Suppr超能文献

CRP 与 SAA 对炎性肝腺瘤的鉴别诊断价值。

CRP Versus SAA for Identification of Inflammatory Hepatic Adenomas.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, National University Hospital, Singapore.

Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2023 Oct 1;31(9):590-595. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000001155. Epub 2023 Sep 13.

Abstract

Subtyping hepatic adenomas is important for patient management due to differing complication risks. Immunohistochemical staining with C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid-A (SAA) is widely accepted as a surrogate for molecular classification to identify inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas. Limited data, however, has been published on how these 2 stains compare for sensitivity. We conducted a large, multicenter, retrospective study to examine the sensitivity and staining characteristics of CRP and SAA in inflammatory hepatic adenomas, with focal nodular hyperplasia (FNHs) as a control group. Inflammatory adenomas were identified in 133 patients (average age 37 years, 109 were female). In all, 69.9% of cases were resection specimens and 90.2% of all cases showed positive staining for both CRP and SAA; 10 (7.5%) were positive for CRP only and 3 (2.3%) were positive for SAA only. CRP was more sensitive than SAA (97.74% vs. 92.48%, P -value = 0.0961) and showed more extensive and intense staining, with a significantly higher modified H-score ( P <0.001). Focal nodular hyperplasia can also show positive CRP and SAA staining but with a lower modified H-score ( P <0.0001). Based on beta-catenin and glutamine synthetase staining, 26 of inflammatory adenomas also had beta-catenin activation (19.5%). All 3 cases with positive SAA and negative CRP staining were beta-catenin activated. In contrast, the proportion of cases that were CRP positive and SAA negative was similar regardless of beta-catenin activation. The data affirms the strategy of using both CRP and SAA immunostains for hepatic adenoma subtyping and raises the awareness of the highly variable nature of SAA staining characteristics.

摘要

对肝脏腺瘤进行亚型分类对于患者管理很重要,因为不同亚型的并发症风险不同。使用 C 反应蛋白(CRP)和血清淀粉样蛋白-A(SAA)进行免疫组织化学染色已被广泛接受,可作为分子分类的替代方法来识别炎症性肝细胞腺瘤。然而,关于这两种染色方法的敏感性比较,发表的数据有限。我们进行了一项大型、多中心、回顾性研究,以检查 CRP 和 SAA 在炎症性肝脏腺瘤中的敏感性和染色特征,并将局灶性结节性增生(FNH)作为对照组。共在 133 名患者(平均年龄 37 岁,109 名女性)中发现了炎症性腺瘤。所有病例中,69.9%为切除标本,90.2%的病例均对 CRP 和 SAA 呈阳性染色;10 例(7.5%)仅对 CRP 呈阳性,3 例(2.3%)仅对 SAA 呈阳性。CRP 的敏感性高于 SAA(97.74%比 92.48%,P 值=0.0961),且染色更广泛、更强烈,改良 H 评分明显更高(P<0.001)。FNH 也可显示 CRP 和 SAA 阳性染色,但改良 H 评分较低(P<0.0001)。根据β-连环蛋白和谷氨酰胺合成酶染色,26 例炎症性腺瘤也存在β-连环蛋白激活(19.5%)。所有 3 例 SAA 阳性而 CRP 阴性的病例均为β-连环蛋白激活。相比之下,无论β-连环蛋白是否激活,CRP 阳性而 SAA 阴性的病例比例相似。该数据证实了使用 CRP 和 SAA 免疫染色进行肝脏腺瘤亚型分类的策略,并提高了对 SAA 染色特征高度可变性质的认识。

相似文献

1
CRP Versus SAA for Identification of Inflammatory Hepatic Adenomas.CRP 与 SAA 对炎性肝腺瘤的鉴别诊断价值。
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2023 Oct 1;31(9):590-595. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000001155. Epub 2023 Sep 13.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验