 benralizumab 或 omalizumab 未观察到。作用机制的差异可能解释了生物制剂之间观察到的结果差异。在过敏性严重哮喘患者中,生物制剂在 RCT 中的疗效总体上差异很大,且与 BEC 相关。Tezepelumab 是唯一一种在所有亚组中均能持续观察到 AAER 降低的生物制剂。这些差异可以为医生在为过敏性严重哮喘患者选择生物治疗时提供治疗决策信息。