Department of Psychology, Hunan Normal University, No. 36 Lushan Road, Yuelu Dist., Changsha, 410081, Hunan, China.
Department of Psychology, South China Normal University, No. 55 Zhongshan Road, TianHe Dist., Guangzhou, 510631, China.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Oct;23(5):1460-1472. doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01124-1. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
The psychological mechanisms that high and low altruists exhibit in different contexts remain unknown. This study examined the underlying mechanisms of the effect of altruistic personality, social observation, and interpersonal distance on prosocial behavior using event-related potentials (ERPs). Participants with high and low altruism were asked to make prosocial or non-prosocial choices toward different interpersonal distances (friends, acquaintances, or strangers) under the (non)observer condition. The electrophysiological responses to the choice stimuli were simultaneously recorded. The behavioral results demonstrated that high altruists had more prosocial choices, and these choices were unaffected by interpersonal distance and social observation. However, low altruists made more prosocial choices toward friends and acquaintances under the observer than nonobserver conditions, whereas their prosocial choices toward strangers showed no difference. The ERP results demonstrated that low altruists showed more negative N2 when the choice stimuli were toward strangers and acquaintances or under the nonobserver condition. Furthermore, low altruists showed larger P3 under the observer than nonobserver conditions when the choice stimuli were toward friends and acquaintances, while this difference was absent when the choice stimuli were toward strangers. However, for high altruists, no effect of interpersonal distance and social observation was observed in N2 and P3. These results suggest that the prosocial behavior of low altruists is mainly driven by reputational incentives, whereas high altruists are primarily motivated by concern about the well-being of others. Our findings provide insights into the prosocial behavior of high and low altruists in different contexts and support the empathy-altruism hypothesis.
高利他主义者和低利他主义者在不同情境下表现出的心理机制尚不清楚。本研究采用事件相关电位(ERP)技术,考察了利他人格、社会观察和人际距离对亲社会行为的影响的潜在机制。高利他主义者和低利他主义者被要求在(非)观察条件下对不同人际距离(朋友、熟人或陌生人)做出亲社会或非亲社会选择。同时记录对选择刺激的电生理反应。行为结果表明,高利他主义者有更多的亲社会选择,而这些选择不受人际距离和社会观察的影响。然而,低利他主义者在观察条件下对朋友和熟人的亲社会选择比非观察条件下更多,而对陌生人的亲社会选择则没有差异。ERP 结果表明,当选择刺激是陌生人或熟人或在非观察条件下时,低利他主义者的 N2 更负。此外,当选择刺激是朋友和熟人时,低利他主义者在观察条件下的 P3 比非观察条件下更大,而当选择刺激是陌生人时,这种差异不存在。然而,对于高利他主义者,N2 和 P3 不受人际距离和社会观察的影响。这些结果表明,低利他主义者的亲社会行为主要是由声誉激励驱动的,而高利他主义者主要是出于对他人幸福的关注。我们的研究结果为不同情境下高利他主义者和低利他主义者的亲社会行为提供了新的见解,并支持了共情利他假说。