IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Foundation, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), Av. Fernando Abril Martorell 106, Torre A, Planta 1ª, 46026, Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Universidad de Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez 15, 46010, Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023 Sep 12;21(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12958-023-01131-4.
While various endometrial biomarkers have been characterized at the transcriptomic and functional level, there is generally a poor overlap among studies, making it unclear to what extent their upstream regulators (e.g., ovarian hormones, transcription factors (TFs) and microRNAs (miRNAs)) realistically contribute to menstrual cycle progression and function. Unmasking the intricacies of the molecular interactions in the endometrium from a novel systemic point of view will help gain a more accurate perspective of endometrial regulation and a better explanation the molecular etiology of endometrial-factor infertility.
An in-silico analysis was carried out to identify which regulators consistently target the gene biomarkers proposed in studies related to endometrial progression and implantation failure (19 gene lists/signatures were included). The roles of these regulators, and of genes related to progesterone and estrogens, were then analysed in transcriptomic datasets compiled from samples collected throughout the menstrual cycle (n = 129), and the expression of selected TFs were prospectively validated in an independent cohort of healthy participants (n = 19).
A total of 3,608 distinct genes from the 19 gene lists were associated with endometrial progression and implantation failure. The lists' regulation was significantly favoured by TFs (89% (17/19) of gene lists) and progesterone (47% (8 /19) of gene lists), rather than miRNAs (5% (1/19) of gene lists) or estrogen (0% (0/19) of gene lists), respectively (FDR < 0.05). Exceptionally, two gene lists that were previously associated with implantation failure and unexplained infertility were less hormone-dependent, but primarily regulated by estrogen. Although endometrial progression genes were mainly targeted by hormones rather than non-hormonal contributors (odds ratio = 91.94, FDR < 0.05), we identified 311 TFs and 595 miRNAs not previously associated with ovarian hormones. We highlight CTCF, GATA6, hsa-miR-15a-5p, hsa-miR-218-5p, hsa-miR-107, hsa-miR-103a-3p, and hsa-miR-128-3p, as overlapping novel master regulators of endometrial function. The gene expression changes of selected regulators throughout the menstrual cycle (FDR < 0.05), dually validated in-silico and through endometrial biopsies, corroborated their potential regulatory roles in the endometrium.
This study revealed novel hormonal and non-hormonal regulators and their relative contributions to endometrial progression and pathology, providing new leads for the potential causes of endometrial-factor infertility.
虽然已经在转录组和功能水平上对各种子宫内膜生物标志物进行了描述,但研究之间的重叠通常很差,因此不清楚它们的上游调节剂(例如卵巢激素、转录因子(TFs)和 microRNAs(miRNAs))在多大程度上真实地参与了月经周期的进展和功能。从全新的系统角度揭示子宫内膜中分子相互作用的复杂性将有助于更准确地了解子宫内膜的调节,并更好地解释子宫内膜因素不孕的分子病因。
进行了一项计算机分析,以确定哪些调节剂一致地靶向与子宫内膜进展和着床失败相关的研究中提出的基因生物标志物(包括 19 个基因列表/特征)。然后,在从整个月经周期收集的样本中汇编的转录组数据集(n=129)中分析这些调节剂以及与孕激素和雌激素相关的基因的作用,并在一个独立的健康参与者队列(n=19)中前瞻性验证选定 TF 的表达。
19 个基因列表中共有 3608 个不同的基因与子宫内膜进展和着床失败相关。这些列表的调节明显受到 TF(19 个基因列表中的 89%(17/19))和孕激素(19 个基因列表中的 47%(8/19))的支持,而不是 miRNA(19 个基因列表中的 5%(1/19))或雌激素(19 个基因列表中的 0%(0/19))(FDR<0.05)。异常的是,两个先前与着床失败和不明原因不孕相关的基因列表较少依赖于激素,但主要受雌激素调节。尽管子宫内膜进展基因主要受激素而不是非激素因素的靶向(比值比=91.94,FDR<0.05),但我们鉴定了 311 个以前与卵巢激素无关的 TF 和 595 个 miRNA。我们强调 CTCF、GATA6、hsa-miR-15a-5p、hsa-miR-218-5p、hsa-miR-107、hsa-miR-103a-3p 和 hsa-miR-128-3p,作为重叠的新的子宫内膜功能主调控因子。整个月经周期中选定调节剂的基因表达变化(FDR<0.05),在计算机分析和子宫内膜活检中均得到双重验证,证实了它们在子宫内膜中的潜在调节作用。
本研究揭示了新的激素和非激素调节剂及其对子宫内膜进展和病理学的相对贡献,为子宫内膜因素不孕的潜在原因提供了新的线索。