• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜下切除大型吻合口息肉是安全有效的。

Endoscopic resection of large anastomotic polyps is safe and effective.

机构信息

Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia.

Medicine, The University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2024 Feb;56(2):125-130. doi: 10.1055/a-2174-2967. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1055/a-2174-2967
PMID:37699523
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Large (≥20mm) adenomatous anastomotic polyps (LAAPs) are uncommon. Data pertaining to their prevalence, characteristics, and the efficacy of endoscopic resection (ER) are absent. A safe and effective strategy for ER would reduce morbidity and healthcare costs.

METHODS

Large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of ≥20mm (LNPCPs) referred for ER were prospectively studied. Multiple data points were recorded including anastomotic location, polyp morphology, resection modality, complications, and technical success.

RESULTS

Over 7 years until November 2022, 2629 lesions were referred. Of these, 10 (0.4%) were LAAPs (median size 35 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 30-40mm]). All LAAPs were removed by piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), most (n=9; 90%) in combination with cold-forceps avulsion with adjuvant snare-tip soft coagulation (CAST). On comparison of the LAAP group with the conventional LNPCP group, CAST was more commonly used (90% vs. 9%; <0.001) and deep mural injury (DMI) type II was more frequent (40% vs. 11%, =0.003); however, significant DMI (III-V) did not occur. At 6 month (IQR 5.25-6 months) surveillance, there was no recurrence in any of the 10 cases. There were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

LAAPs present unique challenges owing to their location overlying an anastomosis. Despite these challenges they can be safely and effectively managed endoscopically without recurrence at endoscopic follow-up.

摘要

背景

大(≥20mm)腺瘤性吻合口息肉(LAAP)并不常见。目前尚无关于其患病率、特征以及内镜切除(ER)疗效的数据。安全有效的 ER 策略可以降低发病率和医疗保健成本。

方法

前瞻性研究了≥20mm(LNPCP)的大型无蒂结直肠息肉(LNPCP)患者,需要进行 ER。记录了多个数据点,包括吻合口位置、息肉形态、切除方式、并发症和技术成功率。

结果

截至 2022 年 11 月,7 年内共转介了 2629 例病变。其中 10 例(0.4%)为 LAAP(中位数大小为 35mm[四分位间距(IQR)30-40mm])。所有 LAAP 均通过分片内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)切除,其中大多数(n=9;90%)联合冷钳撕除和辅助圈套尖端软凝(CAST)。与常规 LNPCP 组相比,LAAP 组更常使用 CAST(90% vs. 9%,<0.001),且更常发生深壁损伤(DMI)Ⅱ型(40% vs. 11%,=0.003);然而,并未发生严重的 DMI(Ⅲ-Ⅴ型)。在 6 个月(IQR 5.25-6 个月)的随访中,10 例患者均无复发。无严重不良事件发生。

结论

由于 LAAP 位于吻合口上方,因此存在独特的挑战。尽管存在这些挑战,但它们可以通过内镜安全有效地进行管理,在内镜随访中无复发。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic resection of large anastomotic polyps is safe and effective.内镜下切除大型吻合口息肉是安全有效的。
Endoscopy. 2024 Feb;56(2):125-130. doi: 10.1055/a-2174-2967. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
2
Previously Attempted Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps Are Effectively Managed by Endoscopic Mucosal Resection.先前尝试过的大型无蒂结直肠息肉可通过内镜黏膜切除术有效治疗。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 May 1;116(5):958-966. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001096.
3
Effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy and cold endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm: a multicenter observational cohort study.冷圈套息肉切除术和冷内镜黏膜切除术治疗 10-19mm 无蒂结直肠息肉的有效性和安全性:一项多中心观察性队列研究。
Endoscopy. 2023 Jul;55(7):627-635. doi: 10.1055/a-2029-9539. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
4
Outcomes of Thermal Ablation of the Mucosal Defect Margin After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Prospective, International, Multicenter Trial of 1000 Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps.内镜黏膜切除术后黏膜缺损边缘热消融的结局:一项针对1000例大型无蒂结直肠息肉的前瞻性、国际性、多中心试验。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Jul;161(1):163-170.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.03.044. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
5
Outcomes of Deep Mural Injury After Endoscopic Resection: An International Cohort of 3717 Large Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps.内镜切除术后深层壁层损伤的结局:一项包含3717例大型无蒂结直肠息肉的国际队列研究
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;20(2):e139-e147. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
6
Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.三种不同内镜方法治疗 6-20mm 结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar;55(3):362-370. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1732456. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
7
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.与传统的内镜下黏膜切除术相比,对于大型结直肠息肉,水下内镜黏膜切除术的复发率较低,且能更早进行治愈性切除。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4174-4183. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5474-4. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
8
Safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas in the elderly.老年人大的无蒂结直肠腺瘤内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)的安全性
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;32(12):1711-1717. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2892-7. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
9
Recurrences of advanced sessile and lateral spreading colorectal adenoma after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) thermal ablation versus no adjuvant therapy (RESPECT): a protocol of an international randomized controlled trial.经内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)热消融与无辅助治疗(RESPECT)后高级无蒂和侧向蔓延型结直肠腺瘤复发的国际随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2024 Feb 17;25(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07915-2.
10
Efficacy and safety of cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of nonlifting colorectal polyps.帽辅助内镜黏膜切除术治疗不可抬举性大肠息肉的疗效及安全性
Endoscopy. 2022 May;54(5):509-514. doi: 10.1055/a-1559-2391. Epub 2021 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic approach to large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.内镜下治疗大肠广基息肉的方法。
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 21;8(Suppl 2):S62-S73. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwae030. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Endoscopic Resection of Neoplasia in the Lower GI Tract: A Clinical Algorithm.下消化道肿瘤的内镜切除:临床算法
Visc Med. 2024 Aug;40(4):217-227. doi: 10.1159/000539219. Epub 2024 Jun 26.